Shark Free Divers and Influencers - The Women Who Boop Sharks on the Nose

Here before a Timothy Treadwell recreation happens, this shit gives me enormous amounts of anxiety.

I’d be a little less worried if it was orcas but this is just cheating death at this point.
Yep. Jeff Leibowitz too. I had never heard of him until his bite and subsequent hospitalization, so I thought I'd put something together to get out ahead of this one in case things ever go south for any of these ladies.

Agree on the orcas. They almost never attack humans in the wild. Not that I'd ever go diving with them either, but if I had to choose between orcas and sharks, I'd definitely choose orcas.

Did these people change their names or is this a case of whatever its called when a persons name matches their profession?
Ocean Ramsey maintains that that is her actual name. Maybe a kiwi with better sleuthing skills than me will turn up something else though. She did (in my opinion) fib about her marine biology degree, so I wouldn't put it past her to lie about her name.

According to the Whitepages, Juan's middle initial is 'R', so no on the "Sharks".
Screen Shot 2024-10-03 at 9.57.53 AM.jpg
 
What could possibly go wrong? lol

Man we needed a thread that isn't related to someone being a literal horrorcow or a nuisance to society for once and instead just people who don't know any better about something they SHOULD very clearly know better doing. Mammals are not Disney characters. They will not know you other than you're just something for them to bother either not to do something with or that you're their next meal or violent target. That's just how it is.

No one's one with nature and the animals. Nature and animals have a sayso in whether you're "one with them" or not.
Indeed, especially the part I bolded. I think one reason for absurd behaviors like this is people constructing their worldviews with movies & cartoons, which often anthropomorphize animals. From there, they start thinking of dangerous apex predators as pets, losing sight of the reality of the natural world. The comparisons with Treadwell are apt, he too was deluded in that way, and paid the ultimate price.
 
I wonder what other wildly dangerous animal they can hang around for clout? Living with polar bears? That one snake guy can learn a thing or two about wilfully dangerous situations
it's like going up to a lion and trying to pat its mane.
funny you should say that....
1727968891957.png
Noel Marshall and Tippi Hedren, you see, were the very special kind of psychopathic eccentrics you only get among the wealthy elite of California. After a trip to Mozambique in 1969, they were inspired by the plight of the local lion populations to make a movie in tribute to the wonderful animals, showcasing how peaceable and not-actually-threatening lions really were. And taking further inspiration from the sight of an abandoned plantation villa that had become the den for a lion pride, they decided that this film would substantially involve lions puttering about a human habitation, while the humans involved did their best to stay out of the way. Somewhere along the film's seven-year path from conception to shooting, Marshall and Hedren realized they could both substantially increase their feline cast and do the good work of helping threatened animals by collecting abandoned lions, tigers, leopard, pumas, elephants (!), and flamingos (!!), and letting them wander loose on the ranch the couple bought just for the purpose. Thus they'd have not just a memorable and important film bringing public attention to the importance of conserving and protecting the big cats, they'd also have a preserve all ready to go (and Hedren has, to her great credit, devoted much of her life in the years since to carrying out that mission, turning the ranch into the Shambala Preserve, maintained by the Roar Foundation).

Anyway, this didn't happen, because to the non-surprise of just about every living human not named Noel Marshall and Tippi Hedren, putting a film crew in the middle of 150 largely untrained big cats is unbelievably goddamn dangerous. Shooting Roar stretched out from a scheduled six months to over four years, as a simply tremendous number of crew members and virtually all of the cast suffered injuries from lacerations and scrapes to Jan de Bont being literally scalped by a lion, requiring 220 stitches (in one of the most inspiring and/or mentally deranged "the show must go on" stories in history, de Bont returned to the production after recovering). Flooding, disease, and fires all took their toll on the feline cast, and there was, you will be just stunned to learn, an abnormally large amount of crew turnover as people began refusing to come back to set. Nobody died, which is both good and tremendously surprising.
 
Doesn't "booping the snoots" of sharks fuck with them?
Yes, if you are booping them its because they are trying to bite you.

Kiwimoids so mad that women feel safer around sharks than men they make a thread on them and project their zoophilia and vore fetishism onto these women

View attachment 6483176
Honestly, I kind of agree. Don't really get why this is a thread. I am mad jelly though. Being a deep sea explorer (which none of them are but setting that aside...) would be so cool.
 
They're thrill seekers. It's clear to me they've already anticipated death in advance and they know good and well how dangerous it is based on the things they say, if only just to push the limits and add one more day to life on earth. Hell, ocean ramsey may even be perfectly happy to die getting ripped up by a shark should the day come. This is just how serious thrill seekers are. Stupid? Sure. What would a human be if they weren't stupid and willing to flirt with death from time to time.
 
Kiwimoids so mad that women feel safer around sharks than men they make a thread on them and project their zoophilia and vore fetishism onto these women

View attachment 6483176
Shoo. SHOO. Back into the containment thread! Go!

On the topic of the thread: I think that even if it's retarded they should be allowed to do it because they're not putting anyone in danger except themselves, obviously they know how dangerous it is when they do it. Danger is good, God didn't intend us to live in safe heated rooms and buy food at a grocery store, he intended us to be in danger pretty much every day of our life.
 
Even if the sharks don't attack, it's not great to condition sharks that human contact is a positive thing. While these women may be 'safe' petting the sharks (and probably also feeding them, much like shark cage tours that dump chum to attract them), if a shark continues to approach humans for pats or simply curiosity, it just endangers both other humans and the shark. One accidental bite and someone loses a limb, or worse, and a shark hunt happens and sharks continue to be cast in a negative light by the media and the general public.
As with all wild animals, the best approach is observe but don't touch. Unless you are some kind of vet or caretaker of orphaned animals, there is no need to be going around touching them, no matter how much you want to.
 
Even if the sharks don't attack, it's not great to condition sharks that human contact is a positive thing. While these women may be 'safe' petting the sharks (and probably also feeding them, much like shark cage tours that dump chum to attract them), if a shark continues to approach humans for pats or simply curiosity, it just endangers both other humans and the shark. One accidental bite and someone loses a limb, or worse, and a shark hunt happens and sharks continue to be cast in a negative light by the media and the general public.
As with all wild animals, the best approach is observe but don't touch. Unless you are some kind of vet or caretaker of orphaned animals, there is no need to be going around touching them, no matter how much you want to.
This is pretty much my thought on the whole thing.
No matter their credentials and claims to "help" the sharks, true conservation is strictly observation only. You change what you interact with and these women are directly affecting the sharks' environments and behaviour.

As much as I admire their spirit, they're putting their need for asspats and admiration before the sharks' wellbeing, and that's no bueno.
 
Retards cannot be content to just observe or research or study an animal, they will actively make the animals' lives more difficult because they want to be very unique and special ~animal whisperers~ that have a ~connection~ that lets them play with wild animals. I'd respect it more if they were just honest about it: "I think I am special enough to play with sharks in the ocean despite the danger". Just more selfish influencer behaviour, TID, etc.
 
While I agree that "sharks ain't that bad" I don't think putting yourself into a potentially fatal position is worth the Tiktok/Internet fame. It comes off so stupid. Why can't these women do a course at a aquarium or something? In a slightly more controlled environment? The obvious guess is "aquariums are bad."
 
get rotated idiot

You know, social media has really helped me to grow my pet hatreds for certain types of people. No matter what the theme may be, whether it's shark tickling or walking through a swamp at night and harassing the wildlife, there's always that little voice in the back of my head that constantly screams "ATTENTION WHORE" at the top of its lungs. I want to like the cool extreme photos and glimpses into these hidden worlds, but take the douchebag out of the photo please. yknow? I just wanna see the animals. I don't care to look at your $50,000 curated selfies.
 
Back