Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Gorillion others]

apologizes

A begrudging sorry doesn't really make her character any better. It didn't even feel like an apology.

Bianca DiAngelo, on the other hand

Holy fuck, I have to agree with you on this. The girl was a massive cunt.

 

[SnergenFlergen]

They were really actually super split on the issue with a big chunk of the TRAs insisting that cwc was never a "real" tranny because he allegedly admitted he was only trooning out to bang lesbians (because obviously cwc is known for being very clear, consistent and well spoken when expressing himself).

Indeed, I acknowledged their penchant for No True Scotsman-ing undesirables out of the club as and when it suits them.

 

[Argos]

not all trans people are like this,

Doesn't matter.

There is no way to determine which dude in a dress is a threat and which isn't. How much money they shell out trying to convince themselves they're a woman doesn't matter. They will never be women and have no place in women's spaces.

 

[AnOminous]

Reddit so desperate to get Goblins = Jews thing to stick. The times of Israel still randomly attacks J.K Rowling.

This is literal retardation. It's a famous building (Australia House) that has been in multiple movies. That star is on the floor of the real world building.

 

[luigismanslave]

Troon is upset that the local fag club is hosting a Harry Potter themed party.
View attachment 6483075

https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/1furne1/gay_club_harry_potter_party/

wow, now those first two know how women feel when they see men in dresses

 

[Sourceress]

Doesn't matter.

There is no way to determine which dude in a dress is a threat and which isn't. How much money they shell out trying to convince themselves they're a woman doesn't matter. They will never be women and have no place in women's spaces.

And the bottom line is that as long as they're trying to access women's spaces, services, sports, etc. they are all threats. And there are a few parts to this.

1. The kind of man who decides he can "identify" as a woman is already demonstrating a kind of dehumanizing misogyny that demonstrates a threat to women. These men consider themselves to be the high arbiters of what "woman" means, and they always consider it to mean debasing, misogynistic stereotypes - for example, a trans-identified male might say, "I'm such a woman because I'm submissive in bed and physically weak," or "I'm a woman because I love makeup and fantasize about being fucked by men," reinforcing misogynistic stereotypes about women that aren't true. Positioning women as an idea that exists in a man's head, rather than as multifaceted human beings whose experiences and lives cannot be appropriated, shows a dangerous lack of consideration for women and women's humanity.

2. The kind of man who decides to access women's spaces, etc., where he knows he does not belong is already demonstrating that he does not respect women or women's boundaries, does not adhere to the social expectations and boundaries of society, and lacks empathy for women / sees himself as inherently more important than women. He is already demonstrating behaviors that make him a threat to women. These men know they don't belong in these spaces and that being there causes distress to women. They either don't care or they get off on it. Having these men in women's spaces makes the spaces more dangerous for the women in them - not just because the men may assault them, but also these men open the door for other men who may assault them, since they are never content until they ensure every "women's" space becomes a unisex space. (This is not to mention the women who are directly harmed by these men even if they are not assaulted, such as rape victims who may be triggered by the hulking hon in the rape crisis center, homeless women who have been ejected from women's homelessness shelters because they objected to the presence of a trans-identified male, abuse victims who stop attending their group therapy because they don't feel comfortable disclosing their abuse to a man, children frightened in bathrooms, and so on.)

3. As I referenced above, opening the door for one of these males means opening the door for all men. Period. If you allow trans-identified males into a women's space, you are allowing any man who says "oh yeah, I'm totally a woman, sure" in, because you're not allowed to challenge these men based on their presentation - and even if you could, it would be meaningless, because any man can slap on a wig and fishnets. So even if you somehow managed to believe, despite everything I said above, that trans-identified males are primarily virtuous sweet innocents who wouldn't harm a fly and have "feminine souls" or whatever the fuck stupid shit, that doesn't matter because Joe Rapist off the street can now walk into the rape crisis center, declare that he feels like a woman on the inside, and proceed to terrorize the women in the center as much as he wants, because "woman" no longer means anything thanks to these men.

Trans-identified males are a threat and danger to all women. Every single one of them. There is just an unbelievable amount of misogyny needed to decide you know better than women what a woman is and how it feels to be a woman, and no man that misogynistic is safe for women. Period, end of story.

 

[Lone Star]

Do you even need to ask? Goddamn, that was bad. It's like something written by an out of touch dad who wants to show his kids how "in" he is.

I only heard about the shit from his latest books in this thread. Haven't actually read any since the Jason Grace series ended so didn't know what happened in which book.

 

[lamppost]

Troon is upset that the local fag club is hosting a Harry Potter themed party.
View attachment 6483072
View attachment 6483075

https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/1furne1/gay_club_harry_potter_party/

"Personally I can't help but view men in dresses as a threat, I would instantly think less of them and avoid being around them as much as possible.

Now that might not always be fair, but it is what happens."

Nice to see we've found some common ground.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Reminder that not all trans people are like this, in fact, many are willing to put the effort of actually trying to look like their desired sex (though I still see them as men out of principle).

But i don't fault JK too much for this, trannies are just way too fucking lenient, thinking that anyone that declares themselves to be a woman is woman, period, and if you say otherwise you're le transphobic, leading to these kinds of situations where predatory men or even downright registered sex offenders can easily blend in with them and they should probably stop demanding they should have their pronouns respected, you're making yourselves look extremely bad by doing this.

This guy fucks femboys and traps.

 

[Pedophobe]

this is pure unfiltered mental illness, can't they consider that people just enjoy the Harry Potter books and don't give a single fuck about the author herself, i.e: MOST PEOPLE

That's the problem. Something in this world being more important than their feelings is an anathema.

 

[Miriam Margoyles]

Joe Rapist

Potentially quite a good Kiwi Farms username.

 

[Maginot]

Potentially quite a good Kiwi Farms username.

Depends on the subsection, John Rapist would be a rad fem that finds sex work bad that posts in the lolcow salon. Joe Rapist would be someone mad that women can retract consent that posts in the general boards.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

My question is, do these men really have gender dysphoria or are they just merely using the cover of transitioning as an excuse for easy access to vulnerable women, should the trans community shoulder the faults of these bad actors who could be infiltrating their movement for their own sick desires?

As long as they support self-id as a sole criteria, then they have no grounds to separate themselves from the perverts. This along with women's sports is the key reason I got blackpilled on this topic.

 

[Mayhem]

This is literal retardation. It's a famous building (Australia House) that has been in multiple movies. That star is on the floor of the real world building.

I'm not sure they realize that just because JKR wrote the books does not mean she had any creative control over the film versions of those books, which all had a director, art director, cinematographer, set designers, costumers, and creature and prosthetic designers (who were the ones who gave the goblins those exaggerated pointed ears and noses). So who of those people down the line are anti-Semitic, or all they all anti-Semites?

I don't even know why they bring this up anymore, anyway, since they all say worse things about Israel and Jews than JKR has ever said.

 

[Dr. Butt]

Depends on the subsection, John Rapist would be a rad fem that finds sex work bad that posts in the lolcow salon. Joe Rapist would be someone mad that women can retract consent that posts in the general boards.

Joe Rapist is funnier because it sounds like "your rapist".

 

[FinnSven]

I'm not sure they realize that just because JKR wrote the books does not mean she had any creative control over the film versions of those books, which all had a director, art director, cinematographer, set designers, costumers, and creature and prosthetic designers (who were the ones who gave the goblins those exaggerated pointed ears and noses). So who of those people down the line are anti-Semitic, or all they all anti-Semites?

I don't even know why they bring this up anymore, anyway, since they all say worse things about Israel and Jews than JKR has ever said.

As has been pointed out before, the goblins were clearly supposed to be human like but inhuman.

More like Warhammer green skinned orcs/orks than anything else I would say.

They bring it up because there was a recent big hoo-hah with there being long running and unaddressed anti semitism within the Labour Party.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm not sure they realize that just because JKR wrote the books does not mean she had any creative control over the film versions of those books, which all had a director, art director, cinematographer, set designers, costumers, and creature and prosthetic designers (who were the ones who gave the goblins those exaggerated pointed ears and noses).

She actually had clout enough to get veto power over anything Harry Potter. They can't do something if she doesn't agree to it. Retaining that degree of control is why she's one of the wealthiest women in the UK and nearly a billionaire (maybe she is that now). You're still right that there is about zero chance she had anything to do with personally picking an iconic building used in many other movies.

So who of those people down the line are anti-Semitic, or all they all anti-Semites?

Well obviously they're all anti-Semitic. They're all part of that huge anti-Semitic conspiracy that runs Hollywood.

 

[Gorillion others]

She actually had clout enough to get veto power over anything Harry Potter. They can't do something if she doesn't agree to it. Retaining that degree of control is why she's one of the wealthiest women in the UK and nearly a billionaire (maybe she is that now). You're still right that there is about zero chance she had anything to do with personally picking an iconic building used in many other movies.

Well obviously they're all anti-Semitic. They're all part of that huge anti-Semitic conspiracy that runs Hollywood.

Yet, these are the same people who want Israel to become a smoking crater. These people are nothing. They're empty. They believe in nothing. Worthless bags of flesh that will sell everything they have for a bottle of water if it'll give them a dopamine high.

EDIT: And they won't even fucking drink it. Instead, they'll shove it into their stinkditch.

 

[Surfin Terf]

As has been pointed out before, the goblins were clearly supposed to be human like but inhuman.

More like Warhammer green skinned orcs/orks than anything else I would say.

They bring it up because there was a recent big hoo-hah with there being long running and unaddressed anti semitism within the Labour Party.

The fact that goblins (and other intelligent, non-wizard beings) were mistreated and disenfranchised by wizards who don't even recognize the oppressive wizard-supremacist systems at play was a recurring theme*. It's literally a woke message, but with wizards and fantasy creatures instead of white people and minorities. Even if we do believe that goblins are Jews, they aren't reasonably the bad guys by any means.

* The goblin examples I can think of off the top of my head are the fact that goblins are forbidden from using wands, one of the older Weasley children worrying that the goblins might ally with the Death Eaters if they offer them rights, and the statue at the Ministry of Magic which portrays a very paternalistic view of wizards and goblins

 

[BigJoey41X]

This guy fucks femboys and traps.

nigga what?

And the bottom line is that as long as they're trying to access women's spaces, services, sports, etc. they are all threats. And there are a few parts to this.

1. The kind of man who decides he can "identify" as a woman is already demonstrating a kind of dehumanizing misogyny that demonstrates a threat to women. These men consider themselves to be the high arbiters of what "woman" means, and they always consider it to mean debasing, misogynistic stereotypes - for example, a trans-identified male might say, "I'm such a woman because I'm submissive in bed and physically weak," or "I'm a woman because I love makeup and fantasize about being fucked by men," reinforcing misogynistic stereotypes about women that aren't true. Positioning women as an idea that exists in a man's head, rather than as multifaceted human beings whose experiences and lives cannot be appropriated, shows a dangerous lack of consideration for women and women's humanity.

2. The kind of man who decides to access women's spaces, etc., where he knows he does not belong is already demonstrating that he does not respect women or women's boundaries, does not adhere to the social expectations and boundaries of society, and lacks empathy for women / sees himself as inherently more important than women. He is already demonstrating behaviors that make him a threat to women. These men know they don't belong in these spaces and that being there causes distress to women. They either don't care or they get off on it. Having these men in women's spaces makes the spaces more dangerous for the women in them - not just because the men may assault them, but also these men open the door for other men who may assault them, since they are never content until they ensure every "women's" space becomes a unisex space. (This is not to mention the women who are directly harmed by these men even if they are not assaulted, such as rape victims who may be triggered by the hulking hon in the rape crisis center, homeless women who have been ejected from women's homelessness shelters because they objected to the presence of a trans-identified male, abuse victims who stop attending their group therapy because they don't feel comfortable disclosing their abuse to a man, children frightened in bathrooms, and so on.)

3. As I referenced above, opening the door for one of these males means opening the door for all men. Period. If you allow trans-identified males into a women's space, you are allowing any man who says "oh yeah, I'm totally a woman, sure" in, because you're not allowed to challenge these men based on their presentation - and even if you could, it would be meaningless, because any man can slap on a wig and fishnets. So even if you somehow managed to believe, despite everything I said above, that trans-identified males are primarily virtuous sweet innocents who wouldn't harm a fly and have "feminine souls" or whatever the fuck stupid shit, that doesn't matter because Joe Rapist off the street can now walk into the rape crisis center, declare that he feels like a woman on the inside, and proceed to terrorize the women in the center as much as he wants, because "woman" no longer means anything thanks to these men.

Trans-identified males are a threat and danger to all women. Every single one of them. There is just an unbelievable amount of misogyny needed to decide you know better than women what a woman is and how it feels to be a woman, and no man that misogynistic is safe for women. Period, end of story.

I think @Sourceress put it best out of everyone who replied to me, for you people wondering why I am so unusually charitable towards the trannies compared to literally everyone else on this site, I personally sympathize with them to some extent, while I will never know what it's like to "not be comfortable with my biological sex", I do understand feeling like they don't belong with the rest of society, I'd like to explain things from their POV because there is always another side to this.

Of course, this doesn't excuse the whole "invading bathrooms" thing.