Your 推し is くそ Rev says desu / Louis Testone Jr. / "The Lolicon King" - A lolicon Vtuber with a 700k sub Youtube Channel, Grown Ass Man into drawings of little girls getting fucked, married to a fat bitch that thinks "loli pussy hits different".

[WelperHelper99]

Here’s dear feeder’s response to that tweet

Based Josh is truly best Josh.

That Diogo guy knows jackshit about this website.

I mean I can explain why we watch Rev, he's a prolific lolicon pedophile with a nearly 700k sub youtube channel. Why wouldn't we document him? He's a freak.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

It's like that classic piece from Hamlet (I believe) - "Methinks the lady doth protest too much".

That’s ‘The lady doth protest too much, methinks’

And yes, it is Hamlet.

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

This site unironically has one has the nicest vtuber threads. And even the Pipa Cow thread is nice. Because she is a Corpro Tuber and therefore boring by requirement.

And we do go after Mother’s Basement. Lmao.

He's saying that we should stick to going after people like Mother's Basement, not that we didn't do it. I don't know why, but it seems like many terminally online weebs dislike him, maybe because he's married (to a fucking OnlyFans prostitute, lol!)

 

[WelperHelper99]

He's saying that we should stick to going after people like Mother's Basement, not that we didn't do it. I don't know why, but it seems like many terminally online weebs dislike him, maybe because he's married (to a fucking OnlyFans prostitute, lol!)

Mother's Basement's existence is a living hell of making "why Sword Art Online is bad #2535775" for infinity. I know he has a thread here, but personally I have no interest in a man with a dying career. Rev on the other hand is on the upswing. He should be documented before the great crash (when it happens).

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

Mother's Basement's existence is a living hell of making "why Sword Art Online is bad #2535775" for infinity. I know he has a thread here, but personally I have no interest in a man with a dying career. Rev on the other hand is on the upswing. He should be documented before the great crash (when it happens).

The worst part is that he still gets enough money and views to keep going, with most of his recent videos being on the high 300ks-low 400ks, he just doesn't do anything interesting. And his channel is going to be 10 years old soon, too, the man is Youtube's Sysiphus

 

[WelperHelper99]

The worst part is that he still gets enough money and views to keep going, with most of his recent videos being on the high 300ks-low 400ks, he just doesn't do anything interesting. And his channel is going to be 10 years old soon, too, the man is Youtube's Sysiphus

Boring is how I'd describe him. He is representative of anime youtube as a whole. Very few standouts, those who do stand out aren't content mills because they have lives which means you only get a few videos a year, and those that have been chugging for years are usually cucked in some way, usually by Crunchyroll by becoming shills. It's sad man. The state of it.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

He's saying that we should stick to going after people like Mother's Basement, not that we didn't do it.

My point is we can and do both. Site is big enough for that.

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

That’s ‘The lady doth protest too much, methinks’

And yes, it is Hamlet.

Thank you.

 

[Nigga Bullshit]

Twitch just announced [A] that they are adding "Enforcement Notes" to their Community Guidelines. These are essentially annotations which clarify existing rules and give examples of what isn't allowed:


One of these notes [A] confirms that VTubers with child-like models cannot do any sexual content:


This has caused Rev to complain on Twitter and say that these new rules will be used to persecute VTubers like him:
Source [A]
Source [A]
Source [A]

Spoiler: Mild NSFW

Source [A]

Apparently they are "demonizing vtubers for existing":
Source [A]

Fat wife has also weighed in [A] on the situation:


Edit:
Source [A]

 

[WelperHelper99]

Twitch just announced [A] that they are adding "Enforcement Notes" to their Community Guidelines. These are essentially annotations which clarify existing rules and give examples of what isn't allowed:
View attachment 6497505

One of these notes [A] confirms that VTubers with child-like models cannot do any sexual content:
View attachment 6497517

This has caused Rev to complain on Twitter and say that these new rules will be used to persecute VTubers like him:
View attachment 6497526Source [A]
View attachment 6497538Source [A]
View attachment 6497542Source [A]

Spoiler: Mild NSFW

View attachment 6497586Source [A]

Apparently they are "demonizing vtubers for existing":
View attachment 6497547Source [A]

Fat wife has also weighed in [A] on the situation:
View attachment 6497557

Guess Rev is finally have to update his shitty model now! Lmao.

 

[Fat At The Internet]

Source [A]

So I mostly know of twitch norms from background radiation, but hasn't the feet thing been a big no-no basically across the board for the better part of a decade?
Second, as part of due diligence and research, I looked up that asianbunnyx streamer, and she has a sexual themes thing up (in fairness, probably because of the attention) which causes it not to show up in the Just Chatting feed. Kind of surprised it lets you through without a login, but would I be far off to guess an auth'ed user has to adjust their settings to make them visible on the public feed?

I know that getting suspended for not using themes was the big outrage farm from a few weeks ago so maybe twitch should make that more front and center rather than nesting it another page deep and fleshing that out. Maybe add "Twitter Ramblings" and "Cuckime 'Tism" as themes if Rev considers that mature topics, idk.
Gonna keep watching asianbunnyx to see if I can pick up a new lead. I feel like this case is going to crack open any minute now.

 

[WelperHelper99]

So I mostly know of twitch norms from background radiation, but hasn't the feet thing been a big no-no basically across the board for the better part of a decade?
Second, as part of due diligence and research, I looked up that asianbunnyx streamer, and she has a sexual themes thing up (in fairness, probably because of the attention) which causes it not to show up in the Just Chatting feed. Kind of surprised it lets you through without a login, but would I be far off to guess an auth'ed user has to adjust their settings to make them visible on the public feed?
View attachment 6500776View attachment 6500778
I know that getting suspended for not using themes was the big outrage farm from a few weeks ago so maybe twitch should make that more front and center rather than nesting it another page deep and fleshing that out. Maybe add "Twitter Ramblings" and "Cuckime 'Tism" as themes if Rev considers that mature topics, idk.
Gonna keep watching asianbunnyx to see if I can pick up a new lead. I feel like this case is going to crack open any minute now.

So basically this whore thot is deboosted, basically a ghost unless you look for her under the new policy. Interesting. That's just a blatant lie from Rev then. I didn't even think of looking into that. You have a good eye.

https://preservetube.com/watch?v=hm7_aOyZ2qY

Haven't even watched it yet. But judging by all the tweets @Nigga Bullshit brought over, I can only imagine the fucking salt. SUFFAH bish!

 

[Elite Kipchak]

>no YOU are the one who wants to fuck kids
why is this always his go-to whenever the subject of lolis comes up. it's such a retarded defense. Do better, Louis.

 

[WelperHelper99]

The first minute of the video i can only describe as this:

This screenshot sums up everything i think. The cope. The seething. The MALDING. Gee, I wonder Rev, one is a grown woman, one is a sexualized child, what's the difference?

 

[Fat At The Internet]

what's the difference

Ummm, ashually can you use xir's custom definitions?

The "it's a body type" argument cracks me up because it just has the obvious follow up of "it's a child's body".
Anime is pretty autistic with it's tropes. It tends to typeset to loli -> high schooler -> adult, while middle schoolers to get sub-classed as loli.
You can make some arguments for oppai loli = shortstacks, but I think that's a tangent that's the least of his concerns. It depends on the child *chuckles*.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Ummm, ashually can you use xir's custom definitions?
View attachment 6501265
The "it's a body type" argument cracks me up because it just has the obvious follow up of "it's a child's body".
Anime is pretty autistic with it's tropes. It tends to typeset to loli -> high schooler -> adult, while middle schoolers to get sub-classed as loli.
You can make some arguments for oppai loli = shortstacks, but I think that's a tangent that's the least of his concerns. It depends on the child *chuckles*.

Bro my soul left my body when he went "yeah she's 20" *anime girl clearly not 20*.

But yeah. The fact he needs to bring out a dictionary for a simple matter, which is don't sexulize children, says a lot. I guess that's lawyer school for him paying off.

 

[Gog & Magog]

Has Louis ever given an example of what a real woman with a "lolita body type" looks like? Does he even know what one looks like?

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

https://preservetube.com/watch?v=hm7_aOyZ2qY

View attachment 6501102
Haven't even watched it yet. But judging by all the tweets @Nigga Bullshit brought over, I can only imagine the fucking salt. SUFFAH bish!

Perfect. As usual, he'll use "bull-shitto" as his martial arts defence argument. And I'm sure many xitter tards will cover up by making "super funny" stuff by making clever remarks or something. Yet, I guess I'll use this video here as the usual response:

 

[imaginary friend]

Source [A]

"How does one determine the age of a fictional character?" Like the person above him said, people who have young-looking characters won't get banned, just sexualizing them. Something that Rev claims even adults shouldn't do on Twitch; so shouldn't all people who do soft-core porn on Twitch be banned according to Rev? Why isn't he asking "how does one determine whether content is sexual"? What is there to be worried about? Or is he worried about VTubers that do soft-core (lolisho) porn being disadvantaged over real life adult women who do soft-core porn? Seems like a weird thing to be mad about.

I wonder, why did he just repeat "why are VTubers so offensive", when the Xitterer already explained only pornified childlike models were the problem? Almost like Rev is implying that young VTuber models are inherently sexual, or that VTubing is a soft-core porn industry. He keeps self-reporting, it's pretty funny.

 

[ShitBomber]

"How does one determine the age of a fictional character?" Like the person above him said, people who have young-looking characters won't get banned, just sexualizing them. Something that Rev claims even adults shouldn't do on Twitch; so shouldn't all people who do soft-core porn on Twitch be banned according to Rev? Why isn't he asking "how does one determine whether content is sexual"? What is there to be worried about? Or is he worried about VTubers that do soft-core (lolisho) porn being disadvantaged over real life adult women who do soft-core porn? Seems like a weird thing to be mad about.

I wonder, why did he just repeat "why are VTubers so offensive", when the Xitterer already explained only pornified childlike models were the problem? Almost like Rev is implying that young VTuber models are inherently sexual, or that VTubing is a soft-core porn industry. He keeps self-reporting, it's pretty funny.

He really sucks at trying to hide this fact to be honest. I mean, he commissioned NSFW art of his VTuber model and posted it on Twitter and Patreon. Though who knows how much shit he has liked, reposted, or posted himself since most of the NSFW shit he shared was likely scrubbed from his social media.