Trans author insists that gender is all that matters regarding sexuality and identity - and then later says AGAB - assigned gender at birth, because that's what we're using now - is 'irrelevant'. Context: a story in which a character, canonically male, is telling a pooner it's OK because they are a true and honest dood. This other character is also canonically male.

> If a person identifies as a man, he's a man
> AGAB is irrelevant to gender identity
> Man is a term one grows into
> Hinges on 'societal definition of a man' and gives no adequate answer on what said definition is
> Hinges on matter-of-fact statements, does not want to debate the fact that 'man' means something, and is not an abstract concept
Every trans person believes that anyone questioning their bullshit is acting in 'bad faith'. They want YOU to sit down and learn about the 'nuances of gender identity' while casually swapping sex for gender, because gender is something they can mix and match despite saying they never deny what sex they are. What gender is a newborn infant? What gender roles do they perform despite them not even having the power of speech yet? The fact that they base their manhood on said restrictive societal norms, while demanding that we abolish them, is peak pooner retardation.
Snagged this from Pinterest. What started off as a homoerotic analysis turned into this:

"Phantom gender"
What?