- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
I think the fact that he is using a book that effectively uses a non-Christian lens to interpret the Gospels while he scolds all you prudes for twisting Christianity for your own purposes [which purpose coincidentally involves passing judgment on his continued willful violation of Christian principles] is pretty rich.Dear Kiwi fags, all your holier-than-thou screeching about Jesus is all just a big grift and it saddens Nick to see you act this way. You have no substance. You have no contemplation. Please stop praying loudly, it is bad for Nick's mentals. Remember that Nick (basically the Tiger Woods of Christianity) isn't mad that you think his 8 yo was drugged up, he's just disappointed that you no longer accept his shower texts to explain that people don't know the full story.
Be better.
I say this with zero moral or religious judgment of pantheism. I have broad personal and academic exposure to the Abrahamic religions, their ancient Near Eastern context and syncretism, European paganism, Western occult and folk religion, etc. I don't get upset or indignant about people practicing these traditions. In fact, I am quite sympathetic to pantheism.
But what he is doing is simply finding an angle to criticize Christianity from an outside perspective, not as a Christian condemning the iniquity and hypocrisy of his fellow Christians.
Oh, Nick.
There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures.
- 2 Peter 3:16
Enjoy your own destruction.