Caden Wayne Scholeck / Jade Scholeck / BlueFolf / Blue / a gassy femdom - Parasitic clout chaser. Macrophiliac scat fetishist. Shitted on a plate and filmed it. Left a disabled woman in crippling debt. Tried to sue a Twitter gimmick account and failed. Disowned by father. Lied about being assaulted. + His Orbiters and A-logs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Tom can't afford to lose his sponsors
Why even be a millionaire if you're still going to call trannies "she" to appease handouts from sponsors? Is he really that incapable of scaling his wealth without reading BetterHelp ads over gossip videos about the furry poop eater?

Like damn, at least try to invest or make your money earn you money. At some point, you can't both flex that you're independently wealthy and then cope that your wealth is dependent upon slurping up the stinkditch.
 
Turkey Tom is a known eater of the Poo Poo. Hear that sound of a tummy rumbling? No, that's not the parasites in Folf's undercarriage you hear. That's Turkey getting hungry for more tranny shit!
I guess you are a disruptive guest for a reason. Thx for the mental image.

Lol
Screenshot_20241009_210556_Brave.jpg
 
Last edited:
This video is more proof we need sitewide Kiwifarms watermarking on all images posted.
I don't see why, Tom mentioned the thread.

Also, I am pretty sure youtube considers it bullying to call men men. Dude just wants his money from jewtube, not going to hate on him for that. He is however still a faggot for not cross uploading to other platforms.
 
What kind of actual faggot would willingly impede the free spread of information?
No one was talking about impeding it, newfag. It'd just be really fun to force all the derivative youtubers who harvest our threads while pretending we're all satan to have to admit where they're getting their information. A watermark accomplishes this while still leaving the content available to the public.
 
No one was talking about impeding it, newfag. It'd just be really fun to force all the derivative youtubers who harvest our threads while pretending we're all satan to have to admit where they're getting their information. A watermark accomplishes this while still leaving the content available to the public.
No it wouldn't they just go to the archives source and screenshot it there dumbass. That's some retarded shit reddit would do. Also, Tom mentioned the thread in the video with a screenshot of it, so I don't know what you want exactly does he have to say "according to the kiwi farms" every sentence.

Go to reddit if you want to complain about not getting credited for taking a screenshot of someone else saying something.

Someone doesn't credit or mention kiwifarms you people bitch, they do, you also bitch. You just want someone to suck your cock for the whole hour long video be honest.
 
that makes for some shit content with an uncitable source
So, the same as what every drama channel already produces. Most of them don't even show the screenshot already. Even more of them don't link sources and your complaint is they dont source the evil kiwifsrms anyways.

What's exactly the change??

Problem according to you: They don't source the evil kf

Solution: Put " this meme was stolen from reddit" on everything.

Counter: Don't use a screenshot and just read it

Counter to counter: But then they wouldn't be sourcing the source... Which is the kiwi farms
 
Last edited:
The video was obviously derivative and missing some important information, I'm unsure whether he omitted some information due to fear of strikes from YouTube or he believed that his viewers would not be interested in certain parts. I guess it is difficult to compress information about such a repellent figure within the narrow confines of a YouTube video that is appropriate for all audiences. Tom has to hold the line completely, as he would likely lose his channel if he covered a lot of incidents deeply like the OP and all 179 pages of this thread. He has little else going for him so he would be circumspect.
 
Why even be a millionaire if you're still going to call trannies "she" to appease handouts from sponsors? Is he really that incapable of scaling his wealth without reading BetterHelp ads over gossip videos about the furry poop eater?

Like damn, at least try to invest or make your money earn you money. At some point, you can't both flex that you're independently wealthy and then cope that your wealth is dependent upon slurping up the stinkditch.
It's not about the sponsors. See:

I can see not wanting to misgender Brownfolf due to increased regulations on that sort of thing across mainstream social media.
Tom has to hold the line completely, as he would likely lose his channel if he covered a lot of incidents deeply like the OP and all 179 pages of this thread. He has little else going for him so he would be circumspect.
 
It's not about the sponsors. See:
Swap that one detail and my point still stands. He doesn't want to lose money (or the thing which generates him money), so he calls the unemployed drug abusing suicide baiting dogfucking fart huffing retard making a buffet out of a toilet bowl a "she" with a hard "S." I'm sick of pretending his hand is forced by Youtube like he's a helpless victim. When a tranny like Sodacat is caught doing the most evil shit such as dealing in child porn, Tom will absolutely sweep it up for him. He will enable trannies to commit evil if it enriches himself. Full stop.

It will always amaze me how Tom swindled this website into thinking he's some friendly entity instead of the exploitative charlatan who will gladly sell us all out so he can become some Destiny-tier goonclown that he is. We're not on his side, we're literally just his unpaid research team.
 
The video was obviously derivative and missing some important information, I'm unsure whether he omitted some information due to fear of strikes from YouTube or he believed that his viewers would not be interested in certain parts. I guess it is difficult to compress information about such a repellent figure within the narrow confines of a YouTube video that is appropriate for all audiences. Tom has to hold the line completely, as he would likely lose his channel if he covered a lot of incidents deeply like the OP and all 179 pages of this thread. He has little else going for him so he would be circumspect.
I did not watch the video, but I can say some of the information here is not sufficient as evidence from a legal or journalistic standpoint, and in addition, would not pass YouTube standards for other reasons. That policy is more difficult to navigate than the usual journalistic standards and runs counter to it in places. It's very thin ice and any number of things would warrant a strike because the sources are spurious and easy grounds for initiating legal action and the other content is just plain against YouTube policy.

You'd need a real legal team on retainer to achieve half the level of detail here and avoid a content strike while doing so. Some of the big boy investigative channels have that, and you see how carefully worded (and lifeless) their content is.

I'm sick of pretending his hand is forced by Youtube like he's a helpless victim.
The wrong action moves him off YouTube and into the alt-right podcast sphere with none of the audience. He's a useful idiot, one where interested eyes move here and discussion takes place off regulated social media and into forums and back channels. Then regurgitates itself on Twitter. And when he fails, another useful idiot will take his place.
 
Back