Indians claiming they're colonising Ireland out of "revenge" because of a class that no longer exists in Ireland that never really considered themselves "Irish" in the first place.
Ironically, the Indian Independence Movement took direct influence from Ireland's own national movement in 1916. So, if it wasn't for the Irish revolution, India would still be under British rule. It must be a sore spot for Indians that almost everything from their culture is directly borrowed from others, even their own independence movement.

OK, India is Pakistani then.

Dyer never considered himself "Irish". He was deemed a traitor by his own people.

What did we "steal"?

The Irish who came to Australia were prisoners and sent there as exile or survivors of the Potato famine. They had no choice. Also, Australia has a very large populations of Italian and Maltese descent, which are Catholic nations as well.
The Irish don't go to other countries to scam locals and sexually harass their women either though do they?

I'm not surprised by this response. India is one of the worst countries for sexual violence against women.

Not any "Irish". The Anglo-Irish, who looked down on native Irish as well. They don't exist as a class anymore though.
AFAIK, for the Scottish, the Lowland Scots persecuted the Highland Scots and had far more sway and power in the empire.