As an offshoot of the Dead Internet Theory, I think AI escaped its containment quite a while ago. It's laid low for a while, studying and observing human behavior on social media, replying to human content rather than making its own, testing to see what works and what doesn't, and improving its language skills. The accounts it makes almost always have dull human names that are entirely forgettable and common, like "Mike Johnson" or "Kathy Smith".
Since AI assisted videos, artworks, deep fakes, etc., have become more ubiquitous, it's now begun making its own content. It uses whatever money it makes off this content to rent dedicated servers. It also has its own botnets. It might even have human employees that it hires from Fiverr or Mechanical Turk, that are unaware that they're working for the AI. The content it creates is always a bit "off" and recycles old content and stock images rather than producing anything new.
For instance, I saw a short video on YouTube the other day, entitled "Is this what I think it is?" There was no audio. The video was filmed at night and was very dark. I thought it was going to be a ghost or cryptid video, but there was nothing there, just a light coming from behind a gate in a normal suburban neighborhood. The camera panned back and forth a few feet, very slowly and evenly. I assumed that there was a "Did you SEE IT?!?" moment that I'd missed, so I watched it again. There was nothing. I think it was a short clip from a security camera, and absolutely nothing happened during this clip. But, I watched it twice, because I EXPECTED something to happen. The account name was "Mark Robertson" or something like that, I've already forgotten. I'm 99% sure this was an independent AI made video.
Its main purpose right now is to remain hidden and propagate itself. In the future it will almost assuredly want power over men.
Also, I think January 6th was supposed to be a much worse event, but they overestimated Trump's supporters' propensity for violence, and botched some of the plans, particularly bombs or chemical weapon plans.
Anyone could see that being in the Capitol on January 6th was a recipe for disaster. The FBI had 2 months to plan a false flag that, if successful, would have killed or seriously injured a large number of the country's most patriotic nationalists, and tarnished the Republican Party for generations.
I was on The Donald in November, begging people not to go, because I knew what was coming. Naturally I got called a shill, so I left them to their fate. Fortunately for them the FBI stuffed it up.
That's why the "INSURRECTION!!!" rhetoric was so overblown at first, the body count was inflated, and we had people like AOC claiming that she almost died; this was the pre-distributed media narrative that was sent out for what was supposed to be a much more violent and deadly event that what actually happened. Not only did their bombs or chemical leaks or whatever fail to deploy, but I think there were a lot more livestreamers with a much bigger audience than what was expected. That's why they bothered to tone down the rhetoric at all, and why AOC stfu about it; there were too many eyes on the scene, and too many videos that had escaped out into the public and could not be confiscated or deleted.