US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
These two points highlight the humiliation aspect of the ad:
If it's literal, no man ever likes to share their tools.
If there is something that fascinates women, is men who follow the rules and do what they are told.
YOU’RE SUPPOSED TO SHARE, CHUD! YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES!
In a time of intense unfairness and lawlessness, pushing this expectation of obedience is an insult. It feels aggressively stupid— if I didn’t know better I’d assume the ad was aimed at pooners rather than actual men.
mine_mine_mine.jpeg
 
Regarding the Real Men Vote for Kamala ad, what goes unsaid is what Barak Obama stated yesterday: it’s black men who are distinctly unenthusiastic about Kamala. Niggers are extremely misogynistic, prone to jealously, and love to hold grudges. To them, Kamala is a high yella heifer who got her start by putting black men in jail and sucking dick. That she committed the ultimate betrayal of marrying a (((white))) man is the unforgivable confirmation that she is a dumb, disloyal hoe. Will they vote for her anyway? I'm curious.
Now explain why they refused to elect Stacey Abrams during the time the state turned blue.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Melee Bouquet
But I'm told he's a failed buisness man because 6 out of how many businesses he owns shut down
Any person who owns a business knows that business shut down and that many times you'll take a gamble. The people who call Trump a failed businessman and broke are wagies who can't afford groceries but somehow still think Kamala will fix the economy.
 
I don't think anyone really "chose" Harris. I think it was a combination of time and money.

Time because Biden's crash and burn was was totally unexpected, no doubt the DNC heads thought they could easily pull another 2020 win, but then the debate comes and everything suddenly implodes.

But the election is only 3'ish months away. If the DNC does the whole primary election thingie that could take up a month or even more. Leaving little time to create and grease the wheels of another "win" and with such a rush job it was even possible some undesirable like Sanders might win.

Also is the money issue. The Biden campaign was sitting on a fairly significant amount of money they had collected and while yes the DNC could trust the justice system to rule in their favour it wasn't sure bet that they could transfer the already collected money to the new candidate.

So what do?

Well Harris checks a lot of the necessary check boxes. Female, non-white and more importantly she's a known quantity. Harris will play ball, as she always has before, and better yet she's got a solid claim to the Biden cash cow. OK, well that's that then. Right? Toss out old Joe and slide in his replacement, get the MSM to start up the spin machine just with a new name and everything all set for another nice "win" in 2024. Easy Peasy.

Like everything else in her career Harris was just the right person at the right time in the right place.
 
If.they don't want Kamala, then who are the chumps pouring all those hundreds of millions of dollars into her campaign? Why is every other YouTube ad some appeal from her campaign or Obama himself? If they could have chosen somebody else, why didn't they?
They got stuck with Kamala becasue Biden suddenly dropped out on short notice after his debate and he threw the baton at Kamala. None of the dems with an actual shot at being president wanted to run because:
  • They have only a few months to campaign (you usually want at least a few years to plan and build up a national presence)
  • They are following up a trashfire dem admin (The pendulum is ready to swing the other way)
  • They are fighting Trump's cult of personality (He is an absolute nightmare of an opponent with a large loyal base and is immune to scandals)
So with the real players gone, hosting a rushed primaries would be an absolute circus as all the bottom of the barrel dems fight for the spot on the ticket further embarrassing an already humiliated dems. So the DNC leadership just threw their weight behind Kamala to avoid that shitshow. Plus she is pretty disposable so no issue running her in a doomed election.

The reason why they are throwing money at her so hard isn't because of Kamala, it's becasue of Trump. If the Dems left Kamala to fend for herself we would be looking at a sweep not seen since Reagan. So they shove money hand over fist to win over voters, they bribe polling agencies to keep the race neck and neck, and they are trying to get a fix ready for election night. If Kamala wins great, if she loses:
  • The dems save face by having a "close" race.
  • They are testing new strategies with Kamala that will be used in future elections.
  • They protect their down tickets by motivating their base to vote so Trump doesn't get a super majority in Congress.
 
Last edited:
If I recall correctly, I think some states with abortion for all are promoting "abortion tourism" where people from other states with big bad restrictions can travel there to have their abortion instead.

Maybe I'm remembering wrong, but I think Michigan is one such state welcoming women from all over to come get a made in Michigan abortion. I'm not surprised if it's true Whitmer was raped in her past and it plays a part in why she has such the hate-boner when it comes for "Reproductive Rights."
Oregon will pay for your flight and your accommodations while you kill your baby, at any time up until birth. Hell, the later the better, since there's a better stem cell harvest.
 
That wasn’t the reason. It was because his dementia-riddled ass blurted out a promise on the campaign trail to choose a black woman as his running mate.

It was a huge, strategic mistake that really only sunk in once they looked at the possible talent to choose from, and realized there was pretty much nobody. And there was no way that they could walk something like that back without getting a whole carton of egg on their faces/pissing off the proggies/basically shouting in nigger faces with a megaphone that they’re nothing but worthless tokens. The only one who had any sort of name recognition, “experience,” and a willingness to jump in the game was CumAllah.

It’s not that she was chosen as part of some elaborate, 4-D chess move. They were literally stuck with her.
Oh c'mon... they could've gone with Stacy Abrams.

God that interview where she realized they picked Kamala instead of her irrelevant ass was perfect.
 
View attachment 6510223

How realistic is this map, as things stand right now? What states would you flip? (as things stand right now)

Trump can survive the inevitable steal attempt that will happen in Atlanta-Metro Georgia, but he would need PA and NV.
I think this is a very realistic map, though honestly, I can't see him losing Georgia and also winning Pennsylvania and North Carolina. If Trump loses Georgia we should start considering things lost.

My Trump map currently has him winning Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania, but losing Nevada. That puts Trump at 281 and is his pathway to victory. In that scenario Trump can still lose Arizona to sheningans and win. He needs those three states though. I don't think there is any scenario where he loses Georgia and wins.
 
They are fighting Trump's cult of personality (He is an absolute nightmare of an opponent with a large loyal base and is immune to scandals)
Trump isn't immune to scandals. The thing is Trump has never actually faced a scandal. Don't believe me? What are Trump's scandals? Two scoops? His words taken out of context? Getting shot in the ear, and therefore no a "real" assassination attempt? Trump hasn't had a scandal.
 
View attachment 6510223

How realistic is this map, as things stand right now? What states would you flip? (as things stand right now)

Trump can survive the inevitable steal attempt that will happen in Atlanta-Metro Georgia, but he would need PA and NV.
Trump will win Georgia and Michigan
 
Any person who owns a business knows that business shut down and that many times you'll take a gamble. The people who call Trump a failed businessman and broke are wagies who can't afford groceries but somehow still think Kamala will fix the economy.
They been saying that years before Kamala started campaigning.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: derpherp2
And I don't think that these podcasters would have gone unscathed in 2020 had they invited Trump.

The propaganda machine worked hard and in overtime 4 years ago. It was downright dystopian (and it still is in many ways, but not nearly as bad now).
This is a big change I've noticed as well. In general, it feels like more (not explicitly politically conservative) people are starting to hedge their bets in case Trump wins, which is something you didn't see at all in 2020.

Imo, public opinion is shifting because the economy has been too bad for too long, Biden did fuck-all to fix it, and nobody thinks Harris is going to be any different. For my age group, many people were still in college in 2016, and it was the first presidential election that they had ever voted in (and they weren't paying attention in the Bush-Obama years). Now that they've been out in the real world dealing with real problems, I feel like the hysterical Russiagate/Project 2025-tier bullshit is having less of an effect. I'm seeing people IRL starting to grow up in real-time, and the ones who are actually getting their shit together are starting to get annoyed with their Free Palestine/Tranny Flag friends, because it's getting obvious that the latter group are going to be stunted broke manchildren forever.

You'd think after a damn-near decade straight of ORANGE MAN BAD, liberal hysteria would be at a fever pitch, but I dunno... It feels fairly quiet, all things considered. I'm starting to think the initial reaction to "THEY'RE EATING THE CATS AND DOGS" is going to be the last gasp of the Harris campaign.

The vibe I'm getting from everyone is more "Let's just get this over with".
 
Trump isn't immune to scandals. The thing is Trump has never actually faced a scandal. Don't believe me? What are Trump's scandals? Two scoops? His words taken out of context? Getting shot in the ear, and therefore no a "real" assassination attempt? Trump hasn't had a scandal.
One time he had the government pay for some people stay at one of his hotels at a greatly reduced rate.
 
Trump isn't immune to scandals. The thing is Trump has never actually faced a scandal. Don't believe me? What are Trump's scandals? Two scoops? His words taken out of context? Getting shot in the ear, and therefore no a "real" assassination attempt? Trump hasn't had a scandal.
Although @StarkRavingMad may sperg at me about this, I thought Trump mocking Serge Kovaleski was in incredibly poor taste. Even if Trump has a history of doing a retard shuffle to mock people, he should have known better. When that happened in November 2015, I thought his political career was over. How wrong I was. I also thought the whole January 6th situation would do him in. Regardless of how you feel about the event and the 2020 election, it was not a good look.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back