At least 400,000
French women and up to 100,000
Norwegian women slept with Nazi soldiers out of their own volition. No one forced them to. After nazis lost the tables turned and hundereds of thousands of German whores
started jumping on American soldiers' dicks.
Regarding your other point, foids always follow whatever their immediate circle says unless they can find a cause that jerks their ego and makes them feel morally superior. Veganism for example, once a foid goes vegan, she will never shut up about how she is a vegan and will attempt to force it on their boyfriend/husband and children. The moral causes militant wimmin choose to pursue are never positive, they are either retarded at best (veganism, body positivity, ....) and actively harmful at worst (feminist, blm, lgbtp, ...)
Whoever is in power. That is all. This is why it is no use
appealing to women politically with concessions. Prolifers need to gain power then protecting unborn life would be rationalised as a victory for woman-kind.
As for your second point, women have always been at the forefront of revolutions. A woman's commitment and resolve is far stronger than a man who is so often prone to doubt. I mean that as a compliment. Perhaps that is why there are more religious (in the emotional sense) women than men. Women don't plague themselves with existential thoughts in the way men have done. Most of the famous stories about religious scepticism and doubt are written by men. Theology is a male conception to understand religious experience. Men need it on some level in a way few women do.
A few pages back, or in some thread in A&H, we were talking about how feminised male Indians are. Hinduism, of all major religions, is the most irrational, at least, that is my surface level opinion (will Westerners ever understand it fully?) There is a link between these two ideas, I’m sure.
The feminisation of society has made distorted notions of eastern spirituality palatable to people. American Buddhists who talk of peace and love and how all is one, are in far less opposition to the status quo than a fundamentalist Christian who believes in Heaven & Hell, a concept inherently hierarchal and exclusionary. Better yet, those Buddhists are encouraged to tune out from problems as though religion was a recreational drug to be taken and not innately uprooting and isolating. Ecumenism and Universalism are also by-products of this mentality, stemming from female-led clergy, which has been a disaster for the Protestant denominations. I can’t think of one female priest or reverend who has stood up for Orthodox teaching.
People like to conform, the weak minded most especially, yet they also like to keep their sanity. They need meaning and to make sense of the world. So, they often placate themselves with a religious or philosophical system that can satisfy their desires, prejudices, and fears. They pick a 'truth' that’s like a comfort blanket, for themselves and for society.
There is truth to be gained from the Eastern religious, but it is not found in Western dilutions of it:
And then,' says Dr. Poole, 'I liked what you said about the contacts between East and West- how He persuaded each side to take only the worst the other had to offer. So the East takes Western nationalism, Western armaments, Western movies and Western Marxism; the West takes Eastern despotism, Eastern superstitions and Eastern indifference to individual life. In a word, He saw to it that mankind should make the worst of both worlds.
― Aldous Huxley,
Ape and Essence
As an aside, pantheism and disbelief in the individual soul seems to correlate with an apathy towards material surroundings. Why won’t India develop? Because its people do not care. China’s disregard for human life is because its people do not believe in individual worth. Everyone should worry about Eastern influence and their supposed solutions for the West. One might think they have gained a friend in an Eastern critic of Western tyranny, but often their solutions are far worse than what we have now. Westerners may cry and pull out of their arses ‘human rights’ and ‘equity initiatives’ to excuse their stealing, but we can argue and fight against those ideas. Those ideas have an ideological heritage we are also a part of. We do not have the same history with Eastern ideas. Kipling wisely explained this in his poem ‘
The Stranger’:
The men of my own stock
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell.
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy and sell.
I see cosying up to the fatty parlor users has been a successful experiment and they are totally integrating with the site's culture and totally not bringing in their draconian censorship fetish here as well
