Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.8%

  • Total voters
    417
***EDIT: Thanks to @Balldo's Gate, This message was from a fake account so my message is no longer relevant.***
That's not from Nick. That's a fake account.

Oh! I didn't notice that! I'll be more vigilant next time. Sorry about that! I added a disclaimer now:
2024-10-15 211159.png
 
To be totally frank, Rekieta's trajectory has made me cautious about every online personality as well.
Same. I was naive. I thought Nick was an exception, but he's an object lesson in the foolishness of parasocial relationships. I'm consciously resistant now to the impulse of wanting to interact with online personalities, as I should have been in the first place.

As much as I'd like to hang out with Null, another I would accuse of possibly being an "exception," he has it right and discourages any such thinking.

I'm still open to interaction in casual ways, but I'm not investing anything real or important into such relationships.
 
I don't do gay ops. I condemn that kind of shit
As much as I like your coverage and generally think you’re neat, Nick was saying things along those exact lines up through 2021 and into the first half of 2022. I remember Jersh streaming with him back then, explicitly telling Nick to please, please not be a gross retard, and Nick swore to him he wasn’t and never would be. And now we’re here.
 
That's not from Nick. That's a fake account.

The real account has a checkmark (given to accounts with over 100k subscribers, I believe)

All of the other messages from Rekieta in the below post seem to have a checkmark though

Nick must be really desperate if he's going after the thousand dollars or so Aaron made talking about Nick's kids while Nick was in jail. Can you imagine what kind of scumbag would ask you to give them money or maybe even subscribe to your Locals or something, and promise something in return only to never follow through on that promise?

See above. Retards are trying to say dumber shite than Nick, and are doing dumb shite in the vain attempt to succeed.

I don't do gay ops. I condemn that kind of shit
As much as I like your coverage and generally think you’re neat, Nick was saying things along those exact lines up through 2021 and into the first half of 2022. I remember Jersh streaming with him back then, explicitly telling Nick to please, please not be a gross retard, and Nick swore to him he wasn’t and never would be. And now we’re here.

Pretty much the above. Time will tell...
 
As much as I like your coverage and generally think you’re neat, Nick was saying things along those exact lines up through 2021 and into the first half of 2022. I remember Jersh streaming with him back then, explicitly telling Nick to please, please not be a gross retard, and Nick swore to him he wasn’t and never would be. And now we’re here.
That's a fair standard to have at this point. Acta non verba*









*That's Latin, Nick
 
That would be far in excess of the $50,000 Monty is asking for.
And he deserves every cent of it. Nick deserves to be broke, sleeping in a tent in downtown Minneapolis, in the last week of January.
That's the thing that slays me about that case. It became economically absurd to not settle it a long ass time ago.
Cows aren’t known for their good decision making.
 
I actually have a substantial update and can tell you why Nick actually hasn't been streaming. I was able to speak with Nick's eldest son and he gave me a rundown on what happened. Apparently, Nick fell off the wagon and it wasn't pretty. He explained that Nick went to go check out the liquor cabinet, and when he opened the door, he heard a metallic click and saw that the door was boobytrapped with a bundle of grenades. They exploded and Nick's face was all blackened with soot, and his nose was blown around to the back of his head. He pushed his nose back on to his face and said, "Well thon! I thuppothe you know THITH meanth war!"
 
No, it was absolutely awful. They had no proof or even a credible way to confuse the issue. There wasn't a hint of lying or even "well he explained things in a poor way"
Wait wait!! SEAN!! SEEEEAN!!! NO!!
obliterattttted.gif


Well, now that I've been so thoroughly corrected I'm gonna go get butthurt, stream get some coke stream while obviously snorting it (and denying it) and share it with my 9 year old. Balldo Out!
 
Do we have any way of knowing who this unverified rando really is?
Sean could verify with Null, but regardless I am pretty sure the account actually is him. He posts the same way he speaks on stream and the analysis he provided reflects his level of knowledge. Plus Sean reads the forum, so if someone was impersonating him, he would likely say something about it.

I suggest we require him to sing The Whiskey Drinking Lawyer and upload it here as proof.
 
I suggest we require him to sing The Whiskey Drinking Lawyer and upload it here as proof.
A "yes that is me" on the next stream would suffice, not exactly like Sean is some super secret anon who can't possibly divulge any personal information to confirm his identity. I was more surprised that it took this long to have an official account, though I had always assumed he had an anon account beforehand.
 
I'd leave teeth marks on the muzzle of my .357 before I did that
Good answer. While I'm not 100% certain he's actually him (nobody should be 100% certain tbh), he's certainly no Locals wine aunt at least.

I was more surprised that it took this long to have an official account, though I had always assumed he had an anon account beforehand.
I'm pretty sure he's mentioned his account well before August, so I'm under the assumption that if this is him, this is the "public facing" account, whereas another older account is where the "spicy takes" live.
 
Back