Containment Random Chris Updates

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Yeah, even if they are real, the police aren't going to do shit about Chris talking to an underaged girl online over a decade ago. As far as we know, he didn't have plans to meet up with her and didn't exchange anything sexual. Well, maybe he did talk sexual with her but we have no evidence of it and can't prove that he did. Calling her "sexy" and "beautiful" is certainly suspicious but that by itself isn't going to get him arrested.

Still a very bad look and not something that an adult should be doing, but even statute of limitations aside, the police aren't going to do shit about that.
The evidence we do have is strange in of itself. PS3 chatlogs that have somehow survived into the modern day from a unknown source. It's hazy at best. I don't know if they are real to tell you the truth without further information. It feels implausible that data has survived this long.
 
The evidence we do have is strange in of itself. PS3 chatlogs that have somehow survived into the modern day from a unknown source. It's hazy at best. I don't know if they are real to tell you the truth without further information. It feels implausible that data has survived this long.
I doubt it, I know Sony and Microsoft love to have archives of the PS3/Xbox 360 era, way after their discontinuation.

I am not surprised that Chris would be attracted to kids in such a way. He is a freak, a creep, a clown and a pedophile in my honest opinion.

I'm going to be praying to God for all of his power to be taken away and for him to live a lonely life until the day he dies of which God better send him to hell.
 
I doubt it, I know Sony and Microsoft love to have archives of the PS3/Xbox 360 era, way after their discontinuation.

I am not surprised that Chris would be attracted to kids in such a way. He is a freak, a creep, a clown and a pedophile in my honest opinion.

I'm going to be praying to God for all of his power to be taken away and for him to live a lonely life until the day he dies of which God better send him to hell.
None of the data you speak of is publicly accessible. We start back at the beginning: where did these screenshots come from? All of this is hearsay until the work can be shown.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: missnaptime
4. There is no evidence CWC knew her age, or any of the other apparently young girls and boys, from what I've found.
What, he doesn't have eyes? You said it yourself, the girl looks obviously underage.
. As I investigated further it became clear that CWC was obviously deriving some personal or sexual pleasure from these chats.

I never once called CWC a pedophile or alleged anything of the sort.
Why all the contradictions?
 
It's highly unlikely that these were fetched from the PlayStation Network itself as that would require someone with access to Sony's internal stuff to be able to access the data and even then, I highly doubt that such data would be retained on Sony's servers for so fucking long. The fact that the screenshots indicate a PlayStation 3's user interface leads me to believe that somehow, someone could have gotten their hands on Chris's PlayStation 3 in some capacity and dumped whatever data was on it at some point. Maybe with Linux's dd or something. I have many questions:
  • How did you even get this data?
    • Did it somehow survive the fire and then get sold as a result of the Financhu Crisis? He's sold old historical things that once had some form of significance to him before.
    • Could it have been snagged during the clean-up following the 2014 house fire? Something similar happened with Chris's school documents which is how we without a doubt know that he was given tard points on most of his school work.
  • How did this data survive getting fucking formatted and then physically damaged as a result of Chris's own tomfuckery?
    • How thorough is the console at formatting the hard drive? Does it keep enough data that it could be recovered if the right person knew what they were doing?
    • Given that Chris ended up getting a new system shortly afterwards, did the PSN allow people to download historical messages from newer consoles during its heyday?
 
The evidence we do have is strange in of itself. PS3 chatlogs that have somehow survived into the modern day from a unknown source. It's hazy at best. I don't know if they are real to tell you the truth without further information. It feels implausible that data has survived this long.
I appreciate your cynicism.

I'll tell you that Sony keeps a cache of all IMs and all IM attachments on their servers indefinitely, as well as a lot of other data. PlayStation Plus members, such as Sonichu, have more data stored than others.

On the PS3 IMs and their attachments are stored as .dat files. All PS3 HDDs are encrypted. The encryption algorithm is dependent on the model where the data is stored. Sony possesses a secret key on their servers that can be used to decrypt the data and verify its hash (to make sure its actually an IM being sent from the intended/verified sender and being sent to the intended/verified target). After it has verified on the server, the PSN, the file is then sent to the target, re-encrypred by the client, and stored. This allows users to view messages even when offline. But in order to receive the message, the client has to log in to their PSN account on the PS3. If I sent you a message 15 years ago, and you login today, that message will still be sent. From this point, the IM is stored in 3 places, encrypted in 3 different ways, one on the sender, one on the server, and one on the target. Even if both the sender and receiver delete the message locally, it remains on the server.

To learn more I'd strongly recommend viewing Sony's data collection disclosure for the PS3, and the PS3devwiki. Everything that Sony reserves the right to collect is collected.
 
On the PS3 IMs and their attachments are stored as .dat files. All PS3 HDDs are encrypted. The encryption algorithm is dependent on the model where the data is stored. Sony possesses a secret key on their servers that can be used to decrypt the data and verify its hash (to make sure its actually an IM being sent from the intended/verified sender and being sent to the intended/verified target). After it has verified on the server, the PSN, the file is then sent to the target, re-encrypred by the client, and stored. This allows users to view messages even when offline. But in order to receive the message, the client has to log in to their PSN account on the PS3. If I sent you a message 15 years ago, and you login today, that message will still be sent. From this point, the IM is stored in 3 places, encrypted in 3 different ways, one on the sender, one on the server, and one on the target. Even if both the sender and receiver delete the message locally, it remains on the server.
That then raises another question, why didn't this data surface sooner? We know people have gotten into his accounts before and were very much in a position to receive these messages (unless they can't be re-downloaded again afterwards), why didn't they dump any of that shit when they had the chance? They were able to dump Chris's emails and AIM conversations, but you're telling me that they weren't able to get a hold of his PlayStation Network data?
 
I appreciate your cynicism.

I'll tell you that Sony keeps a cache of all IMs and all IM attachments on their servers indefinitely, as well as a lot of other data. PlayStation Plus members, such as Sonichu, have more data stored than others.

On the PS3 IMs and their attachments are stored as .dat files. All PS3 HDDs are encrypted. The encryption algorithm is dependent on the model where the data is stored. Sony possesses a secret key on their servers that can be used to decrypt the data and verify its hash (to make sure its actually an IM being sent from the intended/verified sender and being sent to the intended/verified target). After it has verified on the server, the PSN, the file is then sent to the target, re-encrypred by the client, and stored. This allows users to view messages even when offline. But in order to receive the message, the client has to log in to their PSN account on the PS3. If I sent you a message 15 years ago, and you login today, that message will still be sent. From this point, the IM is stored in 3 places, encrypted in 3 different ways, one on the sender, one on the server, and one on the target. Even if both the sender and receiver delete the message locally, it remains on the server.

To learn more I'd strongly recommend viewing Sony's data collection disclosure for the PS3, and the PS3devwiki. Everything that Sony reserves the right to collect is collected.
That is a lot of words to say only three people at this point could have access to these messages. Server, sender, target. Which one are you? How did you obtain them? Like I know Kiwi Farms is supposed to be the internet hate machine that doesn't think and just doxes everything that moves... but come on bro. How did you get these? Unless you can answer that they might as well be scribblings of a madman. These messages are fucking ancient. You need to explain how in the world in 2024 you have them.
 
That is a lot of words to say only three people at this point could have access to these messages. Server, sender, target. Which one are you? How did you obtain them? Like I know Kiwi Farms is supposed to be the internet hate machine that doesn't think and just doxes everything that moves... but come on bro. How did you get these? Unless you can answer that they might as well be scribblings of a madman. These messages are fucking ancient. You need to explain how in the world in 2024 you have them.
he's not chris chan, he's not the sender. the target is the recipient of information, in this case, the girl in question.

so if he's server, does that mean he has access to other account logs? messages?? he seems to know an awful lot about how the psn network and sony keeps data, but that could also be educated guesswork. it could be possible that the 'source' is a sony employee/affiliate, but in which case, why release this info now??

i'm highly doubtful that these are legitimate - if so, why not be forthcoming, and post the full archive with appropriate redaction for legal purposes, child safety/law in general and anonymity of those chris spoke to? but it does make for interesting reading, if nothing else. it seems like a big nothingburger.
 
he's not chris chan, he's not the sender. the target is the recipient of information, in this case, the girl in question.

so if he's server, does that mean he has access to other account logs? messages?? he seems to know an awful lot about how the psn network and sony keeps data, but that could also be educated guesswork.

i'm highly doubtful that these are legitimate - if so, why not be forthcoming, and post the full archive with redaction for child safety/law in general and anonymity of those chris spoke to? but it does make for interesting reading, if nothing else.
There have been quite a few Sony server hacks in between the alleged PSN texts and today. That said a lot of it was targeted towards financial data and things like passwords. In that case, the only way I see this being real is someone trudged through one of those dumps, found Chris's old password, and accessed his account. That said, I find that a task even the most dedicated of A-logs would find a bridge too far. Occams razor suggests fabrication is the simplest solution to this problem. Especially since he didn't dump all of it. Almost like he needs more time to make more fake screenshots. Because every time we ask for more info, we are met with a brick wall. We are basically at this stage right now:
chalmers-simpsons.gif
And we still haven't seen how he got the data. Its a simple question. With a simple answer really. I doubt its more than a paragraph.
 
That then raises another question, why didn't this data surface sooner? We know people have gotten into his accounts before and were very much in a position to receive these messages (unless they can't be re-downloaded again afterwards), why didn't they dump any of that shit when they had the chance? They were able to dump Chris's emails and AIM conversations, but you're telling me that they weren't able to get a hold of his PlayStation Network data?
IMs cannot be recovered after being deleted by the client.
This is starting to feel like a gayops. If all this was true it would have been revealed a long time ago. The fact that we can't seem to get any info confirming the source is also a red flag.
That's also what I thought. I am going to appeal to my own untrustworthy word: It would be a mistake to reveal the source of this information publicly. I have already disclosed it to a media figure. It will be demonstrated.
he's not chris chan, he's not the sender. the target is the recipient of information, in this case, the girl in question.

so if he's server, does that mean he has access to other account logs? messages?? he seems to know an awful lot about how the psn network and sony keeps data, but that could also be educated guesswork.

i'm highly doubtful that these are legitimate - if so, why not be forthcoming, and post the full archive with redaction for child safety/law in general and anonymity of those chris spoke to? but it does make for interesting reading, if nothing else.
I can release the full archive but I don't think it will be appreciated. In the meantime, I've got a lot more I'll be posting soon. Again, nothing that really changes anything. Anyone saying that these disclosures matter are in a fantasy. This is someone who has sex with his mother.
 
i disagree. you have everyone waiting for you to be clear as to what exactly the full contents of what you're posting tidbits of consist of. 'i don't think it will be appreciated'; this is kiwifarms. do your due diligence by understanding the market of people you are trying to make this information and content appealing to. if its nothing that particularly changes anything, even more perogative to post the archive to add contextualisation to already long gone events.
 
That's also what I thought. I am going to appeal to my own untrustworthy word: It would be a mistake to reveal the source of this information publicly. I have already disclosed it to a media figure. It will be demonstrated.
A media figure? So a youtuber or some shit? Bro you are sounding more and more retarded by the minute.
I can release the full archive but I don't think it will be appreciated.
It would because it would prove you actually have this shit and aren't making it over the span of days and days. Dump it. Now. I don't trust you. At all. You joined on October 8 and started flinging some wild shit. Shit or get off the pot.
 
IMs cannot be recovered after being deleted by the client.
That leaves us with some possibilities:
  • The messages were never actually deleted by Chris or somehow managed to survive a format and physical destruction
    • As likely as it is unlikely. It requires an insane amount of mental gymnastics to assume that somehow the data managed to survive all that, but stranger things have happened.
  • These messages are coming from receiving end of these messages
    • This is extremely unlikely unless Chris was genuinely retarded enough to share Barb's credit card information with random strangers online. Chris would absolutely have known better than to share shit like that with random strangers online.
  • These messages are coming from someone with connections to Sony
    • This is also unlikely because the screenshots imply way to view historic messages from Chris is to use a modded PlayStation 3. Yeah, right. You'd have literally any other way to show these messages at your disposal including newer consoles or even an internal web panel, but apparently a modded console is the way to go.
  • These messages are fake and gay
    • This is very possible as you have done nothing but provide censored screenshots and clearly have the means to fabricate messages since these were taken with a modded console.
It would be a mistake to reveal the source of this information publicly.
Why or how then?

I can release the full archive but I don't think it will be appreciated
How? You're dealing with Chris's data and you don't think that it'll be appreciated if a dump of a console he has long since stopped giving a shit about surfaces on the internet?
 
A media figure? So a youtuber or some shit? Bro you are sounding more and more retarded by the minute.

It would because it would prove you actually have this shit and aren't making it over the span of days and days. Dump it. Now. I don't trust you. At all. You joined on October 8 and started flinging some wild shit. Shit or get off the pot.
You shouldn't have trusted me from the start. I have already offered @Null a full disclosure of my source, among others. They all seem disinterested. I'm not committing an opsec mistake to prove this. Assume it's fake for now until you receive incontrovertible evidence. Also, actually go through the effort of falsifying my claims and the photos. I'm uploading the full archive currently, although I will warn you it's not as interesting as you're expecting.
 
I can release the full archive but I don't think it will be appreciated.
The only way it would be underappreciated if the leak came from caden really.
ve already disclosed it to a media figure. It will be demonstrated.
So let me get this right, you don't want to get your informant in trouble. But you sent it to the media, which will probably get more eyes on it, then here.

I'm not sure how this logic makes sense.
 
A couple of years before this, Chris couldn't see the difference between a pic of Megan Fox and Vanessa Hudgens, or all the various Blancas he was shown. Chris' eyes are useless.
That is true. He also couldn't tell the difference between the voices that were all the trolls and GF's in his adventures even though many of them were supposed to be the same person. He is face AND voice blind.
 
You shouldn't have trusted me from the start. I have already offered @Null a full disclosure of my source, among others. They all seem disinterested. I'm not committing an opsec mistake to prove this. Assume it's fake for now until you receive incontrovertible evidence. Also, actually go through the effort of falsifying my claims and the photos. I'm uploading the full archive currently, although I will warn you it's not as interesting as you're expecting.
1729116570981.jpeg
<<< coal, probably.
quit being retarded, and make your point already with all of this.
 
Back