Porn and Porncows

If you look at her replies (see screenshot 11), she claims she makes 6 figures running a "cleaning company " that employs 25 people. It doesn't stand to reason that she would be running an OnlyFans account if she was successfully running a business bringing in 6 figures. Although she claims it's a "cleaning business". What could that be? Perhaps a laundromat?
Well she's not trailer trash, after extensive OnlyFans'ing, someone needs to clean the sheets (& the floor, & possibly the walls, & maybe the roof too if she's got a fire hose for a cunt), she might as well make an investment for that running business venture.
 
If you look at her replies (see screenshot 11), she claims she makes 6 figures running a "cleaning company " that employs 25 people. It doesn't stand to reason that she would be running an OnlyFans account if she was successfully running a business bringing in 6 figures. Although she claims it's a "cleaning business". What could that be? Perhaps a laundromat?
Maybe it's one of those naked cleaning companies where the dudes watch them clean then tip them like strippers.
 
Pour one out for the amateur couple I used to always watch and still sometimes do (she's just not in the mood sometimes, shut up). They nuked their account, most of their stuff seems to be completely gone. Some faggot redditor said they broke up, thats the only info I found. It made me wonder is it illegal to possess or re-upload their content now? Would it fall under revenge porn if one of them reuploaded it independently?
 
Pour one out for the amateur couple I used to always watch and still sometimes do (she's just not in the mood sometimes, shut up). They nuked their account, most of their stuff seems to be completely gone. Some faggot redditor said they broke up, thats the only info I found. It made me wonder is it illegal to possess or re-upload their content now? Would it fall under revenge porn if one of them reuploaded it independently?
It shouldn't be but it just might if you don't have all the facts and documentation to cover your ass. If you can concretely prove she uploaded this content for public viewing, her revenge porn claims would likely be negated as she chose to make her sex life a public spectacle. If nothing else, she might DMCA you.
 
So I have a porn related hot take and I think this is the perfect place to share it.

I respect the Bleached subculture, I don't like it as I do not like or watch any porn but I respect it as much as I can respect a fetish, because they are defiant. They enjoy what they want despite everyone telling them it is racist, they are kind of like us who kept using this site even after Keffals threaten to dox us and the whole internet hates us.
all interracial sex is degenerate imo. even though its claimed that white women hate their own men out of every race just know that brown women hate white men far more, they're all batshit insane that can't get over slavery/colonialism and see all white men as "ebil hitler colonizers".
 
It shouldn't be but it just might if you don't have all the facts and documentation to cover your ass. If you can concretely prove she uploaded this content for public viewing, her revenge porn claims would likely be negated as she chose to make her sex life a public spectacle. If nothing else, she might DMCA you.
They'd have to pursue it from more of a copyright angle then. I don't have their content anyway, but I wonder: theoretically if an amateur pornstar "retired", deleted all their porn then tried to litigate against someone holding "private" downloaded copies of that porn that they haven't shared, how would that play out... assuming you didn't buy it, it's probably piracy more than anything? For clarity, these guys just uploaded to free tube-like sites with plenty ads, don't believe they "sold" anything.
 
theoretically if an amateur pornstar "retired", deleted all their porn then tried to litigate against someone holding "private" downloaded copies of that porn that they haven't shared
How would someone who "hasn't shared" any of the porn, and has kept it private, even be under suspicion of having any of those deleted videos? There has to be some burden of proof before you can be charged with anything.
 
How would someone who "hasn't shared" any of the porn, and has kept it private, even be under suspicion of having any of those deleted videos? There has to be some burden of proof before you can be charged with anything.
I guess if it was somehow found out without them intentionally sharing. Maybe they're a retarded streamer who accidentally showed their "Downloads" folder for a split second and the pornstar caught wind of it, or they're a jilted ex involved in the porn bragging about still having it. I'm aware how unlikely the scenario is to even happen but just  theoretically you know.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: frozen_runner
What the fuck are you trying to tap-dance around? JFC that's annoying.

If you downloaded something an amateur couple published online, it's not illegal to possess it. If you hacked/stole private material they never intended to distribute, then it might be illegal to possess it (and the act of obtaining it certain is).

As for re-publishing it, unless you have written authorization to do that (from the copyright owner), yes, that would be something they could sue you for.
 
all interracial sex is degenerate imo. even though its claimed that white women hate their own men out of every race just know that brown women hate white men far more, they're all batshit insane that can't get over slavery/colonialism and see all white men as "ebil hitler colonizers".
Aw, dear. Did the Indian woman make fun of your dick and say you were sized like an Indian man?
 
Seeing that I'm a man who isn't fluent in cellphone hieroglyphics, I ask of my fellow Kiwis if the kiss emoji is considered too feminine and therefore validates the skepticism from the user comments.
I've only seen it used for sarcastic purposes from gay men. Otherwise it's mostly used by women. Men love the laughing emoji though.
That's always been sort of the joke about women calling porn whore's bodies unrealistic, it made a bit of sense in the playboy days
That's due to the high rates of plastic surgery, particularly labiaplasty. The jokes about "roast beef" apply here, even when there is natural variation in labial sizes. In porn, if they're too large, they often get snipped. There are even videos on YouTube of normal women seeking the procedure because their own anatomy grosses them out.
beyond demographics this is another key part, only in america did we have laws and culture that shoved stuff like "page 3 girls" into the same category as "double anal interacial orgies" being able to see regular nudity on tv or at the beach means less consumer demand for the hardcore stuff, the same way even the porn industry admits twitchthots are hurting their income. With less consumer need for porn you then have less people making it or selling it too
In highly conservative countries, the rate of porn consumption is the same. Twitchthots, unless you're Amouranth or established, don't make much money. And then if you do, you'll get criticized like Belle Delphine on having poor oral sex skills. They're still promoting the porn industry, just with different hands. Jews still own both, though - a rabbi for porn hub, a Jew for OnlyFans.

To reduce the consumer need for porn you have to treat it like alcohol or cigarettes: as an addiction that harms real people, affects quality of life and relationships, and rewires one's brain in ways drugs can't even compare. A reminder the average age of first consumption of porn is 11.
 
anyone hear any exact amounts women get for that treatment? it has to be 6 figures easily right?
Its based on the fame level of the woman, not really the acts committed against her. A famous white "Christian" can pull massive numbers, whilst some mutt gutter slut will likely not even get a return phone call.
 
If you look at her replies (see screenshot 11), she claims she makes 6 figures running a "cleaning company " that employs 25 people. It doesn't stand to reason that she would be running an OnlyFans account if she was successfully running a business bringing in 6 figures. Although she claims it's a "cleaning business". What could that be? Perhaps a laundromat?

She probably has a shared laundry room in her apartment building and pisses off the other residents and monopolizes the room all day doing laundry for sudshare, doing strangers' laundry for pennies.
 
If you look at her replies (see screenshot 11), she claims she makes 6 figures running a "cleaning company " that employs 25 people. It doesn't stand to reason that she would be running an OnlyFans account if she was successfully running a business bringing in 6 figures. Although she claims it's a "cleaning business". What could that be? Perhaps a laundromat?
6 figures in revenue is not the same as 6 figures in profit. There's quite a lot of office/apartment cleaning companies who are 'legit' who are mostly employing illegals with one white overlord woman who comes in and essentially watches them, poorly, to make sure they don't steal. After paying the help, she probably makes $25 an hour to sit on her ass, which isn't nothing, but not a glamorous sum.
 
Thot entrepreneurs are almost always lying. One day they are big baller crypto investors, the next day they own six gorillion properties, the next day they make six figures running a cleaning business, etc. These whores are on the beach every day and in various clubs or bars nightly but somehow they’re successful business owners. My money is on various money laundering schemes where they funnel sugar daddy and prostitution money through various businesses. Any cleaning services she provides that aren’t polishing some john’s dong are purely coincidental and are there just to keep up appearances.
 
Last edited:
Back