US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
What is actually the deal with Thiel? Is it that he’s essentially just a gay right wing soros?

Why so much hate by everyone on the right?
 
Last edited:
  • Late
  • Dumb
Reactions: Bindo and derpherp2
While you all were sperging, big news in Arizona, where the Democrat House Representative running for re-election, Ruben Gallego, had his divorce filings released. It's not pretty.
Some highlights:
*Divorced his pregnant wife two weeks before Christmas and before their child was born
*Said that the marriage was irretrievably broken despite his wife denying any signs of that
*Married a lobbyist fourteen years younger than him
*Tried to get his ex-wife to pay the attorneys fees
*Tried to keep the divorce proceedings sealed out of fear of harming his son (who was not mentioned anywhere)
*Tried to sue the Free Beacon and deny them access to the files for years, even trying to get the AZ Supreme Court to deny it

DNC or GOP, this is a fucking slimy move and I can't imagine why he wanted this hidden for an election year.
Heres the newspaper that revealed it and their article (can't find a good archive). I attached the PDF of the whole filing for your reading.
I don’t really get these attempts at character assassination anymore. They are all greedy faggots at the national level the question is will they advocate for shit I want to have happen? They are all shitty people, power attracts shitty people.

also https://archive.is/BJIXl
 
*Divorced his pregnant wife two weeks before Christmas and before their child was born
*Said that the marriage was irretrievably broken despite his wife denying any signs of that
*Married a lobbyist fourteen years younger than him

So his marriage was irretrievably broken by his wife being fourteen years too old.
 
Citation fucking needed.

I’m not saying a Trump win is a sure thing, but this “women love abortion and Kamala” is just liberal talking head cope.

Abortion isn’t a “women’s issue” it’s a white, upper middle class Karen issue. And they’ll vote D no matter what.

(Ffs, if you look at pro life there’s a fairly even split between women and men.)

Unless you’re the kinda of shitlib, short haired wahmen who hangs out on Reddit constantly, there are plenty of women who either won’t get particularly excited over Kamala or outright dislike her.
Read em and weep:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2024/Umass_Lowell_PA_Oct.pdfhttps://www.wsj.com/politics/electi...e-poll-october-2024-c3ca9414?mod=hp_lead_pos1

Two must-win states for Trump are on the chopping block. The other states don’t even matter at this point. This is why we see Kamala redirecting funds to Pennsylvania. She is sealing the deal.

Let’s step away from the presidency. The Republicans can’t even win senate races in Arizona and Ohio! The RNC is falling apart.
 
I don’t really get these attempts at character assassination anymore. They are all greedy faggots at the national level the question is will they advocate for shit I want to have happen? They are all shitty people, power attracts shitty people.

also https://archive.is/BJIXl
If it didn't work on voters, they wouldn't do it my friend.
 
Apparently more people viewed the Kamala interview than Trump’s last two town halls. Whether that is good news and for whom remains to be seen. 7.1 million saw it though.
Trump's team reposted the entire unedited interview to their YouTube channel, so at least the Trump campaign thinks it getting as many eyes on it as possible is a good thing for them.
IMO it's not really possible to determine the actual overall result in public response to it, since there's a deluge of Kamala simps that will say she owned the interviewer and won (as if it's a debate) due to dogma instead of actual content (these are the same people that said Biden won the debate that made him drop out).
View attachment 6533574

perfect example of that:

Reminds me of the story of some journo batting for gun control that went to a gun store to show how easy it was to a buy a gun on a whim, only to be denied for being a convicted wifebeater.
 
Last edited:
What the hell is even disenfranchised women. Is this like mythical category of women invented by cope and seethe. Cuz I am hearing the same shit from TDS coworker and there is no data for this.
women that are entirely reliant on men but are psychologically, socially, and politically incapable of saying that because their reality is built on the veneer of independent feminism. weak women without any personal agency that don't have any way to benefit from girlboss feminism. they will never ever admit they just want someone to tell them what to do, so they just kind of aimlessly drift around and levy accusations against other people opportunistically, usually but not always to little consequence. the zoe quinn's of the world. TDS isn't really all that different from the handmaid's tale derangement that you saw the same category of women do in more or less the exact same context, they obviously aren't concerned about a tangible problem or getting it solved, they're trying to manipulate other people into validating their emotions.
 
While you all were sperging, big news in Arizona, where the Democrat House Representative running for re-election, Ruben Gallego, had his divorce filings released. It's not pretty.
Some highlights:
*Divorced his pregnant wife two weeks before Christmas and before their child was born
*Said that the marriage was irretrievably broken despite his wife denying any signs of that
*Married a lobbyist fourteen years younger than him
*Tried to get his ex-wife to pay the attorneys fees
*Tried to keep the divorce proceedings sealed out of fear of harming his son (who was not mentioned anywhere)
*Tried to sue the Free Beacon and deny them access to the files for years, even trying to get the AZ Supreme Court to deny it

DNC or GOP, this is a fucking slimy move and I can't imagine why he wanted this hidden for an election year.
Heres the newspaper that revealed it and their article (can't find a good archive). I attached the PDF of the whole filing for your reading.
tbh for BOMBSHELL DIVORCE SECRETS this is pretty meh
 
If it didn't work on voters, they wouldn't do it my friend.
I think Trump is a good example that it is losing effectiveness. People don’t care what kind of person he is, they want to know if he’ll improve their lives or not. Their view of his character derives from that.
 
Tell ya guys what. I will make a deal with you.

No matter what happens on November 5th, I won't come in here and you won't tag me or post on my profile. Basically, I won't bother you or your hugbox and you won't bother me. We got a deal?
Lurker here, wanted to take my final chance to sperg and call you a nigger before the age of HHH comes to a close.

Nigger

But seriously, when you arent shitposting, you do have good takes.
 
Polymarket and PredictIt don't do that, but they all would notice that Polymarket has odds so skewed so they change theirs to reflect it (betting sites hate arbitrage players)
That isn't how these political betting sites work. They function more like options contract markets. One person places an order for a Yes/No share, someone else takes the opposite side at matching odds, and it creates shares. Polymarket, PredictIt, Kalshi etc. have no hand in what the prices are, they are simply the brokerage. Like I said in an earlier post, if these markets really are getting manipulated then there is a fantastic arbitrage opportunity here that somehow everyone is missing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back