Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Worst democrat support from Latino and blacks, unions, and white male voters in history"“Worst in a century”
Trump should use the slogan “We’re not going black”That "wE'rE nOt GoInG bAcK" at the bottom really is the icing on the cake.
CNN got the data from RCPI’m going to strongly presson that one, because it’s CNN, and I’m betting more liberal white women were over sampled to create this statistic. They never tell you how many they polled and in what areas, and these specific polls imo are designed to create an outcome more than showing real data. Trump could legitimately be doing worse with white women, but I’m not going to trust CNN’s polling data on that.
Bruh she angry now. The interview really did the thing.Does anyone really want to see this? She's more annoying than Taylor Lorenz.
View attachment 6533849
I'm certainly not saying that it's going to happen, only that, if it did happen, most people would accept it and move on. They'd find some way to rationalize whichever course of action leads to the least amount of trouble in their lives and go for that.Doom doom doom. People believe what makes sense. And that bitch winning is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Trump is going to win and at this point I don't think the establishment cares. They'd rather deal with Trump than a retard for 4 more years.
Okay, and? Gallup is better at giving the entire picture.CNN got the data from RCP
Trump should use the slogan "Kamala Harris does crack."Trump should use the slogan “We’re not going black”
I don't trust polls at all after the past few elections, one way or the other. It's super easy for the pollster to skew it by the "likely voter" metric and just who they sample (red county/state vs blue county/state)I’m going to strongly presson that one, because it’s CNN, and I’m betting more liberal white women were over sampled to create this statistic. They never tell you how many they polled and in what areas, and these specific polls imo are designed to create an outcome more than showing real data. Trump could legitimately be doing worse with white women, but I’m not going to trust CNN’s polling data on that.
Between the ability for the pollster to skew it and the fact that nobody under 50 is likely to respond to someone cold-calling them, it really is best to treat it just as bullshit stats for nerds.I don't trust polls at all after the past few elections, one way or the other. It's super easy for the pollster to skew it by the "likely voter" metric and just who they sample (red county/state vs blue county/state)
Like I said in the aftermath of the interview:Bruh she angry now. The interview really did the thing.
This close to the election, abandoning the media blitz does more harm than good. She has to stay out there, otherwise the lasting image of her will be this interview. Its either ride the burning wreckage of her campaign down and hope for a Hail Mary; or be buried in the inevitable crash.
That's not very joyful of her. Where's the joy, Kamala? Did you forget to take your Joy?Does anyone really want to see this? She's more annoying than Taylor Lorenz.
View attachment 6533849
Joy is gone.Like I said in the aftermath of the interview:
Polling is mostly useless for politics imo. I lied to a pollster recently by telling them I’m undecided, so they got false data from at least one person. Plenty of others can do the same no matter the area because it’s all self reported. Voter registration data to me is more accurate than polling for that reason, imo.I don't trust polls at all after the past few elections, one way or the other. It's super easy for the pollster to skew it by the "likely voter" metric and just who they sample (red county/state vs blue county/state)
The poster child for modern Yankee WASPdom who put himself in for a purple heart after peppering himself with rock fragments from a grenade he fired turns out to not actually be a bad ass combat vet, shocker. Lurch was sure as shit no Kennedy.You'd think that a dude with a Silver Star and a few Purple Hearts would at least have some commanding presence, but he did not.
Well you disagreed on the data on the wrong assumption CNN collected it. They did not.Okay, and? Gallup is better at giving the entire picture.
When she was in the delivery room, instead of her (((husband))) wiping the sweat off her brow, it was the OB/GYN and nurses getting the sweat wiped off of theirs.Three which is pretty strong evidence that doggy style gives you a greater chance to conceive because holy fuck there is not enough viagra for that face.
This turned out to more or less be bullshit. It was basically a Republican oppo group funding the whole thing.Are we just forgetting how his former unit came out and called Kerry a massively useless shithead?
I just fuck with anyone who isn’t a robot. If I’m playing a game or watching a show I’ve watched before it gets fun.Between the ability for the pollster to skew it and the fact that nobody under 50 is likely to respond to someone cold-calling them, it really is best to treat it just as bullshit stats for nerds.