re: "foreign interference" guy
I saw Trudeau throw Jordan Peterson and Tucker Carlson under the bus yesterday for being paid Russian shills. The thing is - I believe him, not because Trudeau said it but because it seems kind of obvious. But of course, it's a way to distract from the fact Russia, China and India have been running a cold war through Canada for probably the last decade but every politician was publically beholden to the Canadian idea of a cultural mosaic. None of those countries give a single fuck about creating a society built on multiculturalism as each of them believes they are superior or entitled or both in some way.
To suggest Peterson is a paid Russian shill suggests that Russia invests into his rhetoric, probably mainly the transgender issue. I can absolutely believe this but it also suggests they are actively running covert operations on the public.
And this will be a very unpopular opinion, but I've always thought Russia or someone else influenced the Convoy situation. I don't think this was a direct order from the KGB to rile shit up, I think they used a group of people who were already expressing a lot of animosity and stoked the fires through bots and accounts online to use a sort of subliminal messaging to begin to organize in the way they did. I really felt it was a targeted operation using disenfranchised people as a pawn to further general distrust in the government. This theory "reasonably" explains the use of the emergency act if Trudeau "knew" (whatever that means - by official sealed documents or by some gut instinct, probably the first) that Russia was involved. However, it would be pretty damn hard to explain how Russia managed to interfere enough to turn their own citizens against each other in such a dramatic fashion. I completely understand how/why people came to feel disenfranchised in the first place and such people are usually pretty vulnerable to suggestions.
Additionally, I think China and India are simultaneously running their own campaigns and there's a fair chance no one is actually collaborating together. It could very well be a cold war with four different nations who all have four different goals, which also kind of explains how it became so deeply chaotic so fast as China certainly has a major hand in the drug industry - both legal and illegal trade, and they single handedly caused affordability issues in a select number of cities along each coast while desperately trying to get inland (but stifled by our monopolies). I believe this could be both an obvious strategic land grab but also revenge on an adjacent British colony for their contribution to China nearly collapsing during the Opium Wars which very much still influences modern day Chinese beliefs.
India is obvious. India probably didn't even expect to be caught up in this cold war with such advanced players like Russia and China who are very well versed in war without weaponry. India, like all pajeets, thought they saw a free opportunity through a system breaking via this foreign corruption. So five million all piled in at once, bringing all the filth and politics of their home country with them and it plays out right in the open 95% of the time which is a great distraction for Russia and China who can not only influence the direction it takes but use it as a distraction to keep their own meddlings unchecked.
The major success of what I attribute to Russia's campaign (could be someone else) was using the same type of propaganda technique they use in the States on much more unsuspecting people. Our social contract was an extremely high trust society - we're just sitting on top of America minding our business, it's all quite boring and we've never been invaded - who would even want to?
Probably the countries who will quickly run out of square footage per living person or perhaps countries who will feel the affects of industrialization quicker than others because of its size and we still remain the second largest country in the world. Of which, we mostly could not defend on our own and we rely on our allies, which is primarily the reason one wouldn't want to present an invasion. Nor would the optics look good overall given how we never start anything with anyone either. Therefore, the best method is through ways that can't be easily seen by the naked eye. And without solid proof, the allies won't really care what Parliament bickers about.
As I said in the beginning, whether the politicians are knowingly paid for their collusion or ended up swept up in it through poor career choice, they are, at this point, all involved in foreign interference.
