𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
....YOu know I just realized these people are only doing these "permanent" migrations to "the ADHD social media" (Bluesky) as a overreaction to a fucking disclaimer message. Its not implemented yet, you fucking retards! Sounds like that they were getting a message that they'd been marked for death by Elon and will be hunting them down IRL....which honestly would be nice if that's the best way to ensure a message is sent.
Maybe this would be a great trap to see who would overreact and ban retards from acessing the website. But alas, this is the internet - nothing stops these oxygen consumers from creating new accounts. From accounts they themselves said they would no longer use. On a website they claim to hate.
 
I don't think blocking has ever been effective against so-called stalkers and harassers because it's easy to just... make a new account.
I think this must have something to do with this decision- they probably want to discourage people from making alternate accounts, as Elon has said he would like for everyone on twitter to verify their identity, which I’m sure is coming down the line.
Elons twitter is shit, flooded with bots in the replies to every post. Really obvious what a data mining project the whole thing is. But people still jerk him off because he owns le heckin libs or whatever lol. I’m good on all that
 
I think this must have something to do with this decision- they probably want to discourage people from making alternate accounts, as Elon has said he would like for everyone on twitter to verify their identity, which I’m sure is coming down the line.
So he can sell your information and rat you out to glowies.
 
1729176488427.jpeg
The first highlight is a clause that people who don't understand how copyright law functions always freak out about. It's granting them permission to show your content on other people's screens. Without that clause, they legally can't display what you post without breaching your copyright.
 
I was on threads because I was curious and its full of all those cunts shitting on men 24/7 I assume bluesky is the same.
I stay away from these kinds of areas of Social Media nowadays which means the only people I know on Threads and Bluesky are anime artists like and a few people I followed for so long. I figured Threads and Bluesky are the cesspools full of mentally insane Social Justice Warriors screaming of a time of Twitter before Elon Musk bought it (although that didn't make it better and turned into a cesspool of Elon Musk cocksuckers and porn bots(The worst kinds of accounts of the internet)). To be honest. As crazy as I may seem for saying this. I prefer a fat SJW cunt with a crusty mutilated vagina and ugly hair over a porn scam bot any day.
 
They love to talk about "freedom of association" as an inalienable right except when it's straight white males trying to associate freely with themselves.
I don't get the fuss really. They still can't respond to you if you have them blocked. They just can see you. You still have that freedom of association he's talking about, just now people can take screenshots of you and call you a retard
 
I don't get the fuss really. They still can't respond to you if you have them blocked. They just can see you. You still have that freedom of association he's talking about, just now people can take screenshots of you and call you a retard
The latter bolded text is the reason for the former. They don't care about a principle like freedom of association. When they claim that they do it's only to appeal to those who hold that belief but who are also too dumb/naïve to understand that they're only being presented with the idea because the presenters are cynically manipulating them with it.

They're pissed that people can still publicly see the stupid things they post. The "bad" actors that they talk about are usually not hyper malicious internet Nazis, they're just people who will archive their dumb shit and (correctly) call them retarded as you said. It's way easier to gaslight your enemies and the public at large when they can't provide proof of your stupidity. They want a monopoly on who can be the butt of the joke, who can have their history combed through to point out hypocrisies and wrongdoings, etc.
 
The latter bolded text is the reason for the former. They don't care about a principle like freedom of association. When they claim that they do it's only to appeal to those who hold that belief but who are also too dumb/naïve to understand that they're only being presented with the idea because the presenters are cynically manipulating them with it.

They're pissed that people can still publicly see the stupid things they post. The "bad" actors that they talk about are usually not hyper malicious internet Nazis, they're just people who will archive their dumb shit and (correctly) call them retarded as you said. It's way easier to gaslight your enemies and the public at large when they can't provide proof of your stupidity. They want a monopoly on who can be the butt of the joke, who can have their history combed through to point out hypocrisies and wrongdoings, etc.
And that's the insidious part. People have the freedom to critique your bullshit takes. But they don't care about that. They just want to control the conversation. That is retarded. If you didn't want to get yelled at, don't post your horseshit. Otherwise face the heat head on.
 
The first highlight is a clause that people who don't understand how copyright law functions always freak out about. It's granting them permission to show your content on other people's screens. Without that clause, they legally can't display what you post without breaching your copyright.
If you post to a series of machines that do exactly that, you've implicitly granted consent for other people to see it. However, if you have hundreds of millions of customers, some of them are going to file frivolous or even legitimate lawsuits and since you have a building full of lawyers, you might as well make it official.
 
And that's the insidious part. People have the freedom to critique your bullshit takes. But they don't care about that. They just want to control the conversation. That is retarded. If you didn't want to get yelled at, don't post your horseshit. Otherwise face the heat head on.
BUT I WANNA HAVE THE FREEDUMBS TO POST SHIT ON THE INSTANET BAWS!!! AUGH YEAH :gunt:
 
It seems like most deranged anti-ai artists and pornographers (no loss, really) will be migrating to the shithole known as blueshiftsky. So... eh, how long will it take for all of them to come back running to xitter...?
I have no use for a website that hides my own mother’s posts from me (no big loss tbh, but damn, really?) while forcing me to read whatever elon musks mother - who I don’t know, follow or give a rats ass - is babbling about .
 
i find it funny the block option is just a big deal, i always have find it useless to begin with as you can make a different account, use nitter or an alt, but these people would complain this much about anything that happens to this app, they could change the look of a like button and be like "UGH STUPID MUSK, IM MOVING TO LE HECKING TWITTER CLONE THAT NOBODY USES"
 
Back