I think the fundamental issue here is...like an amoral Nietszche right vs the sort of christian/generally normative morality associated with Fuentes and TRS?
Like, arguments against Israel at the end of the day are 99.99999% moral arguments that appeal to people's empathy, people's disgust at sadism or things like the finance minister talking about the Greater Israel plan with a smirk on his lips. Which is why keith woods and everyone in that sphere makes arguments that they do, as Borzoi and Striker put it-they are "decent fucking human being" arguments, Israel is bad because of x moral wrongdoing. Arguments against Israel that are more abstract simply do not have the same emotional force.
If you truly do buy Nietszche or even IDK Mein Kampf, then this just isn't going to work. So BAp's detractors have to argue its I kid you not "Jews pretending to be Nazis to make WNism odious, because some random account praised the holocaust as cool"
Personally...I feel like you can oppose Israel on the grounds it milks the US taxpayer, relies on the US to fight wars it should win or lose on its own, and isn't actually White.
But boomercons and evangelicals support Israel not just because of Christian dispensationalism but because they see Israel as a White/European state fighting brown hordes-subconsciously. So you get the Arabophilia in the anti BAP sphere.
One doesn't have to argue the AshKs are ubermenschen or w/e but I find BAP's reasoning more tolerable than Striker or Woods telling me I should cheer Arab insurgents because "they're fighting global Jewry".
Long ramble concluding...BAP and his orbiters Jewish or not argue that strength and the exercise of power is itself noble and virtuous. You can argue all day that israel is ultimately a racial enemy, or a drain-but this argument suits the actual right leaning electorate and elite, not "please cry for Arabs" its also a loser with the general public that has normative moral instincts and reactions.
Which White Americans(rightfully) find odious.
TLDR: The BAP sphere's support for Israel or ambivalent indifference is entirely consistent with their Nietzschean ethos.
CaptiveDreamer transposing a Mein Kampf quote on Netanyahu and being called Jewish for it is a case in point-are you really a "right winger' in terms of moral and psychological orientation or not? If you are, then at best you can say Israel is a parasite or a racial enemy or well Ashks are kinda neurotic and Mizrahi Jews are brown. So I don't think there is any deeper inconsistency here, if BAP was praising Jewish communists or w/e than the game would be very different.
Personally, I've always had the instinct if six billion people feel one way, I should probably feel the opposite. You know having that aristocratic spirit and all. The Palestinian cause, is the same thing-its the global colored world's march over White supremacy(even if imagined and phantasmic in this case).
So the BAP sphere pushing back against Arabophilia I think is very healthy and helpful. If some of them are Jewish bad actors, so what? Better the Ashks than six billion Julius Malemas and Patrice Lumumbas.