The General Antisemitism Thread - No excuses accepted here

[glue eater]

@The Crescent King It's actually way worse than the included screencap if you read the article, the accusations of rape reach to mid 50s, so this jew sodomized kids for 50 years while pushing the Holoca$h on the goyim.

Jews need to feel oppressed to justify their crimes and feel righteous, I think. If Hitler didn't exist they'd have to invent him.

 

[Hamsteroid]

Jewish men being sexually tortured by female German concentration camp guards who would avenge their torture by raping and killing them

I don't know, fetishizing victimhood and the subversion of power dynamics seems to be right up their alley.

If you want to get (((Freudian))), they probably projected their overbearing mothers onto the female guards to have an excuse to fuck them (to death).

 

[QQQ]

 

[Starscream's Loyalty]

What is it about Jewish men that they're so predatory towards women and children? Obviously rapists come from all races of people, but they're are so many high-profile cases of Jewish men being pedophiles/abusers - Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, Darryl Zanuck, Roman Polanski, etc. Combine this with how prominent Jewish men are in the porno industry (Al Goldstein, Steven Hirsch, etc.) and how Jewish women are so obsessed with the idea of being raped by Arab men they tried to make their fantasies into reality by lying about the actions of Hamas on October 7th, you'd have to wonder if there's something inherently fucked about Jews and their sexual psyche.

Spoiler: Related but Long

Perhaps that is their punishment. Being gross, perverted and hated. They really are no different than alot of Arab and African men. After all, God did turn a king into acting like an animal as punishment. Who's to say that this isn't a modern example? And with their dwindling inbred bloodline, it's morbidly fascinating, in a way. You would think more would connect the dots, but they only continue digging to a new rock bottom. I just hope Evangelicalism either dies off as more traditional denominations rise in numbers, or they wake the fuck up before it gets worse.

I've also been thinking about how some churches claim to stand with Isreal. Their reasoning is that it's the Holy Land and we must protect it. While it dose have biblical value and origin, I don't necessarily agree. That area had been wrought with conflict even when the Bible was being written. And let's not forget it was Jewish leaders that threw Christ under the bus. The Romans were merely tools. And Pilat was more confused/annoyed by the Jews' spergging out about Christ. So he literally and figuratively washed his hands of the crime.

What I'm trying to say is that you can see value in the Holy Land itself. But you can agree that sending money and defending most of its people is retarded. Especially at this point when many other countries are finically struggling. This is just breeding more disdain for the Jew. Which is most likely their plan, but like many beasts they've fed over the years, it will turn on them. And this next beast will be the world itself.

 

[QQQ]

They really are no different than alot of Arab and African men

Not really, jews are much better at conniving and trickery, which is why they use niggers and shitskins as their "tools" to destroy western civilization.
They're not smart though,, and they often lack self-awareness which is what ultimately will lead to their downfall.

You would think more would connect the dots, but they only continue digging to a new rock bottom

They don't connect the dots because they have not dug deep enough, those who believe that there is some secret cabal, Illuminati, the Jesuits, reptillians (this one is likely a psyop), masons or whoever else controlling the world just hasn't gone far enough. All of these listed above all tie back to THE JEW (as seen in my previous post of the jewlephant)

Evangelicalism

What even is this denomination? I've only heard it used in an amerimutt context

Their reasoning is that it's the Holy Land and we must protect it

you can see value in the Holy Land itself

It is the Holy Land and it must be protected from everybody, including its current inhabitants.

 

[Starscream's Loyalty]

Not really, jews are much better at conniving and trickery, which is why they use niggers and shitskins as their "tools" to destroy western civilization.
They're not smart though,View attachment 6542893, and they often lack self-awareness which is what ultimately will lead to their downfall.

They don't connect the dots because they have not dug deep enough, those who believe that there is some secret cabal, Illuminati, the Jesuits, reptillians (this one is likely a psyop), masons or whoever else controlling the world just hasn't gone far enough. All of these listed above all tie back to THE JEW (as seen in my previous post of the jewlephant)

What even is this denomination? I've only heard it used in an amerimutt context


It is the Holy Land and it must be protected from everybody, including its current inhabitants.

Evangelicalism is basically a watered down version of Christianity as a whole. They lean more into Christ's love than the basic rules to follow. You see many of them as street preachers. Unfortunately, they do not study much of the Christian theology or history of the faith itself. They a degree above the Unitarians, and they understand the Trinity. But they don't expand upon it or explain it. In my area, they are called surface-level Christians, or lukewarm. They don't acknowledge that there are legitimate enemies who wish to do away with them for good.

I guess I'm still stubbornly holding a tiny speak of that some younger kikes will knock off this shit. But I see where that can be viewed as stupidity too.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Evangelicalism is basically a watered down version of Christianity as a whole. They lean more into Christ's love than the basic rules to follow. You see many of them as street preachers. Unfortunately, they do not study much of the Christian theology or history of the faith itself. They a degree above the Unitarians, and they understand the Trinity. But they don't expand upon it or explain it. In my area, they are called surface-level Christians, or lukewarm. They don't acknowledge that there are legitimate enemies who wish to do away with them for good.

I'll add that that there's a very, very strong overlap with unaffiliated/nondenominational protestantism. Although Southern Baptists kind of fit in here given their involvement in moral crusading during the 80s and 90s. Which in hindsight got some things right, but they wasted it on Harry Potter being bad because it was about magic and playing a Queen record backwards says "it's fun to smoke Marijuana".

Before the 80s, these types tended to avoid politics, but went on to become part of the Religious Right-Neocon bloc before Trump peeled a bunch of them away and sidelined the dumb shit while supporting religious liberty, general pro-life, and weak anti-troon/lgbbq.

Their biggest flaw is they really don't understand doctrine/why the believe in a way they can effectively pass it on. This was already the case at their peak in the 80s-mid 90s. And just in time for the New Atheists to come along

 

[Betonhaus]

 

[Apteryx Retardi]

View attachment 6545248

According to /pol, it was a pajeeta.

Since pajeets are basically low rent jews anyway (without the money or intelligence, but with extra stink), and actually idolize jews...yeah, checks out.

Hopefully someone starts a hindoo cult that offers it's jeet members a path to becoming a jew (to get those shekels and khazar milkers). Which includes climbing into an oven.

 

[QQQ]

They lean more into Christ's love than the basic rules to follow

So, essentially, they belive in "Heckin wholesome Christianity be nice to everyone!!". I assume they obviously misinterpret the "Turn the other cheek" principle and completely ignore the context?

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

So, essentially, they belive in "Heckin wholesome Christianity be nice to everyone!!". I assume they obviously misinterpret the "Turn the other cheek" principle and completely ignore the context?

It was to do with the laws at the time. If a Roman struck someone at the time (which he could do, with his right hand, showing his superiority), a Christian was instructed to turn the other cheek so the Roman would be forced to strike also with his left hand. This would force the said Roman to lower his status to the same as the Judaean or Christian, in a very smart move. Source.

Because otherwise, if you were to attack the Roman citizen, you could be punishable by death. It's not enough to read the damn Bible, you must study the contexts of the era and of the time. Like why did Christ wash the feet of the apostles (because people walked a lot, usually wore sandals), and also a lesson of humility to teach them, etc etc. But most Christians don't read their Bibles, or if they do - they don't delve deeper into the customs of the time.

 

[Brahma]

It was to do with the laws at the time. If a Roman struck someone at the time (which he could do, with his right hand, showing his superiority), a Christian was instructed to turn the other cheek so the Roman would be forced to strike also with his left hand. This would force the said Roman to lower his status to the same as the Judaean or Christian, in a very smart move. Source.

Because otherwise, if you were to attack the Roman citizen, you could be punishable by death. It's not enough to read the damn Bible, you must study the contexts of the era and of the time. Like why did Christ wash the feet of the apostles (because people walked a lot, usually wore sandals), and also a lesson of humility to teach them, etc etc. But most Christians don't read their Bibles, or if they do - they don't delve deeper into the customs of the time.

Exactly, so much subtle meaning is lost for lack of cultural context or even downright semantic shift in words meaning.

Even something as on the face of it clear like "blessed are the meek"

For one, the word meek, in its original Germanic roots has more to do with subtlety, and stealth and suppleness than outright passivity, almost a paean to Bruce Lee style "be like water making it's way through cracks" etc.

and besides the Greek that it was translated *from* was praus which has a lot more to do with the idea of being well trained, or orderly or even capable of fulfilling the required task and purpose. Xenophon uses it and it's morphological derivatives to talk of war horses and other animals. Aristotle uses it in reference to people in nichomachaean ethics:

"Now we praise a man who feels anger on the right grounds and against the right persons, and also in the right manner and at the right moment and for the right length of time. He may then be called gentle-tempered (πρᾶος/ praos), if we take gentleness (πραότης/ praotēs) to be a praiseworthy quality—for ‘gentle’ (πρᾶος/ praos) really denotes a calm temper, not led by emotion but only becoming angry in such a manner, for such causes and for such a length of time as principle may ordain"

and goes on to warn against letting that instinct go too far toward some unnamed counter to anger, what I'd call passivity, not meekness.


Yet you'll get it today thrown in your face if you suggest that Christians have a duty to do anything other than roll over and die

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

Even something as on the face of it clear like "blessed are the meek"

For one, the word meek, in its original Germanic roots has more to do with subtlety, and stealth and suppleness than outright passivity, almost a paean to Bruce Lee style "be like water making it's way through cracks" etc.

and besides the Greek that it was translated *from* was praus which has a lot more to do with the idea of being well trained, or orderly or even capable of fulfilling the required task and purpose. Xenophon uses it and it's morphological derivatives to talk of war horses and other animals.

Very well said. It means for you to control your temper, not rise to provocation at the slightest of insult, because that isn't masculine (meaning, to show anger - as much as some "pagans" think). It's quite effeminate in fact. Having a good temperament and showing RIGHTEOUS ANGER when it has to be shown at the proper time is something else (such as nowadays, with what we face, or the provocation at what some dipshit does, that would be it). But just because someone would insult you KNOWING you'd be easy to be insulted is not it. Very good resource.

James Strong, with his resource in Hebrew & Greek helps to ellucidate a lot of works. It isn't 100%, but I could give him at least a 95-90% grade of trustworthiness.

 

[soy woah jaque]

 

[QQQ]

All you guys I wrong. It's not the jews.

 

[DoomsdayElite]

 

[Ambidextype]

Not sure if it's just me but I've been noticing the jews I see online suddenly insisting they are white after all and there's no difference between jews and white, I see that over and over again. Back when the anti-white narrative was fever pitch high, they were either silent or acting like it doesn't concern them but now they finally seem to notice muh holocaust card doesn't work any more. But I've gotta add how much I hate this typical pilpul they keep pulling despite even that don't seem to work on average people any more.

 

[Betonhaus]

Not sure if it's just me but I've been noticing the jews I see online suddenly insisting they are white after all and there's no difference between jews and white, I see that over and over again. Back when the anti-white narrative was fever pitch high, they were either silent or acting like it doesn't concern them but now they finally seem to notice muh holocaust card doesn't work any more. But I've gotta add how much I hate this typical pilpul they keep pulling despite even that don't seem to work on average people any more.

Just remind them how it's apparently ok to be racist against white people and all that jazz

 

[soy woah jaque]

View attachment 6053170

is there a version of this without the tranime?

 

[Hantavirus]

View attachment 6555929
All you guys I wrong. It's not the jews.

I like how the Illuminati and grays are also Jews

Not sure if it's just me but I've been noticing the jews I see online suddenly insisting they are white after all and there's no difference between jews and white, I see that over and over again. Back when the anti-white narrative was fever pitch high, they were either silent or acting like it doesn't concern them but now they finally seem to notice muh holocaust card doesn't work any more. But I've gotta add how much I hate this typical pilpul they keep pulling despite even that don't seem to work on average people any more.

It's preservation instinct, because of attached. Younger generations are seeing through the pilpul on the right, and on the left, the decade of "new left"/woke anticolonialist programming has worked a little too well. Now, Israel is seen as a colonizer, and supporting the Arabs victimized by the Zionists is more popular than ever; it doesn't take much brain power to connect that to what gentiles have suffered under Jews in their own countries.