Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
This is a good point. Sean only mentiones Nick when a superchat cracks a joke about Nick or on one of the dedicated Nick update/whatever streams. And even then Sean is sitting there just reading a court filing so it's not like he's out there speculating.

I'm actually most interested in people who WERE in Nick's circle before who left before all this. Emily Baker, for instance, I don't think she's mentioned Nick a single time and her whole channel is like legal drama, not to mention she used to be on Nick's streams quasi regularly for a while.
Emily will never speak of Nick publicly. She actually knows what she's doing as an entertainer and knows her audience. She won't expose that to them, lest she raise any doubts about herself.
 
Is this motherfucker still trying to claim that because they watched a reupload by Cog, with no commentary and editing, they "didn't watch my video?"
He seems to be saying both "I never said I'd win the Franks motion" and "I totally should've won that Franks motion" at once. The brain holes have reached a point he's just back to back making incongruous statements. Pretty soon it'll be terminal and he'll be stuck saying things that don't make sense.
 
So then I wonder if the chat-posting is a way to get around whomever is keeping an eye on him.
To add on to this, assuming he is being gagged by some party; I think it is likely that this party does not monitor Crackets through the use of this thread. One, because his comments on different YouTube streams have been extensively documented here and, two, it seems his tweet was deleted before anyone here was able to archive it

Is it possible the monitoring party has unfettered access to his social media accounts and so can delete anything he posts at will? If so that would require organised and extensive monitoring which would lead me to think it’s the lawyers (though I have no idea what the legality of ‘controlling’ someone else’s social media would be, it seems like it’d be a bit be too sketchy to be legal)

In any case, I’m sure it would ruin Cracket’s day if his wrangler found out the ass he’s making of himself in YouTube Live chat comments, which I imagine would specifically be difficult for a wrangler to actively monitor
 
Different tests have different false positive rates, so the false positive rate of pregnancy tests tells you nothing about the false positive rate of any particular drug test.
Remember that for April, Nick ;-)
The deleted tweet appears to be part of a second tweet storm which started around 11:30 local time and stretched until 3:30 in the morning in which he admits to doing a "fucking mountain" of coke. Clearly, Celeste has ordered him to accept whatever they're offering.

View attachment 6549948
(Archive)

View attachment 6549947
(Archive)

Not archiving the rest individually but here's his replies page.
(Archive)

Highlights:
View attachment 6549939
View attachment 6549940
View attachment 6549941
View attachment 6549942
View attachment 6549943
View attachment 6549944
View attachment 6549945
View attachment 6549946
Never considered we would have to keep telling Nick to 'pull up' almost 6 months after his arrest but here we are.
 
Emily will never speak of Nick publicly. She actually knows what she's doing as an entertainer and knows her audience. She won't expose that to them, lest she raise any doubts about herself.
I hope Nick goes to trial and I hope Null gets a camera in the courtroom, because then EDB will have to consider whether she should stream it or let it go to second-tier people like SEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAN and Legal Mindset. Streaming this trial would mean acknowledging that other lawtubers exist. She thinks of herself as above the drama, but deep down she is the alpha Depp wine mom.

By the way, I haven't seen any updates to the court docket, which would suggest that Nick has not taken a settlement.
 
The deleted tweet appears to be part of a second tweet storm which started around 11:30 local time and stretched until 3:30 in the morning in which he admits to doing a "fucking mountain" of coke. Clearly, Celeste has ordered him to accept whatever they're offering.

View attachment 6549948
(Archive)

View attachment 6549947
(Archive)

Not archiving the rest individually but here's his replies page.
(Archive)

Highlights:
View attachment 6549939
View attachment 6549940
View attachment 6549941
View attachment 6549942
View attachment 6549943
View attachment 6549944
View attachment 6549945
View attachment 6549946
"Mr Rekieta, this is your account on X sending the tweet "I did a fucking mountain of cocaine", correct?"
"JOSH MOON, LEGAL MINDSET HAHAHA SO MAD, KIWICHUDS LOST HAHAHA"
Actual future courtroom conversation, what a fucking retard.
 
He seems to be saying both "I never said I'd win the Franks motion" and "I totally should've won that Franks motion" at once. The brain holes have reached a point he's just back to back making incongruous statements. Pretty soon it'll be terminal and he'll be stuck saying things that don't make sense.
If Nick said something like “It was never a guarantee I would get the Franks motion, but I should’ve” it’d be one thing, but Nick is allergic to ever being direct with what he’s trying to say.
 
Is this motherfucker still trying to claim that because they watched a reupload by Cog, with no commentary and editing, they "didn't watch my video?"
Backwards Internet.png
The video clearly had a backwards internet on it!!!!
THEY LIEEEEEEEEE!
 
Is it based to be grounded by your parents at age 42?
Absolutely, you Scandinavian prude. It's unfathomably based.
Is that part of the trad lifestyle?
Uh, yeah. Deuteronomy 5:1–23. Very trad, highly Cath. Mucho Christo.
Or is it the libertarian lifestyle?
Um, of course! Being free means you're free to unleash your inner child by acting like an embarrassing problem-teen in your forties, and getting Mom and Pop in on the act! It's funny and weird!
 
Edit: I’m phone fagging. Initially quoted the wrong thing. And I’m just going to throw this unrelated information here too:
IMG_1008.jpeg
Nick didn't do what he just did because of "cocaine-induced psychosis."

Stop.

He did it because his M.O. every time he fucks up is to blame everybody other than himself for his fuck ups. He did it because he hates Sean for being truthful. For being the better man. He did it because he's a piece of shit. He can be a piece of shit regardless of his sobriety.

Going on Aaron's show, and also pay-pigging the guy who harasses the children of the man who is a witness in his criminal trial, is a fuck up.

He's a fuck up. But it's never his fault. Ever.

This is Nick in a nutshell. It's all him. Let's not blame the drugs.

Is this motherfucker still trying to claim that because they watched a reupload by Cog, with no commentary and editing, they "didn't watch my video?"
Yes.

The Judge explained why that's not the case, and everybody read that explanation, but the Judge is a evil stupid poopy head.

Nick is a legal genius. Everybody else is dumb.
 
Emily will never speak of Nick publicly. She actually knows what she's doing as an entertainer and knows her audience. She won't expose that to them, lest she raise any doubts about herself.
She’s probably scared Nick will team up with another pedophile and sexually harass her kids, that’s what he does to critics now based off what’s happening with Aaron.
 
...we're in for years of him crying that he only plead because of that damn dirty government.
Yeah, this is going to be his forever-cope. The gov't lied then railroaded him into pleading. He will do his lying-by-implying thing where he blames everyone else without actually saying it explicitly enough to be pinned down in an outright lie.

He'll lie, no one will believe him but the most retarded of wine moms, and he'll be left streaming for liquor and torta money. 5 Balldo Days, bish!
 
When I watched Imholte's appearance on Kino Casino, I thought all his lines about how much Kayla was in love with him and wanted to leave him seemed like cope or at least total lies, due to how exaggerated it was. I wonder if the actual swinging was between Aaron and Nick and the wifeswap was basically a mutually beneficial cover story.
Imholte admitted they were lies. He also admitted they were jabs at Nick, and he also admitted they were to mess with Nick because it's funny. It's funny to joke that your former wife swapping partner's wife is falling in love with you knowing she isn't because it'd make him seethe, but not funny to joke about using some guy's daughter's vagina as a cup holder, or preferring to rape said guy's son because them being male would make it more challenging. It's a simple order to understand.

What are you, a cop at Denny's?
 
Nick didn't do what he just did because of "cocaine-induced psychosis."

Stop.

He did it because his M.O. every time he fucks up is to blame everybody other than himself for his fuck ups. He did it because he hates Sean for being truthful. For being the better man. He did it because he's a piece of shit. He can be a piece of shit regardless of his sobriety.
I do not disagree that it's his M.O.
But "19.png IT WAS SEAN ON AARONS CHAT PLOTTING WITH HIM FOR SUPERCHAT MONEEYYY" when he knows it was him, is such a schizophrenic thing to lie about, even for Rekieta. It's hard to think he is not intoxicated with something when he does something like that.
 
Last edited:
This is a good point. Sean only mentiones Nick when a superchat cracks a joke about Nick or on one of the dedicated Nick update/whatever streams. And even then Sean is sitting there just reading a court filing so it's not like he's out there speculating.

I'm actually most interested in people who WERE in Nick's circle before who left before all this. Emily Baker, for instance, I don't think she's mentioned Nick a single time and her whole channel is like legal drama, not to mention she used to be on Nick's streams quasi regularly for a while.

I agree, but those were mainly the savvy ones who seem to take their business seriously and just professionally distanced.

The remiander as has-been's (like Faran) who for some reason won't just come out and share their side unless they get something out of it.

Is this the one about aristocrat/nobles? I remember asking this thread for the title by describing it in more detail to no avail. I know @Himedall All-seeing Waifu replied to me trying to discern the title but we didn't get it.

But no, he did not stop watching the movie afaik. Iirc I was playing a video game and heard him finding it out and the movie just kept playing. I saw the ending and the main character on the driver seat of a horse carriage chased by the rest of the cast, not sure what the context was.

I thought it was Salò or the film about Nero that was basically an orgy. I do not recall if we ever honed in on a final answer.

The government (local police) literally didn't watch Nick's video, they only watched Backwards Internet's re-upload of Nicks video! It's a travesty!

My God he thinks his fans are stupid.

But the watermark changes the artistic quality of the entire experience!

The first screenshot of the alleged Rekieta tweet was posted at 5:01 AM UTC.

The second screenshot was posted at 4:59 AM UTC and has a "edited at" time for Rekieta's tweet of 12:51 AM (likely EDT, as this would mean Rekieta last edited it at 4:51 AM UTC, or 11:51 PM local time).

The user who posted the first screenshot also posted a reply to a Rekieta tweet at 4:54 AM UTC. However, the tweet from Rekieta he was responding to has been deleted. There is also a similar reply to a deleted Rekieta tweet with a time of 4:51 AM UTC which likely corresponds to the 1 reply visible in the first screenshot.

This satisfies me that the screenshots are legitimate.

How people who are online constantly express profound ignorance and lack of forethought regarding the actual function astounds me. It is a magical black box they use as a vehicle to blithely convey their butthurt.

Is this motherfucker still trying to claim that because they watched a reupload by Cog, with no commentary and editing, they "didn't watch my video?"

In fairness, he many be trying to convey that they did not follow their own rules and mis-applied standards rather than the 'muh wuddermak' refrain. It is a cope of idealism--if the world were 'just', I would have won! He will posture as a woebegone, mistreated martyr.

One of the theories concerning the Cokestream is that he only deleted it from Youtube and Rumble hours later because April or Kayla (most likely Kayla, since April was in the room "participating") threw an absolute fit (and for good reason). Some people think that's also how he got the black eye inbetween the time of the cokestream, and when his mugshot was taken.

I like to believe somebody clocked him for fucking up epicly.

According to Aaron, Kayla throws things in fits of rage. That would be my speculation.
 
Nick just keeps stepping on rakes and screaming SEAN. Many such cases, sad!
It's hilarious how much Sean gets under his skin. More than the other Lawtubers. Shit like Nick is Sean's area of practice. He's seen hundreds of Nick's. And Nick does not like hearing how fucked up he is, and how it's going to go.

I actually feel sorry for the Barneswalker. Can you imagine having Nick as a client?
 
Back