US Infants died at higher rates after abortion bans in the US, research shows

By Deidre McPhillips, CNN
4 minute read
Updated 1:27 PM EDT, Mon October 21, 2024

baebee.png
The infant mortality rate was higher than expected in the US in several months after the Dobbs decision and never dropped to rates that were lower than expected, a new study found.
Cavan Images RF/Getty Images


In the year and a half following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision that revoked the federal right to an abortion, hundreds more infants died than expected in the United States, new research shows. The vast majority of those infants had congenital anomalies, or birth defects.

Earlier research – spurred by a CNN investigative report - found that infant mortality spiked in Texas after a 6-week abortion ban took effect in 2021, and experts say the new data suggests that the impacts of the bans and restrictions enacted by some states post-Dobbs have been large enough to affect broader trends.

“This is evidence of a national ripple effect, regardless of state-level status,” said Dr. Parvati Singh, an assistant professor of epidemiology with The Ohio State University College of Public Health and lead author of the new study.

In the new paper, published Monday in JAMA Pediatrics, Singh and co-author Dr. Maria Gallo, a professor of epidemiology and associate dean of research with the Ohio State University College of Public Health, compared infant mortality rates for the 18 months following the Dobbs decision against historical trends.

They found that infant mortality was higher than usual in the US in several months after the Dobbs decision and never dropped to rates that were lower than expected.

In the months that infant mortality was higher than expected – October 2022, March 2023 and April 2023 – rates were about 7% higher than typical, leading to an average of 247 more infant deaths in each of those months.

About 80% of those additional infant deaths could be attributed to congenital anomalies, which were higher than expected in six of the 18 months following the Dobbs decision, according to the new research. Congenital anomalies can range from mild to severe cases, and some of the most common types can affect an infant’s heart or spine. In some cases, babies with a birth defect may only survive a few months.

“This is the tip of the iceberg,” Singh said. “Mortality is the ultimate outcome of any health condition. This is a very, very acute indicator. It could be representative of underlying morbidity and underlying hardship.”

Other research has found that births have increased in states with abortion bans, and experts say that some of that increase is linked to a disproportionate rise in the number of women who are carrying fetuses with lethal congenital anomalies to term.

“Whether the pregnancy was wanted or unwanted, we know that many of these are pregnancies that would have ended in abortion had people had access to those services,” said Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, an associate professor in the department of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive science at the University of California, San Francisco. She was not involved in the new study, but does research abortion trends in the US.

Experts say that abortion bans can also affect access to broader health care, which can lead to increased risk for both babies and mothers.

“The well-being of a pregnant person is inextricably linked to the well-being of the pregnancy,” Upadhyay said. Abortion bans may affect access to and willingness to seek prenatal care and broader support systems, she said, and the barriers compound.

“People who face the most structural barriers in terms of poverty, lower levels of education, food insecurity, and other life stressors can’t access abortion care, and these factors also increase their risks of poor pregnancy and birth outcomes,” she said.

Infant mortality includes deaths that occur before a baby has turned one, so it is difficult to parse out exactly what was happening during the months that did see rates that were higher than expected, Singh said. But the timing – four, nine and 10 months after the Dobbs decision – line up with about the time that congenital anomalies can be identified in the fetus and a full-length gestation term.

“These studies are providing a signal that people aren’t getting the care that they need, and because of that, there are spillover effects,” said Dr. Alison Gemmill, a demographer and perinatal epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University who led the research identifying the link between rising infant mortality and abortion restrictions in Texas. “It’s never going to be the case that everybody’s going to be able to overcome the barriers of these bans.”

 
"We need to kill them so that they don't die" - how does this make any sense? They want to murder babies to stop babies from dying.
You're so close to get it.

It's about statistics and making health work easier and cheaper. Premature or ill babies need extra care, which many health providers might see as a waste rather than investment due to the small chance of actually surviving. Same logic Canada is using with MAID. It's also the same logic used by corporations to not having to pay women when they're at home taking care of their babies, but from the hospital and insurance point of view. Killing the kid before the kid is born and needs time, money, and resources to survive is way cheaper.

Also, those kids are not entering the statistics of babies dying of illnesses, which makes their boast of how they are improving pre-natal care somehow successful. If you abort the defective babies, then all births are 100% successful and all kids are 100% healthy. This also get rid of the idea that couples need to do full screenings and have healthy lifestyles before having kids otherwise they can have a sick child. Let's not get those crazy nazi ideas that you need to be careful with who you procreate.
 
The physical trauma of delivering a full-grown newborn is much worse than having it cut apart in your uterus in my opinion. Even if it's seated correctly to come out head first, there's still all physical damage that occurs (tearing, etc) for a baby that's going to die. If it has to be delivered via C-section, that makes future pregnancies potentially more difficult due to scarring on the uterus from incisions. The recovery from a C-section can be painful, too. Delivery complications like hemorrhaging as well. You increase the risk of pelvic floor issues and vaginal prolapse all for a baby you know is going to die soon. I personally support abortion for congenital defects that will seriously impact the life of the child, and in cases of rape. Both added together are less than 10% of all total abortions and can easily be written into law as an exception to anti-abortion law.

If I knew my baby was going to be born with Harlequin ichthyosis, I'd terminate it immediately. Fuck that!
You're describing first trimester abortion. D&C, vacuum aspiration, etc. At that stage, the fetus is still soft and small. Cut it up, suck it out. Easy.

Second trimester is so brutal they put you out for it. Better that then being awake for them slicing the baby apart over the course of hours. But it's still not really birth.

By the third trimester, you've run out of options. You're having a dead baby. Thing is, this is also the stage where many fatal defects are discovered. Harlequin ichthyosis is discovered during birth. Anencephaly is, if you're lucky, discovered at about 20 weeks. If you're not? At birth. Thus abortion has next to no utility when it comes to avoiding giving birth to a doomed baby. Pretty much all the nightmare ones are found super late. Life's fun that way.
 
Harlequin ichthyosis is discovered during birth
It's a genetic disorder that can be identified via CVS/amniocentesis in second trimester!
I believe up to the end of 2nd trimester, get that mini-Rockman out! If you neglected to get any prenatal testing or a defect didn't show until third trimester, it's out of your hands. No abortion unless the baby will kill you (rare). Delivering a Harlequin ichthyosis baby must be a horrifying thing to a mother. Those things are scary to look at. The eyelids. I don't think I could bear to embrace that thing.
 
It's a genetic disorder that can be identified via CVS/amniocentesis in second trimester!
I believe up to the end of 2nd trimester, get that mini-Rockman out! If you neglected to get any prenatal testing or a defect didn't show until third trimester, it's out of your hands. No abortion unless the baby will kill you (rare). Delivering a Harlequin ichthyosis baby must be a horrifying thing to a mother. Those things are scary to look at. The eyelids. I don't think I could bear to embrace that thing.
Amniocentesis is pretty rare unless you have a reason to do it, largely due to the increased chance of miscarriage. The overall rate is maybe 10%, tops. Basically unless you have a reason to suspect something - for example, if you're a carrier of something - you're not getting it. So the odds of discovering something like that via amniocentesis is extremely low.
 
Does this mean I should fully support abortion if I believe in gun rights?
No, but a serious understanding of someone else's position is way better than yelling SATANIC BLACK MAGIC (notice how poorly yelling RACIST SEXIST HOMOPHOBIC works against our positions?) Being pro-choice would fit in more with being pro-bodily autonomy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Topaz Eyes
I personally support abortion for congenital defects that will seriously impact the life of the child, and in cases of rape.
What if the woman or girl only came forward to report the rape and then seeks an abortion at about 7 and a half months into the pregnancy? And let's pretend there's no congenital anomalies or expected grave danger to the mother's physical health. Is that possible like conservatives often warn or just fearmongering? I'm not well versed in the science surrounding abortion or birthing.
Edit: Never mind. @Megaton Punch has already answered my question.
 
It's a genetic disorder that can be identified via CVS/amniocentesis in second trimester!
They don’t routinely do CVS or amniocentesis for that kind of thing. They rarely do CVs or amniocentesis now anyway unless it’s needed to confirm a downs or chromosomal diagnosis. There’s a risk with both that it causes a miscarriage and it’s very unpleasant to have domed most do NIPT now which is non invasive and risk free for the baby.
It’s an unfortunate truth that some really nasty things get discovered very late.
 
Can we talk about the fact that abortion ban barely increased the fertility rate?

In the first half of 2023, states with abortion bans had an average fertility rate that was 2.3% higher than states where abortion was not restricted, according to the analysis – leading to about 32,000 more births than expected.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Topaz Eyes
I personally support abortion for congenital defects that will seriously impact the life of the child, and in cases of rape.
In terms of rapes: we're currently going through the #MeToo era where two adult aged college students can get drunk, do the two-backed beast, and the man can be accused for rape. Yeah, no.
As for "serious health issues": take a look to Canada to see where that gets you.
Honestly, this whole argument in favor of euthanasia can be summed up in one word: Soviet. "You are a burden to the State, comrade. Ergo, you can not be permitted to live."
"Oh, they're going to die anyway!" We're all gonna be fucking worm food, eventually. Might as well blow your brains out right now.
"I don't want to prolong their suffering!" Life is suffering. But it's also about overcoming that suffering and trying to lessen the suffering of others.
 
I used to be an "exceptions for rape" person too until I realized there is no difference between a fetus conceived by rape and one purposely. The baby is entirely innocent. Then you start to notice how people, even anti abortion people, dehumanize rape babies. Its very despicable. Plus what @Day of the Cope said. Its not so open and shut.
 
It kind of does make sense in the case of fetal anomalies. They should be able to keep them and get hospice care if they want but I don't see the harm in aborting a baby who isn't going to live very long.
It's not the same as people who use abortion as birth control for getting rid of healthy babies. I think it's pretty dumb a lot of states with abortion restrictions do not have an exception for fetal anomalies.
My bro. Abortion, bar being morally fucked up, does crazy damage to the mother's body. There're all kinds if shit that can also go wrong and fuck up the host. Purely from a demonic practicality, it is better to give birth, then deal with the "problem".
All that, or just stop fucking, or cut off the birth canal and don't have kids. Liberals should promote that shit instead of abortion.
 
They don’t routinely do CVS or amniocentesis for that kind of thing.
They absolutely do if they start seeing signs of HI during an ultrasound in second trimester! The risk of spontaneous abortion from CVS is like 0.5-1% and amniocentesis is less than 2% (hovers more around 0.1%-0.5% from what I've seen in most studies). I'd risk it if it meant I wasn't delivering a demonic baby that literally will suffer for the rest of its life. Painful, painful thing to live through, HI.

In terms of rapes: we're currently going through the #MeToo era where two adult aged college students can get drunk, do the two-backed beast, and the man can be accused for rape. Yeah, no.
It shouldn't be considered rape if both parties were drunk. If you can consent to driving while drunk you can consent to sex while drunk.

I used to be an "exceptions for rape" person too until I realized there is no difference between a fetus conceived by rape and one purposely. The baby is entirely innocent. Then you start to notice how people, even anti abortion people, dehumanize rape babies. Its very despicable. Plus what @Day of the Cope said. Its not so open and shut.
I believe that any female under 13 should be able to get an abortion if they were raped by an adult. The child isn't ready for that responsibility nor is their body. Girls 14 and under are 5x more likely to die than an adult due to pregnancy.

What if the woman or girl only came forward to report the rape and then seeks an abortion at about 7 and a half months into the pregnancy?
You're stupid if you don't report rape. Doesn't matter what religion you're in, what culture you're in. If you're raped, you go to the ER and get the SANE nurse to swab the DNA from you. You are stupid if you don't do this. You don't get an abortion if you're that stupid as an adult.
 
Back