US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Oh?! Wat dis?!

A little October surprise of our own?

View attachment 6557632


Probably real. But like with the claims against Trump, unlikely to move the true believers.

Appreciate their hypocrisy being on display though.

It's sort of a bit irrelevant though as it's just Kamala's husband and there's no link to her, unlike the Hunter Biden stuff in regards to Joe. Politically it's just like gossip at worst.
 
The funny thing is, they could have had Trump, he was always on the Dem side of things. They could have had him anytime before 2016. He's been making political noises since the 90's.

the military industrial complex warmongers switched sides around the time Obama got in when they realized the cultural tides were shifting and they couldn't rely on the evangelical vote anymore and instead opted to blend in with the LBGT/civil rights crowd. most autists realized this in 2016 but now normies are finally coming around - the literal audacity for Kamala to graciously accept war criminal Dick Cheney's endorsement is so insane.
 
I stumbled across this video a couple weeks ago and thought it was worth sharing. apologies if it's already been posted but I haven't seen it yet. It really captures the atmosphere and insanity that was 2016, especially juxtaposed with 2020 and this year. If you need something to brighten your day I highly recommend giving it a watch:

man. to think this was 8 years ago.
“What charisma, what a run! Jeb, I mean. So courageous against that bully Trump!! Is something his mother most likely told him after he DROPPED OUT TO ME!!! What a LOSER! And no, I’m not asking you to clap.”

IMG_3496.jpeg
 
Last edited:
It's sort of a bit irrelevant though as it's just Kamala's husband and there's no link to her, unlike the Hunter Biden stuff in regards to Joe. Politically it's just like gossip at worst.
Does play to the narrative that she's a boring woman that even her husband got sick of her.
 
This is what they do, isn't it?

They make "gay" into homosexual, so that any old-timey stuff about feeling gay is now "hurr hurr" instead of heartwarming. They make "joy" into the rictus grin of a bureaucrat out of her depth, straining for an answer to a softball question while she thinks about which of her staffers she's going to make pay for her embarrassment.

They literally want to take the very words you have for happiness and pervert them, twist them into something with sinister vibes lurking just beneath the surface. It's like something out of 1984, where they will simply change the definitions of all the words you could have used to describe your happiness (especially the short, easy ones, since the intellectuals will still enjoy using the big fifty-cent words!).

I think we shouldn't let them do it. I think we should go right on using those words and pay absolutely no mind to those who would take them from us. Be joyful and gay. Stop giggling about it and take happiness seriously.
A lot of these people are commies. Or believe in occult shit. Not all of them.
We all work from the same language, but we use different dictionaries.
 
The left really needs their own Trump. Someone from outside the existing corrupt system who swings in representing what the less insane lefties want, in such a way that it also speaks to moderates and even the center-right. Whether such a being can exist for such a fragmented coalition is hard for me to predict - I really can't tell if they're all so foundationally incompatible and just held together by corruption, or if it only seems that way from decades of uniparty bullshit, much like how the left still labors under the illusion that the right is just dominated by christian fundamentalists.
To be a populist politician you have to run on popular issues by definition, meanwhile what does the left have?
Whites are evil because of their race?
A billion Haitians are a blessing?
Weird gender shit?
The Gaza obsession?
 
If I recall correctly, people would be shocked at how much minor nobility supported Communists during and after revolutions and how many time old Elite families ended up as senior party officials and the like.
This isn't just a communist thing either, a lot of the early(think beginning of the 1800's) socialist thinkers were former minor nobility who had some money or some power. There was also quite a few lesser nobility in the Jacobin faction during the french revolution. (not as much as the Girondin ( the classical liberal, merchant focused faction) )
 
Last edited:
Watch them claim this domestic terrorism from the MAGA crowd when it's likely from the Democrats.
I mean the dems would love to have absolute power where they can crush the evil right wing maga domestic terrorists and deradicalize them by having queer activists groom the kids of maga people.
From someone who has also been forced to move among them: It helps to reframe your interactions as playing the part of a spy in the enemy camp. I nod along not to agree, but to keep them talking so that I can better understand their motivations, observe their movements, and gauge their actual strength. Cataloging it in my mind like an intelligence report puts enough mental distance that I can wade through the bullshit without having to absorb it. And even though there isn't a conquering army for me to deliver the report to, I end up with a more accurate picture of reality to make my own plans.
As someone who goes to anime cons and is a big weeb I feel where @Drachenlord is coming from. It sucks when you're in an echo chamber irl and most of these people are indistinguishable from reddit opinions. So many people in the geek community think if you're not trans rights, progressive, anti Trump you must hate black and brown people. It's so insufferable because they push "black people live in fear of all police because police just murder black people for no reason!!!".
 
You imply that that's a bug, not a feature.

Big minds of the New Left like Alinsky, Marcuse, Kinsey, and Steinem, as well as their successors, intentionally ushered in the realignment of Marxism from "Proles vs. Bougies" to "undesirables vs. normal people".

They introduced the notion that all inequality, inequity, or disparity is inherently as bad, as if there's any equivalence between 1890's kids getting maimed in sausage factories is in any way comparable to forcibly removing dangerous and insane people from society.

Some people are marginalized for a very good reason. It's not just because everyone else is just a bigoted, intolerant poopyhead meanie.
The marxists in america realized in the late 60s that an economic revolution couldn't happen. So they turned to class warfare to bring about communism. going after the undesirables to rile them up to do their bidding. They don't really care about these people's issues. They just use them as shields and props.

They also realized that a society that reproduces itself from generation to generation, morals and values wise, will never have a revolution. So they marched through the classrooms and took over. Later on, big groups like the UN and Gates foundation helped them by pushing Common Core and SEL everywhere in America.
 
The left really needs their own Trump. Someone from outside the existing corrupt system who swings in representing what the less insane lefties want, in such a way that it also speaks to moderates and even the center-right. Whether such a being can exist for such a fragmented coalition is hard for me to predict - I really can't tell if they're all so foundationally incompatible and just held together by corruption, or if it only seems that way from decades of uniparty bullshit, much like how the left still labors under the illusion that the right is just dominated by christian fundamentalists.
They would have won in 2016 with Sanders as the nominee. He would have mobilised the democratic voters who rightly hate Clinton and either didn't vote or voted for Trump and the youth vote which didn't turn out at all.

Shivving Bernie for Hildawg in a public display of gerrymandering corruption signed their death warrant in 2016 and might only be topped in the stupidity scales by installing Harris this time around.
 
The really interesting thing is that AI pics are moving us toward a place where blackmail may no longer be possible. There are rumors about comprehensive blackmail networks of politicians, where they have to commit heinous deeds on camera in order to be supported for election. Is it true? Who knows, but if it is true, and now people are starting to expect AI deepfakes to be used for defamation, could all that blackmail material be instantly rendered useless? If someone had a snuff porn tape with a politician starring as the executioner, would anyone even believe it?
My pet conspiracy theory is that a big part of the surge in generative AI research and funding was due to rich and powerful monsters getting nervous about who might have copies of the baby-snuff videos they'd starred in. Wasn't long after Epstein's island was raided that artifical image/video generation got a lot of attention and made big breakthroughs.
 
The media have changed the narrative yet again that this election is a "referendum on Trump"

No it isn't, they only do this because Kamala has no new policies and is the status quo option in a poor incumbent administration.. She's the one that was in power the past 4 years to make you poorer, not Trump.
This election is a referendum on American freedom: on the left is
  • freedom to control your body
  • freedom to marry who you love
  • freedom to choose your gender
  • freedom from misinformation
  • freedom to use safe and sane firearms
  • freedom to come and go as you please
And on the right:
  • Big government watching what you do with your body
  • Big government watching who you do business with (tariffs)
  • Big government protection (presidential immunity)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back