State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Useful_Mistake]

He immediately starts off with "Pomplun lied" and continues to argue the exact same points he argued before.

Excuse you, you slanderous kiwifuck. The Masterful mind Rekieta put A LOT more whining about Imholte this time, which is clearly the one thing he was lacking to tie it all together on the lower level.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Nick is as addicted to being DENIED as he is to cocaine. Unfortunately for him, I highly doubt the MN court of appeals will do anything other than grant this a sensible chuckle before they decide not to review it.

Also this was filed on the last possible day to file it, way to keep up those Beardlaw Benchmarks.

Also, also this filing cost $550, not including what he paid WHITELAW to either write or review what he (Nick) wrote. That money could've been spent on cocaine or shitty tattoos, what a waste.

How embarrassing.

 

[Telvanni]

Oh is this new? He filed an appeal. This is a very extraordinary measure; you generally never file an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case until after the trial, because there's no point if you win.

The legal equivalent of

 

[Looseleaf Paper]

So if by rare chance the appellate court rules in Nick's favor, would all that happen be that he gets the Franks hearing granted? Or would the whole case be immediately in jeopardy since the Judge technically ruled incorrectly when not granted the Franks hearing so the entire procedure is incorrect?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So if by rare chance the appellate court rules in Nick's favor, would all that happen be that he gets the Franks hearing granted? Or would the whole case be immediately in jeopardy since the Judge technically ruled incorrectly when not granted the Franks hearing so the entire procedure is incorrect?

It would be the former

 

[Spergichu]

Nick has so much faith in this appeal and a potential Frank's hearing, he decided to publicly admit to being a cokehead thinking it wouldn't matter from a legal perspective. He's stopped huffing copium and is now mainlining that shit. Absolutely phenomenal.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Oh is this new? He filed an appeal. This is a very extraordinary measure; you generally never file an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case until after the trial, because there's no point if you win.

The word is "insane", not "extraordinary".

His motion was shit to begin with. To think it was so amazing it had to be granted and ask for discretionary review because it was denied shows he's actually fucking lost it.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

It would be the former

So Nicks filing is to put it in layman’s terms is;

“I demand the Judge to do “takesy-backsies” on muh case”

 

[WelperHelper99]

Nick has so much faith in this appeal and a potential Frank's hearing, he decided to publicly admit to being a cokehead thinking it wouldn't matter from a legal perspective. He's stopped huffing copium and is now mainlining that shit. Absolutely phenomenal.

I'll admit the absolute brazen defiance is impressive from a observers standpoint. I doubt however the Judge sees it that way. This was supposed to be a simple case. Nick is actively making it hard.

 

[Colonel Sugarlemons]

Edit: This guy's Facebook feed is.... interesting...

Further Edit: Looks like Brian was hired by FWL very recently. Poor guy probably has no clue what he just stepped into.

Spoiler: poost

 

[Polyboros2]

It would be the former

The funniest outcome would be, Rackets wins this appeal, gets his Franks Hearing, and loses it.

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

Nick's going to spend all of his children's inheritance on fighting every step of a court case just for the sake of his ego.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Nick is as addicted to being DENIED as he is to cocaine. Unfortunately for him, I highly doubt the MN court of appeals will do anything other than grant this a sensible chuckle before they decide not to review it.

SCOTUS, and by extension, Donald Trump, will save Nick Rekieta.

 

[SiggerNlayer]

Finally some fecking content

 

[Goofy Logic]

View attachment 6560654

Edit: This guy's Facebook feed is.... interesting...

What does he mean by "it will end up bad, in both ways, if the things going around don't stop soon" that sounds rather ominous.

 

[East_Clintwood]

Surely, Steiner's counter attack motion will get the case dismissed this time Herr Rekieta.

 

[Captain Manning]

View attachment 6560654

View attachment 6560657

Edit: This guy's Facebook feed is.... interesting...

Uhhhh... that's... really interesting...

It's almost like the poor guy wants to eat a gun after submitting this.

I STILL maintain Nick is running the show here. Not only is it a repeat of Nick's favorite argument, there is sooooo much whining about Aaron. Shit that a lawyer not personally or emotionally invested in this case wouldn't include, because it's totally irrelevant.

What does he mean by "it will end up bad, in both ways, if the things going around don't stop soon" that sounds rather ominous.

I know, right?

 

[TexOffender]

So If Nick keeps hammering this "He's a big fat liar" crap is the court going to sanction his lawyer?

 

[AnOminous]

Oh is this new? He filed an appeal. This is a very extraordinary measure; you generally never file an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case until after the trial, because there's no point if you win.

This is retardation on an apocalyptic scale.

 

[Hrothgar]

And BMJ fans were thinking that Rackets is just going to quietly give up his crown.