Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It looks like a post menopausal woman working in a commercial garage bay. Like there are tool chests and car bay doors in the background. Is this some History or TLC show?>woman comes to vote wearing Trump gear
<They tell her she can't
That can't be legal, can it? This is just going to provoke more people to wear trump merch at the polls, out of spite even.
He should have pretended to agree and then when the interview started, he conducts the interview as normal. That way, he can still maintain his image as a centrist while Kamala has nothing but lose-lose-lose choices to make:Rogan told her that said demands were not going to happen and Harris pulled out of the planned interview in a huff
I've seen anti-Project 2025 campaign signs in parts of my town when driving around with the phrase "Google it!" beneath "Project 2025" with a red cross-out thing on it. Just pile it onto the list of the American left's bogeymen.The bipartisan fearmongering about Project 2025 is weird, when it's so painfully obvious that nobody on either side has even read a bullet point summary of it.
I've never seen such a perfect example of people mindlessly parroting what everyone else is saying based on zero evidence.
You are missing the point. The point is if we would be having this discussion at all if the scenario was the same but the grandma was wearing Harris gear.
>woman comes to vote wearing Trump gear
<They tell her she can't
That can't be legal, can it? This is just going to provoke more people to wear trump merch at the polls, out of spite even.
California upspeak is really the worst one. Race to the bottom.I think it's a big shame. I love a country Southern accent just as much as a Long Island cawfee tawk one, the New England "I forgot my r" speak, and even the Midwest nasal affect. Instead we're all adopting annoying California upspeak. Tragic.
It’s not placating, unless you’re an explicitly partisan show that specifically caters to one side of the political aisle (which Joe Rogan isn’t) if you’re going to interview one candidate I think it‘s only right that you extend the same invitation to the other one as well.I don't understand why he feels like he has to placate leftoids by offering to have their numb shithead cunt of a candidate on so she can cackle for hours. They already hate his guts, he could remain totally silent and they'd still accuse him of interrupting her or talking over her because they're fucking crazy and live in an alternate reality.
That's not what I said.
I'm a lifelong Republican voter, but even I can't subscribe to Trump's lawless insistence that all executive power is vested in the President. The Constitution gives the President to lock up political prisoners without trial or ignore immigration law, not fire people who work for him. That's why I'm voting Harris/Walz.The bipartisan fearmongering about Project 2025 is weird, when it's so painfully obvious that nobody on either side has even read a bullet point summary of it.
I've never seen such a perfect example of people mindlessly parroting what everyone else is saying based on zero evidence.
I am genuinely interested in what you are talking about. Biden was ahead in polling and covid and the summer of love had people unhappy with Trump across the politcal spectrum.It looked like Biden didn't have a shot either in the lead up to 2020, then a thing happened (allegedly).
It ain't over till the fat lady sings.
Why should he care about being a centrist? He likes Trump clearly. Kamala wouldn't show the fuck up because she wouldn't do the show HIS way. So fuck her. He aint no cuck. He the Kahn.He should have pretended to agree and then when the interview started, he conducts the interview as normal. That way, he can still maintain his image as a centrist while Kamala has nothing but lose-lose-lose choices to make:
1. Continues the interview. She then fumbles and says some commie or woke shit. Least damaging since Rogan will also softball the interview, so she just ends up sounding like a dumb politician.
2. Walk out of the interview and complain she was ambushed. Makes her look bitchmade.
3. Call Rogan out for changing the terms in the interview, thus breaking the pretense of being the least bit adaptable.
So, while backing out is not technically the worst decision she could have made, it's far from mitigation because now Trump has an interview and she does not.
No, it isn't legal>woman comes to vote wearing Trump gear
<They tell her she can't
That can't be legal, can it? This is just going to provoke more people to wear trump merch at the polls, out of spite even.
Those laws are unconstitutional as hell
Probably not. I didn't know that was even a rule. I want to say maybe if somebody would be bold enough to enforce it AND take a picture to brag about it.You are missing the point. The point is if we would be having this discussion at all if the scenario was the same but the grandma was wearing Harris gear.
There was long standing rumor that part of the reason why Rogan wouldn't bring Trump onto his show was due to Spotify unofficially banning Rogan from having Trump as a guest. Hence the idea of Rogan having to give Harris her own episode too to preempt Spotify from retaliating against him for having Trump on the show and why Trump agreeing to do it with no restrictions on conversation gave Rogan cover to tell Harris to fuck off when she demanded it be staged with her only getting asked friendly questions and no pushback/hard questions.why assume he's placating? If he was placating he would have acceded to the demands of kamala for it to be scripted. He only benefits by hosting a 3 hour kamala meltdown, making her look bad.
To be fair I think he actually looks pretty decent for his age. Even performing and shit. Conning him into doing political shit like this is elderly abuse, though.
Speaking of spooky witchery, watch out for black magic this election!
The (mostly tranny) wackos on r/witchesvsthepatriarchy are invoking the dark arts!
View attachment 6565168
View attachment 6565169
View attachment 6565170
Fortunately, this spell two years ago didn’t seem to work. Must have been the moon or something!
View attachment 6565171
Sounds like anime shit. I blame anime.None of these are spells! You're just making a mess!
YOU DON'T CONTROL THE POWERS OF CREATION ITSLEF IN A FUCKING YOGURT BOTTLE!![]()
This bitch screaming in the child‘s face… holy shit. It reminds me of something though:A lot of how millennial and gen z dems spent all their time trying to make sure they stayed cool. Kids weren't cool. Travel was cool. Childfree boards called kids funny things, that would make squares and breeders so mad! Very funny! Crotch goblin lololol so random.
But these people were total marks. They bought into it 100% even though a lot of the original childfree stuff was cope from infertile people and forever-alones. People bought fully into the propaganda for the no-kid life being fun and free and easy, and kids are a drag who make your vagina loose and stop you from having real fun.
Over time, more and more extreme opinions got updooted and no one stopped the retardation from growing constantly more radical. They got more and more bubbled with each other, until they thought lots and lots of people must share their extreme anti-kid beliefs. Suddenly they think everyone will clap if they scream in a baby's face because "fuck them kids."
There was long standing rumor that part of the reason why Rogan wouldn't bring Trump onto his show was due to Spotify unofficially banning Rogan from having Trump as a guest. Hence the idea of Rogan having to give Harris her own episode too to preempt Spotify from retaliating against him for having Trump on the show and why Trump agreeing to do it with no restrictions on conversation gave Rogan cover to tell Harris to fuck off when she demanded it be staged with her only getting asked friendly questions and no pushback/hard questions.