Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Harambe]

Imagine the absolute shame and embarrassment his 16 year old must feel reading shit like "only cool people get to talk to me".
This retard is going to have a very, very rough time in jail with how smugly he carries himself. I don't want to invoke Mutts law, but....

then fuckin don't
Nick is a drunk retard but I don't look at him being smug and childish on twitter and think 'heh I'm sure black men will rape him for that'

 

[SlavSquater]

View attachment 6570778

Despite all my rage I'm still just Cuck in a (Balldo) cage

 

[Desktop User2]

It got expensive for Akilah Hughes, who ended up having to pay her own legal fees as well as Sargon's.

And unlike Hughes, you know Rekieta will be paying the rest of his life, even if the money comes from his granddaddy.

It would bare him no cost since Ralph made the same threat to @elb - and he has infinitely less means to fuck with her in court - almost verbatim and she complied. He knows she would just delete it, everyone asking for a fight is delusional.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

His 16 year old is going to change his name at this rate. He has to get bullied so much at school

School? Imagine what he has to listen to at home. "You're not cool enough to speak to me, nerd."

 

[LurkTrawl]

everyone asking for a fight is missing a market opportunity.

FTFY.

If you for some sick reason want to be the clips channel that gets the publicity bump of getting taken down by Rekieta, I'd bet there's money involved in it. Just have to be the kind of person who doesn't give a shit about what may come of it.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I'm late and gay, when and where's April's hearing?

The main hearing will be Kayla's contested omnibus hearing at 2:15pm today where her lawyer will raise the points that Nick's lawyer forgot to. It is unknown whether Nick will be in the gallery since the tweets from April give some reason to speculate they have potentially separated.

April's hearing is tomorrow and is listed as an uncontested omnibus. Someone said it was being held remotely. Not sure.

 

[Gloria The Glorious]

Every time I read "Coke" here I have to remind myself it's not the Cola and then my eyes sink in a little more in horror and despair at this man's SELF-BROADCASTED DAILY LIFE!

 

[WelperHelper99]

School? Imagine what he has to listen to at home. "You're not cool enough to speak to me, nerd."

I doubt he has a relationship with his dad at all at this point. Probably will never drink in his life.

 

[Annealing Crater]

I know absolutely nothing about law or the jurisdiction or anything other than stuff I've heard online, but regarding the copyright issue, there's also another factor in fair use. Factual works that are not creative (things like news, talk shows, podcasts, etc. that just talk about current events and stuff) have reduced protection and fair use is more lenient.

Recently there was some failing comedian called Brendan Schaub who sued an a-log for clipping his podcast and exposing embarrassing things about him. The judge tossed his case and gave a summary judgment in favor of the defendant's fair use citing the nature of the work as one of the factors.

Thiccc Boy Prods. v. Swindelles

The second statutory factor is the nature of the copyrighted work. 17 U.S.C. § 107. “This factor calls for recognition that some works are closer to the core of intended copyright protection than others, with the consequence that fair use is more difficult to establish when the former works are copied.” Campbell, 510 U.S. 569 at 586; see, e.g., Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 455, n.40 (contrasting motion pictures with news broadcasts). The second factor requires courts “to consider two elements: (1) whether the [copyrighted works at issue] are factual or creative, and (2) whether the [works] have previously been published.” Soc'y of Holy Transfig., 689 F.3d at 61.

The works at issue in this case fall closer to the factual end of the copyright spectrum than the creative end. See id. at 62. The copyrighted videos, which essentially consist of three men in a recording studio with a few lounge chairs and microphones recording a podcast on current events in popular culture and their personal lives, and which are basically the contemporary analog to television talk show clips, and which include reactions to the copyrighted material of others, are more factual than creative. See Nat'lAss'n of Gov't Emps/Int'l Bhd. of Police Officers v. BUCI Tel., Inc., 118 F.Supp.2d 126, 129 (D. Mass. 2000) (the use of a clip from a talk show without the copyright owner's consent was fair). The copyrighted works have also been published. 17 U.S.C. § 101 (“Publication is the distribution of copies ... of a work to the public.”); BUCI Tel., 118 F.Supp.2d at 129 (a live video is published when it airs); (ECF No. 51 at 16) (“[T]he Original Works ... have ... been publicly performed.”).

Because the copyrighted works at issue are published works that are more factual than creative, the second statutory fair use factor weighs in Mr. Swindelles' favor.

Nick's destruction of his own and his children's lives may have certainly been entertaining to watch, but his shitty streams are 'factual' works (despite his constant lying).

 

[AnOminous]

A: the permission was written. That's a contract. Breaching a contract can be difficult.

B. He let his copyright lapse and go unprotected for years essentially by allowing clip channels to clip him.

The second part isn't true, by itself. You can ignore 999,999 infringements and sue on the millionth. It doesn't matter. But granting an explicit license that people rely on doesn't really allow you to jerk the rug out from under them in a temper tantrum.

He can withdraw his consent to future infringement, but he can't just cancel fair use. He's posting his drugged out tard rages in public. People can do with that whatever the law allows.

“My principles were extensions of courtesy, my rights on loan to others.”

Now he’s trying to philosophize his downfall. Wtf is does word salad even mean?

"I am a cuck. I have cocks in my ass and cocaine in my brain."

 

[Canoodler]

Nick will spend more time flagging videos than he will with his own kids.

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

then fuckin don't
Nick is a drunk retard but I don't look at him being smug and childish on twitter and think 'heh I'm sure black men will rape him for that'

I assumed he'd be having sex in prison, but he'd consent to it...

 

[Popper Whiting]

DONT do coke and booze on camera? But this is America motherfucker! Nick has a God given right to speed 30mph over the limit in his mid life crisis Mustang while coked out of his mind, you NERD!

I am not saying a person doesn't have the right to dress up as a baby fur seal, snort Tusi (pink cocaine) and go swimming in the waters around the Farallon Islands in hopes of a blowjob from a Great White Shark. I am merely suggesting it might not be the most sensible idea to actually do this in real life.

I am not oppressing, I am merely advocating a more sensible position. Anybody (cough, cough......Nick Rekeita) who (cough, cough Ethan Ralph) thinks (cough, cough.....Dax Herrera) otherwise (cough, cough name your lolcow) is just a fucking retard who quite frankly needs their rights removed for the safety and well being of greater society. Polite advice not to do something is not a breach of a persons rights.

 

[MavisBeaconTeachesSnipin]

Well, there's the common English meaning of "hypocrisy" and then there's the Rekieta meaning:

View attachment 6570533

"hypocrisy is not acting an opposite to a stated opinion. hypocrisy is lacking the power to make the an opposite action irrelevant."



this logic and speech are waaay too muddled for a sober person. he's fighting with the dictionary now ffs.

 

[BigPeanut]

Someone should remind Nick that it's the audience which decides whether jokes are funny or not, not the "comic".

He’s a comics comic, a civilian like you wouldn’t get it, but us comedians find him hilarious.

 

[Neetorino]

I'm so impressed that Nick is still capable of retroactively taking away things I respected about him. I bet every single time he graciously "lent his rights" to clippers with one hand, but bitched about copyright with the other, he knew deep down that he'd love to bury the clippers just like Matt, Ralph, and Law & Crime. Muh freeze peach and all that.

You're a faggot nerd Nick, I hope you enjoy prison! Edit: I wonder what Our Wife will look like in court today, if she shows up at all.

 

[AnOminous]

He knows she would just delete it, everyone asking for a fight is delusional.

What are you talking about? Nobody's asking for a fight but Nick. People who ask for a fight often get one.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Is anyone here eating Kayla's Omnibussy today? What time is the hearing?

 

[Canard]

Whole copy right flagging is really pointless for Nick unless there is specific person to attack. As there are enough people at this point who will instead upload anything that gets flagged. Or even amplify it. You cannot hide your past streams from the Internet. Better not to even try.

 

[Desktop User2]

FTFY.

If you for some sick reason want to be the clips channel that gets the publicity bump of getting taken down by Rekieta, I'd bet there's money involved in it. Just have to be the kind of person who doesn't give a shit about what may come of it.

That would be an extremely niche market... re Elissa, she is opening herself to be bullied by everyone she clips, I think. Ralph had the dox and nude leaks attached to the threat but Reckieta´s is just flagging; either you believe your work is fair use or not.

What are you talking about? Nobody's asking for a fight but Nick. People who ask for a fight often get one.

A bunch of people are asking for a fight in this thread.