US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I know he's not popular on the Farms, but I'm with Razofist: bodybags for blackpillers.

I went into this election trying not to have any expectations, but given all that's happened these last few months I'm not going to get all weepy start screaming the sky is falling because a bunch of Twitter dipshits are out to make some lame comedian's joke the top story and a controversy that's going to end the Trump campaign. Fuck that bullshit.
 
I don't know if this was posted yet (if so still good to watch again);
Kamala has gotten away with a lot by leaning into her goofy wine aunt persona and playing dumb. In this ad her behavior is incomprehensible and repulsive to the point of being skinwalker-like. Clownworld is funny but this creeping up into Terrifier territory.
Whole thing, the funniest part for sure is the sheboons trying to coral the thing.
All this brown squabbling! News shows are just panelists talking over each other while they try to land one-liners and gotchas; I'm not sure what information is being relayed beyond "I'm upset" so I don't normally watch. Obviously I'm making an exception for salt mining on election night.
 
Michigan is very odd according to my brother. Outside of old women who dye their hair badly and the occasional Union worker who votes with their Union. He’s not really met anyone who is voting for her other than those groups. Black women are, but it’s not enthusiastic. It’s very much sluggish. Chaldeans, Muslim, Jews, and Catholics in South Eastern Michigan basically are for Trump. A lot of blacks have turned out for him in the state.

It looks like he might have more support in key areas to actually matter in Michigan even with the “fix”.
The polls seem to be all over the place for Michigan; 270 to win lists it as being +1.4% in favor of Harris, 538 puts it at +0.5% Harris, and RCP has it at +0.1% in favor of Trump. That's a pretty large degree of variance, and I'm not entirely sure why that's the case.
 
View attachment 6573617

A part of me doesn't want Kamala in JRE, but it would be so fucking pathetic I can't wait to see it. I hope it gets nowhere near as many views as Trump's podcast though.
They can't have Kamala show up to Joe's studio because they wouldn't be able to feed Kamala responses and talking points. She'd end up going off script and, as a result, would either complete freeze up or say something to fucking stupid that it wouldn't just reflect badly on her as a politician but terribly as a person.
 
At this point, I feel it's too late for Kamala. Traveling to Austin for a three-hour podcast a week from the election is too risky. Nobody likes to hear her talk and she's terrified of going unscripted. So in essence it's three hours in a state she knows she won't win. She already went to Houston last week and I doubt she'll be well received again.
 
View attachment 6573617

A part of me doesn't want Kamala in JRE, but it would be so fucking pathetic I can't wait to see it. I hope it gets nowhere near as many views as Trump's podcast though.
I'd love to witness the terrible train-wreck that interview would lead to but I can barely sit through the two-minute clips of her in this thread, I definitely couldn't handle a fucking hour of the bitch.
 
A part of me doesn't want Kamala in JRE, but it would be so fucking pathetic I can't wait to see it.
She would never do it because she only does carefully controlled media appearances
I hope it gets nowhere near as many views as Trump's podcast though
It wouldn't anyway. Nobody actually wants to hear what Kamala has to say
 
Good on Rogan for not kowtowing to her demands.
Shes like one of those spoiled rich kids who get through life by everyone doing what they want until they graduate into the real world and get slapped in the face by reality.

except she managed to stay inside the curated california democrat greenhouse, the perfect environ for whoring and back stabbing and now in the real world she can't compete.
 
Remember folks, the blackpill is a suppository -- you're supposed to take it and shove it up your ass.

View attachment 6573617

A part of me doesn't want Kamala in JRE, but it would be so fucking pathetic I can't wait to see it. I hope it gets nowhere near as many views as Trump's podcast though.
You just know they'd try and fuck with the interview. Like the Fox interview where they had 4 different retard wranglers just off screen screaming SHUT IT DOWN as it became more and more obvious she was too fucking retarded and he wasn't actually going give her a velvet handjob.
 
View attachment 6573617

A part of me doesn't want Kamala in JRE, but it would be so fucking pathetic I can't wait to see it. I hope it gets nowhere near as many views as Trump's podcast though.

>She only wanted to do an hour

Yeah, that would suck ass, it's only really any good when it's a long episode, and she obviously only wants an hour because she has fuck all to talk about, so Joe nor the audience would get a chance to see who she is. I doubt it'd get as many views as Trump's if it still does happen before Election Day.


The polls seem to be all over the place for Michigan; 270 to win lists it as being +1.4% in favor of Harris, 538 puts it at +0.5% Harris, and RCP has it at +0.1% in favor of Trump. That's a pretty large degree of variance, and I'm not entirely sure why that's the case.

Pretty much all these states are well within the margin of error, the only "safe" states are the ones we already know are going a certain way like Alabama for Trump or Cali for Kamala. Cautious optimism basically.
 
Are we really going to mark fucking Puerto Rico as some national issue, fuck off Kamala you psyop witch.

Puerto Rico should be glassed.

It’s clear that this moment will be held up as the "October surprise," handed directly to the Democrats from a Trump rally. They’ll likely amplify this right through to Election Day, using it to rally their base and frame the narrative in Pennsylvania and beyond. And it's a strategic two-fold: if the Democrats "fortify the election", they can point to moments like this as justifications for Trump’s loss, sidestepping other factors, and in that sense, it’s a gift for his opponents.

But it also raises a deeper question that goes beyond the punchline of a joke. Are we at a point where a moment like this shapes the fate of a presidency? If so, it says a lot about where we are as a country, about the weight we place on single moments over comprehensive leadership. It’s a moment for voters to consider what’s at stake and to weigh the long-term impact of their choices, including what kind of leadership they envision. We’ll see soon enough what resonates most with Americans, but know the Dems will use any opportunity they can to undermine another Trump presidency.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back