Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
In Nick's latest conspiracy theory, "someone" gathered up out of "context" quotes of Nick talking about religious matters and passed them on to the pastor of his church. This apparently was part of poisoning the pastor's mind against his former good friend Nick leading to the report on Nick as a bad parent to the authorities and presumably also led indirectly to the search warrant being issued against him.
Honestly, Nick had better hope they were taken out of context, in context the totality of his “Christian” beliefs would have caused the various sides of the Thirty Years War to reexamine how different they really were, and band together. Catholic alongside Calvinist alongside Lutheran, to stamp out the Balldonian heresy.
 
How the fuck did Nick ever become a lawyer?! First it's drug-fueled child neglect, then a Swinger arrangement with some other creeps, now he's paying off pregnant strippers (i read the messages, i understand he claims it's some poor jamaican woman he wanted to help out, which i don't buy for a second). This all fucking screams white trash trailer park instead of law degree and a house in the 'burbs, like what the fuck?
 
Update: Nick and I exchanged our last messages today. Then he blocked me.

View attachment 6575624

Blocked proof-
Link to the beginning of our dms- https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-19681596
"For the last time! Kayla and I did not fuck any Jamaican dancers, we just 'hung out' with them...." 🥃:really:
right...

ppp.png
 
So perhaps during the trial or during the appeal we will be hearing more about Nick's religious views perhaps either in the context of calling the pastor to the stand or maybe from Nick himself if he takes the stand to set the record straight.
Oh, yeah. That'll be a trip.

Q: "Mr. Rekieta, do you believe in God?"
A: "Yes, I do."
Q: "And is God in this room right now?"
A: "No, he's currently in a mansion in L.A. right now. He'd be here, but apparently he broke his leg again."
Q: "Uhhh... okay. How about Jesus?"
A. "You're looking at him!"

:really:
 
So I believe the ghoulish wife wanted to divorce, she said “nick, I’m going to leave you. Or you can let me fuck and suck black dick for cock” nick folded and then turned to drugs to cope.

Pretty sure that’s what lead to hedo in the first place.
People like to pretend he corrupted her, but she’s always been a known fucking whore and was all over Andy warski and the other guys back at knoxville.

They are both disgusting freaks, no one corrupted anyone, they are both equally degenerate junkies and perverts.
 
Come on, it would obviously be the one literally named after coke
View attachment 6575802
Now now, Angel Dust would be insulted to insinuate someone as Debased as Nick would be a follower.

Angel Dust is honest about his Degeneracy and would hate that Nick lies about it.
 
Here are the screen captures I took for all the participants. Also one of some of they folks interrupting the hearing were identified by youtubers live streaming on this post by Doom. Who is Ethan Hawk mentioned? https://youtu.be/8Viv7Nv-bQk
 

Attachments

  • Snap1049.jpg
    Snap1049.jpg
    98 KB · Views: 19
  • Snap1048.jpg
    Snap1048.jpg
    280.8 KB · Views: 21
  • Snap1047.jpg
    Snap1047.jpg
    378.8 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Has anyone theorized that the $1K was blackmail? The two bulls looked Nick up and found his thread here. So they messaged him that unless he paid they’d post a video of at Hedonism here for everyone to laugh at?
Nah, why would Nick bring it up at all if it was blackmail? He'd only bring it up if he thought it would make him look like a good person (like helping a poor stripper keep her job)
 
Has anyone theorized that the $1K was blackmail? The two bulls looked Nick up and found his thread here. So they messaged him that unless he paid they’d post a video of at Hedonism here for everyone to laugh at?
No, because the Hedonism trip(s) were before the thread turned on him, and I think he followed them on social media during or not long after that trip.

Correction: Only the first Hedonism trip was before the thread turned on him. I forgot the second was so late.
 
Last edited:
No, because the Hedonism trip(s) were before the thread turned on him, and I think he followed them on social media during or not long after that trip.

Indeed, the Hedonism trip is one of the reasons the thread turned on him. And it took a while to suss out where he went. That, and the Balldo, and the constant sex talk.
He went twice, as far as anyone can tell.
The first was in August 2022.
The second time was in June 2023, right after the "Do you know Mandy?" stream, and that's when he followed the two employees.

More or less everyone who has looked at this from a guidelines sentencing POV have concluded it's unlikely, but Nick is really pushing the boundaries, almost as if he's trying to speedrun what justifies an upward deviation. Nothing he's charged with would ordinarily result in such a sentence.

Courts are often reluctant to do upward deviations because of the difficulty of justifying them and the opportunities for appeal. Upward deviations generally require factual findings, on the record, in a trial or at least an evidentiary hearing. The finder of fact, which is the jury or the judge in a bench trial, have to find facts that support that (after Booker/Apprendi and the huge revision in the use of sentencing guidelines mandated by those cases).

If Nick were actually trying to make a case justifying deviating upwards from sentencing guidelines, he would be the world champ of it.
No upward deviation is necessary as the the "presumptive stayed" from the grid comes with a massive caveat.

guideline.png

Edit: from here:
guideline3.png
 
Last edited:
Watching Nick flip flop between different mutually exclusive copes is just amazing. This nigga is drowning under his own bullshit. You love to see it.
It's absolutely hilarious to see this brain-damaged tard flip flop between one lie and a completely contradictory lie, and somehow both lies make him look even worse, even though the actual truth is mind bogglingly horrifying. Even his lies are worse than the truth.

What a loser. What a faggot.
 
Back