US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
All good, buddy.

While it is far from the biggest spender (the US Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Realtors, and Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America are consistently the top 3), AIPAC is definitely the most notorious. I've looked into AIPAC and, despite all the conspiracy theories, it is pretty open and transparent as far as lobbying groups go. Their biggest scandal was arguably David Steiner bragging on tape about all the influence he had, which was released by another Jew who thought Steiner was a fucking prick.
Frankly, any rational person should despise those other three you listed far more than the fucking Heeb lobby. And contrary to what dumb wignat untermensch like to say, it's actually those first two (CoC and NAR) plus the agricultural lobby that are primarily responsible for the influx of barbarian third worlders into the country rather than the AIPAC.
I try to make this case to some people, but I always get called a glowie, a kike, or some form of nigger. It is actually quite interesting how the biggest lobbying groups go completely ignored (they are mostly healthcare and big pharmaceutical lobbies) but the Internet obsesses over da j0000z.
This argument is either dumb or in bad faith.
  • Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
  • National Association of Realtors
  • US Chamber of Commerce
What those have in common?:
They at least defend US interests, the US economy and US Jobs, or at least claim to be.
AIPAC is foreign lobby, something that would probably fall under FARA and be banned or have been under intense scrutiny by the US state department.
It's no different than the mid 1920s China lobby or the German Bund or the British efforts to drag america into ww1 and later ww2
Comparing a pharmaceutical lobby to one that aided and abetted ilegal spy operations on US soil is really something:
On 4 August 2005, U.S. Department of Defense official Lawrence Franklin and former American–Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC) staffers Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman were indicted on one or several of the following counts: conspiracy to communicate national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it; communication of national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it; and conspiracy to communicate classified information to agents of a foreign government, publicly identified as Israel. Franklin pleaded guilty and cooperated with the authorities, and was subsequently sentenced to a 12-year prison term. As of this writing, Rosen’s and Weissman’s trial was scheduled to start in August 2006
 
Im watching this speech and its arguably her best yet because in front of DC shills and a friendlier audience. I fail to see the appeal in the swing states.
This is the speech she should have been giving in Michigan and Pennsylvania instead of. . . whatever the fuck we've been getting out of her.
 
As reassuring as all of @Diana Moon Glampers's whitepills are, Why do I still have this sinking feeling that somehow she'll still win? I keep reading something about a Puerto Rico joke, AND that Illegals are being brought in to cast votes (most likely for Harris) in swing states and no one is doing anything about it, and thus the seed of doubt that Trump will win is planted inside. I want Trump to win because if he doesn't, We'll lose all of our freedoms and America as a result will be no more. I need just a bit more reassurance (and @Fatpacks, Don't say anything. Just shut the fuck up).
Let’s not pretend any of you fucking niggers, kikes, wops, and greasers are going to do anything about it if Kamala steals the election. And I’m not going to do anything either, because we all know that nothing ever happens and we’re all terminally online losers.
 
This argument is either dumb or in bad faith.
  • Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America
  • National Association of Realtors
  • US Chamber of Commerce
What those have in common?:
They at least defend US interests, the US economy and US Jobs, or at least claim to be.
AIPAC is foreign lobby, something that would probably fall under FARA and be banned or have been under intense scrutiny by the US state department.
It's no different than the mid 1920s China lobby or the German Bund or the British efforts to drag america into ww1 and later ww2
Comparing a pharmaceutical lobby to one that aided and abetted ilegal spy operations on US soil is really something:
https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/espionIsraelEU.pdf
The Chamber of Commerce is a demon the Jews wish they could be. I know you're Brazillian so you don't get that, but understand, nah nigger, the Chamber of Commerce is actually satan.
 
This is the speech she should have been giving in Michigan and Pennsylvania instead of. . . whatever the fuck we've been getting out of her.
It genuinely looks like this one is the most diverse, rehearsed yet, but it's the last major one.

And yet, she still pushed Trump, Trump, Trump, Project 2025, I grew up, I will do things when I'm in power and I didn't before because... reasons.

If only she had this eloquence in all of her speeches, combine that with a better campaigning team, and maybe she would be an actual challenge.
 
"I will always tell the truth"
Like you told the truth about Biden's mental state?

View attachment 6576061
- Claimed Project 2025 was written by his closest advisors, this is false.
- Claimed Donald Trump tried to cut Social Security and Medicare, this is false.
- Claimed Donald Trump would end "Head Start", this is false.
- She repeatedly, perhaps even in this speech too, claims she would end "price gouging" but has no policy and no information about this on her platform of how she is going to achieve this.
- She has multiple policies which are throwing the money at something like house building but has 0 information about how she will fund this.
- She has multiple times twisted the words of Donald Trump or outright lied. He has never said there were fine people on both sides, he did not encourage violence and promoted peace on January 6th, he has never claimed he would use the military to attack his political opponents, he has never been proven to say anything positive about Hitler or the Nazis.
- Claimed he only cut taxes on the upper class "billionare friends" of his. Nope, he cut taxes across the board. Ironically she and the democrats will remove these tax cuts which will effect working and middle class people the most.
- She has attacked Trump tariffs and tax cuts that her own administration were happy to keep and are now claiming are terrible.
- Constant lies that Trump "banned abortion" or is "going to ban abortion"
- Outright lies about the Border Bill that had so much attached to it including giving citizenship to millions of illegals and 100s of millions to Ukraine. It was also a complete failure of a weak bill that even democrats didn't want.
- Deceptively removes the context of Trump talking about NATO allies, he wanted them to pay their fair share of the contribution to Defense rather than the US and UK being the sole countries paying 2%. Ironically he was completely correct because as soon as Russia invaded Ukraine a bunch of countries started paying a lot more on defense. It wouldn't have been a problem if they listened to him back in 2017.
 
"It is time to stop pointing fingers" says the woman whose campaign calls Trump "Literally Hitler", and runs her entire platform as being "not Trump".
View attachment 6576044
I swear, it's almost like her campaign is just trolling everyone, effectively saying, "Yeah, I know I'm preaching against that which I am literally doing. Do something about it, bish!"
 
I currently have people actually trying to tell me that there are millions of women who typically vote republican that will be voting for Harris this election. That worked really well for Killary. The cope has reached astronomical levels.
Sadly this shit is working on people even in this very thread getting them to doom and gloom about Trumps literal historic numbers in every single metric that will likely not be seen again for a long time by someone running as a republican.

Like the early voting numbers posted awhile back here and attempts to spin the gaps as negative... the early voting gaps are historic to the extreme for a republican candidate in a positive way but people are easily fooled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back