Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.5%

  • Total voters
    356
View attachment 6576801

There are only 2 types of faggots I've ever seen use this response. The first are atheists and leftists who think they are getting some epic own by using your religion against you. The second are fake Christians whose only understanding of the faith is believing they can do anything they want and no one can say anything because Jesus said to first take the plank out of your own eye. They conveniently ignore every other thing the bible says.
Exactly. Worded this way, Christian becomes an 'other' category that the speaker does not consider himself to be a part of.

An actual Christian may say, "How righteous of you," sarcastically. Nick implies he is not a Christian here.
 
l'm not a Bible scholar but I'm certain this means Christians should judge those within the same church when it comes to immoral behaviour. Church can also be interpreted as those of the same faith, considering how loose people go on with scriptures nowadays. The verses were referring to a couple who weren't married but sleeping together.
Now, what should a Christian do with TWO COUPLES, four of them, that were sleeping in the same bed, with 5 children not being fed and clothed, and the second youngest one testing positive for cocaine metabolites?
Don't judge right because that's so not Christian, right?
Fuck off skelly.
You're in luck as I kind of am.

Now, yes a Christian is not supposed to judge non-believers and people that are of different religions. As they are ignorant, the nature of man can not understand God (at least a deeper understanding) and His will. When man fell he left them to a reprobate mind. It takes the influence of The Holy Spirit to draw man unto God.
Essentially to go about "judging" a Christian as a fellow Christian is to confront them about their sins, if they are not repentant you do it again with 2 witnesses. If they continue in sin you bring them in front of Church elders. Which I believe all of these steps were tried with Nick. He wrote them all off as prudes and now nerds. If they are still unrepentant you cast them out. As far as other religions and non-believers, you're supposed to spread the Gospel, not in a condemning way, but to speak to them in a loving manner. You're supposed to plant the seed. A third will fall into fertile soil and grow, a third will fall into the weeds and be choked out, and a third will fall on to rocky soil and will not grow. That was a parable that Jesus told.

Nick has been totally unrepentant. When members of his church confronted him, he made fun of them and wrote their concerns off. When confronted by the pastor (an elder of the church) he was still belligerently unrepentive. All three steps laid out in Matthew to the early church, were followed.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that Nick is more than likely unsaved yet masqueraded as a Christian. That's more dangerous than any atheist or other faith to a Christian because they lead others astray. Christians feel convicted when living in sin, I see no conviction from Nick.

Edit: Matthew not Paul, but Paul did write how to deal with sinners and fake Christians in his letters.
 
Last edited:
It looks like April and Nick found a way to relieve their stress after such a trying couple of days.

In the past hour or so, April followed the Instagram account @bebopbountybigband, a band that literally only performs music from Cowboy Bebop, and performed a sold-out audiovisual show in Minneapolis tonight at the Varsity Theater.

View attachment 6576713
View attachment 6576716

Going to an anime concert? What a funny, weird, and above all NERDY thing to do! Look at all these NERDS!

View attachment 6576720

Hope they get back to Spicer in time to get enough sleep. Nick has to be well rested in order to drive around his kids that he totally has custody of.
I've seen them, it's a pretty entertaining show. If you're not familiar with Cowboy Bebop, it's an anime that has very highly regarded music, even among people who don't like anime. That said, the band plays the music accompanied by the anime footage and the vocalists they use (particularly the female) really don't compare to the real deal, so unless you've seen the show and have a lot of attachment to specific scenes from specific episodes, this probably won't do anything for you.

So the point is...did they like it? If so, they're nerds. If not, well, still probably nerds but nerds with bad taste.
 
My point is I think it's STMS haters. Dabbleverse retards. Melton fans. A rose by any other name.

Based on what @Doof posted, it could very well be this Ian Hawk guy.

What I'm wondering is whether it's done to benefit Nick, or whether they're just being their usual retarded selves.

Trust me, it's the latter
 
While the meaning of "Nick & April" is obvious, the "feat. Molly in Paradise" part is more unclear. I'm going to speculate that the "feat. Molly" refers to the drug MDMA, though.

Get the feeling that April and Nick are really stepping up the effort now in trying to upgrade her to Number 1 ho, but have been facing frustrations from whatever quarter. I wonder if Kayla being late to her hearing was deliberate sabotage on Nick's part, or just shows the level of disregard he has for her, considering he was still posting in Melton's chat continuously like half an hour before.
 
Is there a way to prove that it was Melton fans, Dabbleverse people? Surely everyone here knows the #1 rule. I know people in this thread want to see what happens to them, and hope for the book to be thrown at them. We all know the cope that'll be pulled, that " Kiwis were the problem, all they want to do is to A-log poor Nick"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Lmao it was. I wouldn’t have my side piece do her court appearances where her case hinges on her not living there in the house. What are they thinking?

“Oh you think that’s MY house nerd? Well it’s blurred again so you’ll never be able to… wait am I on screen?” 🥃:really:
Another classic Nick "Wait is my camera on?" moment
 
Nick, we know you have a mobile setup since you've used it in the living room. How brainholed are you that you think it's fine for your side piece to stream from your fucking studio? Just set it up in a different room. You really are a dumb motherfucker.

He has still not arsed himself to get proficient at streaming in over 5 years. He has bought a lot of expensive equipment that he can barely run. For the 7 figure money he was pulling in, this is inexcuseable.

This critique really applies to a lot of streamers (looking at @Potentially Criminal , Jew Logic, and Uncivil Law) who never manage to get the lighting and the sound correct or figure out video and audio settings. Emily Baker has this sorted, and though I do not watch her, she has the correct attitude of treating it as a business. Get help if you need it.

I remember during Rittenhouse that Rekieta said he was planning on splitting the money after Joe went on one of many jewish "GIVE ME MONEY" tirades in the middle of one rekieta's rittenhouse streams to the audience.

I remember a Super Chat asking how people got paid, and Nick explained that not on did on his channel, but he would be putting together 'something' as a 'thank-you'.

In Nick's latest conspiracy theory, "someone" gathered up out of "context" quotes of Nick talking about religious matters and passed them on to the pastor of his church. This apparently was part of poisoning the pastor's mind against his former good friend Nick leading to the report on Nick as a bad parent to the authorities and presumably also led indirectly to the search warrant being issued against him.

So perhaps during the trial or during the appeal we will be hearing more about Nick's religious views perhaps either in the context of calling the pastor to the stand or maybe from Nick himself if he takes the stand to set the record straight.

Nick also came in that same stream as close as he has ever come to admitting he denied the divinity of christ. But he explained that he was just being "cheeky" and speaking in the spirit of literary analysis when he said it. Nick now says that Nick has no expertise on religious matters.

This was the most hilarious part of the DM chain. 'My pastor only turned me in for starting my kids because of my heresy! He is so mediocre!' Total lack of self-awareness.

I'd settle for more of Nick's faux-Nietzsche or faux Ayn-Rand tweets. Go full Satanist or full pseudo-intellectual, Nick!

You know you're smarter than all of us nerds.

He doesn't have the brain cells to to extemporaneous toasts. You think he could sound psuedo-deep philosophical?

Forgive me for being a faggot, but what is a custodial sentence? I looked up the definition, but would it be he's put in jail? Or house arrest? That's where I'm confused.

A sentence you serve in 'custody' of the state--as opposed to house arrest, fines, probation, or community service.

Skelly is a two-faced liar, this has been clear since page 1500.
Also, I'm pretty sure the Bible says Christians shouldn't judge people of other faiths, but calling out the sinful activities of fellow Christians isn't just fine, it's encouraged.
Now, yes a Christian is not supposed to judge non-believers and people that are of different religions. As they are ignorant, the nature of man can not understand God (at least a deeper understanding) and His will. When man fell he left them to a reprobate mind.
You are supposed to try to patiently convince non-believers they are wrong, but there is a moral imperative to correct fellow believers. It is expected that non-believers do not follow the rules, but other Christians should know better.

Most children understand the fairness in that if you know the rules, breaking them is something you will get in more trouble for doing.

The reprobate mind is what is left when people totally reject God, per Romans 1: 28 and 32.

So is Quover pronounced "que - over" or "cover" ? And what does it even mean? That shit is mad retarded i agree with April.
like Quo-ver Like the quo in status quo and the ver in over.
I'm also dumb and could be saying it wrong. It feels right though.

Rhymes with 'cover'--per my recollection of Aaron's telling.
 
This talk of Nick's repentance (or lack thereof) gives me an excuse to enjoy the excommunication scene from Becket. For those who have not yet appreciated the dulcet tones of Mr. Richard Burton, you may do so now:

:really: : You scandinavian incel christian prudes are so dramatic, is a miscegenation vacation or three really excommunication worthy? that's it, I'm starting my own church with hookers and blow.
 
You are supposed to try to patiently convince non-believers they are wrong, but there is a moral imperative to correct fellow believers. It is expected that non-believers do not follow the rules, but other Christians should know better.

The reprobate mind is what is left when people totally reject God, per Romans 1: 28 and 32.
When I said ignorant, it wasn't in the negative connotation, merely "those who don't know." I should have clarified.

Thanks for the specific verses, as I'm writing it off of memory.
 
Back