Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We need to give jannies more work to compensate with how much we're paying themCan we please stop spilling Russia-Ukraine discussion all over for Useful_Mistake to clean up?
C'mon, dude. We have good jannies. The greatest jannies. The most beautiful jannies. They sweep up better than any jannies anywhere else. We have the best jannies, don't we, folks?We need to give jannies more work to compensate with how much we're paying them
I don’t know that the gender breakdown is all that important when you have the R/D breakdown. If women favor Kamala as a whole, but more Republican Women actually show up to vote, that’s likely to result in a Trump win.While women do favor Cumula not all women. Women are some of the biggest anti abortion activists afterall.
The other dimension is that women are the biggest consumers and are missing out on money they used to consume stupid shit and feeling the pinch of that. Women are the ones i hear complaining shit is so expensive now the most irl. Also some women fucking HATE Kamala. And women are more than happy to hate on another woman.
In short 10 percent higher women doesnt translate to 100 percent of that going to Kamala.
Women also vote higher because they are more likely to have a job that lets them vote or just have less going on in general to spend an hour out of a day to do this.
Fuck yeah.
You giving them a permanent one or just a timeout? I guess anything more than a week might as be one anyways.Yeah, I've threadbanned him
Voter turnout matters: Dems go after high-propensity voters while Trump courts those who rarely or never show up to the ballot box
As the finish line for the 2024 presidential election nears, Democrats have been receiving the support of high-propensity voters who cast ballots in midterms or primaries, while Trump has been courting the vote of low-propensity voters like young men and nonwhite voters.
According to the New York Times, their latest poll of swing states in conjunction with Siena College found that Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris led among voters who cast ballots in the 2022 midterms and the 2024 primaries. GOP candidate Donald Trump holds a 12-point lead among those who last voted during the 2020 presidential election and a 19-point lead among those adults with no voting record. Harris and Trump are tied among those who last voted in 2022.
The outlet noted that Democrats benefited during the Obama era from "mobilizing young, nonwhite and infrequent voters to the polls." These "familiar maxims have been turned upside down."
"In the extreme, the Times/Siena data suggests Mr. Trump could win the presidency, perhaps even fairly handily, if he could turn out all registered voters," the outlet stated, noting the example of Times/Siena polling never showing Harris or Biden leading in the state of Michigan among registered voters in the 2024 cycle. "If, on the other hand, Ms. Harris could replay the midterm electorate, when more casual voters stayed home, she could easily win over 300 electoral votes and carry the swing states by a comfortable margin."
While Harris receives more support overall among black voters, Trump nearly doubled his support from the group between those who voted in 2022 to those who didn’t vote then. Trump sees a similar bump in support among Hispanic, white voters with college degrees, and white voters with no college degrees between those who voted in 2022 and those who did not.
Trump trails Harris by one point among those in swing states who say they are "almost certain" they will vote, and leads by four points among those who say they are "very likely." He also saw a one-point lead among those who say they are "somewhat likely."
The outlet noted that low-turnout voters can be unpredictable in their voting, as many are still undecided, and "if these voters break one way or another as they tune in to the race, it’s easy to imagine how either side wins comfortably."
Stuff like that should be reported to the police. Good God.
If it's a test why not use obviously fake numbers 123,456,789 or 99,999,999 voters or results like jill winning 65%. This happened back during the bernie/biden primary too, aired data a day before the election and claimed it was a test. They air shit like this then act like viewers are retarded for worrying. Learn to make the fictional data more obviously fictional for your "tests".
This is how the made up scenario in their head would go in real life:
This is how the made up scenario in their head would go in real life:
I see a lot of YouTube links get posted here that I can't watch because they are age-restricted and I don't have an account. Is there a way to get around this that I'm not aware of?This is how the made up scenario in their head would go in real life:
I'm sure you just didn't know, it's not like you appear to be running cover or anything.The biggest manufacturer of OxyContin was Purdue Pharma
Bet 9/10 of these retards were not using a dedicated account for their "activism". Can't collect ass pats on an anon account.I know we just had a whole thing about X posts, but I feel like this is important. I am working on scraping the directory tree now and I'll wrap it up in a tarball and post it, probably here. It'll be interesting to see what was going on.
View attachment 6578525
(URL)/(Archive)