Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
This case will never end.
This case does not end.
There is no end to this case.
This case will never end.
This is the case that never ends.
Yes it goes on and on, my friends.
Rusty started suing not knowing what it was
And he'll keep on suing Josh forever just because:

This is the case that never ends.
Yes it goes on and on, my friends.
Rusty started suing not knowing what it was
And he'll keep on suing Josh forever just because....
 
Where my filings at?
Good timing
Screenshot 2024-11-01 204609.png
Shocker:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 204650.png
 

Attachments

View attachment 6587792

lmao good luck with that
Point three seems impossible, and point two would take literally years as Null would have to read through 408 pages on this thread and 4450 pages on the other. Point one is difficult because those copyrights (at issue) are not on the site (google link isn't, and the song is long since deleted)
 
Point three seems impossible, and point two would take literally years as Null would have to read through 408 pages on this thread and 4450 pages on the other. Point one is difficult because those copyrights (at issue) are not on the site (google link isn't, and the song is long since deleted)
Point 1 would require Null to track how many times a link on the site is clicked (which I highly doubt he does) and to have retained that information for several years.

If only Google were in the case, so they could provide this information. What a shame.
 
Point three seems impossible, and point two would take literally years as Null would have to read through 408 pages on this thread and 4450 pages on the other. Point one is difficult because those copyrights (at issue) are not on the site (google link isn't, and the song is long since deleted)
I don't think point 3 is possible without system/application/network logs going back years. The only scenario is if the logs still exist (doubtfully) and Russ hires a computer forensics expert to sift through gargantuans amount of data. That's about a 0% chance.

On point 2... Isn't that something Russ could do without discovery?

And best case scenario for 3 is how many times user clicked a link to the Google Drive, but that doesn't mean they did anything other than click the link. Similar issue as 3rd point too IMO, in that you'd have to pour over years of logs and identify specific syntax. Russ is expecting Null to provide computer forensics expertise for free, lol.
 
LOL Russ thinks they can do all the discovery in 45 days from today and wants to limit discovery to 1 deposition, 1 interrogatory, 1 request for production, and 1 request for admissions. That doesn't mean one set, it means one question.

Everything he proposed is nonsense, even if he served all his written discovery today Josh wouldn't have the time the rule allows for reply. Let alone any time to object or litigate that. What a retarded asshole.

Have Hardin bombard this dumb nigger with RFA's he'll fuck them up and default.
 
This is just the same thing he filed last time. What a retard. That timeline is impossible.
The thing he already did (upon threat of dismissal), plus complaints that Hardin didn't do the rest of the work for him. Russ stays true to form.

I'm looking forward to Hardin's filing with an exhibit of whiny Greer emails attached.
 
I'm looking forward to Hardin's filing with an exhibit of whiny Greer emails attached.
Ask, and ye shall receive.
Screenshot 2024-11-01 231115.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000001.png
image-000002.png

More fraud from Russ:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 231544.png
 

Attachments

He did move his proposed trial date back but changed fuck else. Why would he want to though when he doesn't plan on doing any work since he himself admittedley has no evidence of anything?

Hope Hardin files some of the dialog with Greer on this. I'm sure the judge will just set a schedule even though the plaintiff again refuses to do anything to further the case. Posted as I was typing!

So basically Greer did just fold his arms and ask Hardin to come up with a schedule. He only changed the trial date in the version he just filed with the court and kept the January trial date in the one that he sent to Hardin.
 
Last edited:
Yah honah, I'm just a fuckin retard yah honah. I didn't know I was supposed to do it that way, I promise yah honah.
It's okay my little retard boy, defendants are hereby charged with contempt of court and Joshua Moon must play footsie with Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED
 
Is the defense required to file a proposed schedule today as well?
 
Back