Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Meat Target]

What's baffling to me is there are still people who believe his constant lies and confabulations even after he's been exposed.

Denial is the first stage of grief. People hate admitting they've been taken for a ride by a persuasive liar.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

As a fitness nerd, this horrifies me.

So, nobody in the house knows how to make whole foods? How worthless is Kayla? How can someone be a mother for 15 years and don't know how to cook? Nobody knows how to make a quality steak? Nobody knows how to do quality protein? Does the diet of the kids consists of just empty carbs coming from cake and junk food (such as spaghetti-os)? If so, It's no surprise that some of the kids, and parents, might suffer from emotional issues. This kind of garbage diet is poison for you brain and body.

Stress alone does not explain the collagen depraved ghoul that Rekieta has become. I am 100% sure that, even if he is really sober, his diet is probably full of processed slop. The possibility of the kids having the same garbage diet breaks my heart. This is fucked.
Edit: grammar

Nick did cooking streams, so he at least knows how to cook for himself. I'm not sure if he was the one doing most of the cooking, but it would not surprise me if they lived off frozen food and TV dinners for the past 15 years.

This may partly explain the 3k USD snack budget, as horrifying as it may be... They may be subsisting off quick and easy 'instant-food' now. People (CPS) are paying attention, so I hope they catch this before it becomes an issue.

I doubt this was happening the whole time. They had a nanny, and Nick did show himself cooking some basic food and using a grill. There was also the fact that the kids were spending a lot of time previously with their cousins, so that is another avenue for food. I also believe it would have been reported much earlier.

A few selected arguments
- Kids are hungry all the time. You can draw any conclusions about a kid saying they are hungry.
- Kids today are weird. Often they wear dirty clothes or the same clothes day after day by their own choice.
- Just because you are wearing the same clothes don't mean you didn't change them. Many people have whole closets full of the same clothing.
- Just because you are wearing dirty clothes doesn't mean you didn't shower.
- What Nick's kid's suffered wasn't "real" neglect about abuse. Fat internet guy knows about real abuse and it would scare us if he saw it.
- "I dont think Nick is this addict like people think he is. My main case is that he is just snorting it". Real cocaine junkies (not Nick) according to him either smoke crack or inject cocaine. Nobody can have a coke problem if they only snort it.
- Nick's cokestream was understandable. Anyone who suffered a defeat like Nick did against Monty in the appeals court would have needed something that night.
- Drug's can keep you from reaching your best potential as a parent, but they don't lower you to your worst potential as a parent. Drug use is unrelated to parental ability.

This is just a superset of things that Nick, Joe, and 'I-turned-out-fine-so-how-bad-could-it-be?' arguments.

Tolkien was correct when he said the worst job of any man, even saints, is to boss others around, because not one in a million is fit for it. But even if it's a dirty job, someone has to do it.

One of the functions of government is to prevent people from violating the rights and wellbeing of other people. Some will do whatever they want, no matter how much it harms others, until they are stopped by force.

The enforcers are never going to be perfect, but it's better than just throwing our hands up and having total chaos. America in particular is a long-running experiment of how to balance individual rights and the common good.

I whole-heartedly subscribe to this opinion and cite Tolkien on it frequently. I am a huge advocate for self-responsibility and for people to be empowered to be independent, introspective, and self-sustaining. On a religious level, the argument can be made that the highest sin is imposition of personal will over another.

Spoiler: Minor PL

I used to be a state employee, and I changed career field entirely because of the real ethical concerns I began to develop regarding how the power was wielded.

 

[Pure Soap]

What's he going to rebrand as? His smut channel for wine mums wasn't a super success and he has no skills or interests which could sustain an audience. Anything Nick chose as the focus of a channel, someone else is already doing and doing better than Nick ever could.

Isn’t it obvious? He’ll rebrand into a sex toy review channel for men with ED…he already has experience in that field.

 

[kidatari]

Rekieta can no longer be a lawyer
see what you guys did
Apologize!

 

[Captain Manning]

I think the whole Mandy thing should’ve been it because that blew him up as lolcow of the year.

That was a big deal here, but I don't think that made a gigantic impact off-site.

The fucking arrest, and the test results on his daughter, resonated much stronger and further.

Put another way, I'm talking about what justified putting...

End-stage career failure: normies know.​

...in the title of this thread. Which, IIRC, wasn't there until after the arrest.

I'm talking about what got people like that K lady, or Ana Kasparian interested.

We all found the MANdy shit funny. But that was NOTHING compared to what kicked off in May.

 

[Major]

Anyway. Nick released the Aaron sex videos to absolutely own him! It would be soooo embarrassing to put up a video of him fucking your wife (or better let you fucking April and giving her an orgasm (something Aaron has never done)

He did? Where?

 

[Sharpeteer]

Rekieta can no longer be a lawyer
see what you guys did
Apologize!

No

 

[not william stenchever]

Because the next easiest RC to find is Ketamine analogues.

K-Hole Kayla would like to know more.

 

[Desktop User2]

Those who've never seen photos of the house should take a look at how gaudy it is and keep in mind that Celeste and Bob probably paid a lot of money to have it decorated in such a tacky fashion.

https://www.redfin.com/FL/Saint-Petersburg/1160-80th-Street-Ct-S-33707/home/48125850

Holy shit, they have nordic (or Ikea), patina, art deco and whatever the fuck is that kitchen. Were his parents on drugs while doing that decor as well. That wooden floor to patio style tiling transition is daunting.

 

[anionfarflung]

Asking because I don't know: since his license has lapsed, does that make him immune to discipline until he chooses to re-up?

Never become a fanboy of any online personality.

Yeah not a fanboy. A fan is fine, as long as you don't try to establish some parasocial relationship.

he’s definitely trolling and that’s really funny.

I'm sure it's probably one of us, and that's not a hint that it's me.

 

[Meat Target]

I think the whole Mandy thing should’ve been it because that blew him up as lolcow of the year.

That was a big deal here, but I don't think that made a gigantic impact off-site.

To use an autistic baseball analogy: MANdy was like the Yankees picking up Derek Jeter, and what followed was like their late 90's World Series dynasty.

Before MANdy, there were other cows in contention for LOTY, like BMJ and Fatrick. After that is when Nick ran away with the title.

 

[Desktop User2]

To use an autistic baseball analogy: MANdy was like the Yankees picking up Derek Jeter, and what followed was like their late 90's World Series dynasty.

Before MANdy, there were other cows in contention for LOTY, like BMJ and Fatrick. After that is when Nick ran away with the title.

the LOTY from last year was pushed by jilted ex-fans and Jersh finally turning, he was fucking up but nowhere near some of the horrorcows like Larsen. The fall from grace this year tho, from 7 figures to no streams, no family, public scorn from every corner of the Internet... never again there will be anything remotely close to Rackets´ downfall, maybe Andy Dick with less cocks sucked (probably).

 

[ChromaQuack]

I can have 1000 Nitrazolam bars delivered by Monday if i so chose to. Does he seemed Benzo’d out or just disassociated? Because the next easiest RC to find is Ketamine analogues.

Considering Nicky extensively and obsessively reads his thread I think we all know which drug he's doing next, he's got to be furiously googling 'the ali express of drugs' right about now.

 

[Meat Target]

never again there will be anything remotely close to Rackets´ downfall, maybe Andy Dick with less cocks sucked (probably).

Or the sorta pre-KF case of Anthony Cumia. Spent three decades on top of the comedy and satellite radio world, and now spends his sixties yelling "nigger" at kids on Cawadooty.

The major difference being that unlike us with Nick, our cousins over on OnA Forums never actually looked up to Ant as a role model, because he was always forthright about being a bastard who happened to be funny.

 

[Captain Manning]

the LOTY from last year was pushed by jilted ex-fans and Jersh finally turning, he was fucking up but nowhere near some of the horrorcows like Larsen. The fall from grace this year tho, from 7 figures to no streams, no family, public scorn from every corner of the Internet... never again there will be anything remotely close to Rackets´ downfall, maybe Andy Dick with less cocks sucked (probably).

Last year, there were quite a few people (somewhat understandably) oblivious to how Rekieta could have won LotY. They thought it was just MANdy. @Balldo's Gate got accused of being a CIA glownigger. It was kinda funny. I think this thread was featured only twice that year. One for the initial defeat in the Monty case in front of Fischer, and then at the very end of the year concerning MANdy.

This year, I have a hunch things are gonna be different. Though the BMJ people might still be salty.

 

[WayTooSleepy]

Nick was in steep decline long before his arrest and the extent of his drug abuse becoming public.

His success was built on offering content which was unique at the time. He stopped offering that content, many other lawyers are now providing it, and people have come to realise that Nick isn't at all well versed in the law (many realised that when he was proven so very wrong in Vic's case).

What's he going to rebrand as? His smut channel for wine mums wasn't a super success and he has no skills or interests which could sustain an audience. Anything Nick chose as the focus of a channel, someone else is already doing and doing better than Nick ever could.

Whaddya mean!? He's Nick Rekieta, the rock and roll lawyer, and he does cocaaaaaaaine. He's also definitely not a NERD like those non-coked out lawyers.

 

[ChromaQuack]

Though the BMJ people might still be salty.

Why tough? Bossman losing it all at the last second is what makes him so entertaining.

: "DUDE I LOST LOLCOW OF THE YEAR AGAIN FUCK MY LIFE MAN"

 

[AncientPhosphur]

He did? Where?

Auto correct pushed it to past tense

He did not but he should

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

I grew up with a lot of Slavic, Romanian, and Polish community where cooking for the family is a core value and skill. Look at Poland, Hungary, and Romania's government that are subsidising mortgages, banning work in cafes on weekends, and doing everything they can to up their birth rates.

Lady, this is America we're talking about, we make machinists pay their own tooling, unlimited mandatory overtime in professions, legal sub-minimum wage jobs, jobs without lunch or break time, and get taxed on our illegal income. Do you really [edit:] think the American government gives a shit about birthrates when they can just import the rest of the world (answer is no).

That being said, Crackieta and his wife have never had to deal with those situations in life but are still giant failures in the "being a responsible adult category". This is despite their retarded asses having shop and home ec classes while having literally money printer parents. Somehow my broke-ass (and a lot of other Americans) which had neither of these ended up being a more competent person in life (except being a voluntary member of Kiwifarms)...

If I had Nick's money I'd create a doomsday cult educational campaign based around Heemeyer, natural rights, Uncle Ted, St. Davis and how to run over glowing niggers at night instead of blowing it on crack and swinging.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

No, he's not disbarred, but I subscribe to @AnOminous's definition that if you aren't licensed anywhere, you don't get to call yourself a lawyer.

In my view, Nick is no longer a lawyer.

In my view he was never much of one.

But I was really trying to quell the spin-up or false lore creation.

He could literally be back in good standing by Monday if fees are the only concern.

The number of lawyers who have missed a fee due date and technically become "not authorized" is a number I couldn't even guess. It has no real impact if it's a short period of time and they're not practicing, not actively representing clients nor trying to get them (e.g., if someone in a business role with a company, not counsel to the company, misses a fee deadline they can still do their job...so long as they don't hold themselves out as a lawyer while doing it. Similar for someone who has stepped out of the workforce/practice and doesn't hold themselves out as an attorney). It's not good, and it is or should be embarrassing and corrected immediately, but it can be.

I'm speaking in generalities. Nick has consistently held himself out as a lawyer in every area of life - formally as late as May/June (or maybe later - idr if he brought up bitching about seeing "his clients" pre-arraignment at a later point), so he should be careful what he says. Likely worst case for a single slip-up would result in a letter from the Bar, but that's the potential beginning of a big problem.

In fact, in at least some jurisdictions he is expressly forbidden from holding himself out as one anymore.

yep

It does apply to crimes of "moral turpitude" even when they don't directly harm clients. Cop a felony fraud prosecution and that actually does reflect on one's fitness to practice law. It's happened for tax evasion as well. Engaging in prostitution one way or the other might also qualify, even if it doesn't even really reflect on fitness to practice law. Minnesota is probably not one of the incel prude states that consider it such, though.

Yes, this or the other thread has had this discussion before, and I am pretty sure I posted stuff about the MN (and ABA) approach. MN does not use the moral turpitude terminology, but keeps it flexible. He's vulnerable, though recall there are a variety of potential actions between nothing and disbarment (including suspension (temp or perm), reprimand, pay costs, admin probation, retake the professional responsibility exam, or other appropriate disposition) (per MN Rules on Lawyers' Responsibility).

Misconduct:

Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct​

Rule 8.4Misconduct​

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

(a)​

violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b)​

commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;

(c)​

engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;

(d)​

engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;

(e)​

state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;

(f)​

knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law;

(g)​

harass a person on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, ethnicity, or marital status in connection with a lawyer's professional activities;

(h)​

commit a discriminatory act, prohibited by federal, state, or local statute or ordinance that reflects adversely on the lawyer's fitness as a lawyer. Whether a discriminatory act reflects adversely on a lawyer's fitness as a lawyer shall be determined after consideration of all the circumstances, including:
(1) the seriousness of the act;
(2) whether the lawyer knew that the act was prohibited by statute or ordinance;
(3) whether the act was part of a pattern of prohibited conduct; and
(4) whether the act was committed in connection with the lawyer's professional activities; or

(i)​

refuse to honor a final and binding fee arbitration award after agreeing to arbitrate a fee dispute.

Comment (1991) on (b):

Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to the practice of law. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, or breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation.