Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most of the swing states polls are within the margin of error, but Trump has a good chance to win most of them.If PA is called early, though, it's almost certain Trump wins.
This is a R+2 national environment. That's fucking not even close. Anyone telling anything this is a close election and / or Harris is doing great is lying to you. Full stop.I wonder what their internals look like, I honestly can't believe for a second that PA is a close race.
Kamala's also saying she wants no taxes on tips now. I know she's piggybacking off of Trump's proposal, but that might stifle some of the momentum he got from that.No tips on taxes is huge in Clark County. DO you know how much money people in the casinos comes from tips?
I was very little for 1984 but I remember it.For any folks that were alive when Reagan won in 1980 and 1984.
What was it like in the leadup to both landslides?
Thought I'd go back to this and look at Trump's strategy:I haven't seen this one but I think this is valuable info, and tells a lot about what's going on in the Harris campaign.
The only reason why she would cancel on Michigan to go on SNL (of all things) is because their internal polls most likely indicate Michigan is not worth touching, my best guess would be the RCP No-Toss-Ups map is closest to what they have.
The only reason why she would focus her last 3 rallies on Pennsylvania is if their internal polls indicate PA is a close enough swing state, which is key enough to win the election.
With such desperation, the only way she wins is by edging out the electoral vote.
My best guess is, they're going for this, the RCP NTU map with Pennsylvania flipped (Highlighted in dark blue here)
View attachment 6594678
https://xcancel.com/JackPosobiec/status/1853051319843512384 / https://archive.is/bBJQB
View attachment 6594685
Pennsylvania | North Carolina | Virginia | Georgia | Michigan | EVs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 287 |
Pennsylvania | North Carolina | Virginia | Georgia | Michigan | EVs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 271 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 271 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 270 |
Pennsylvania | North Carolina | Virginia | Georgia | Michigan | EVs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 280 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 283 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 280 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | 281 |
I mean, we could use a third party polling site, but only editing the top post with a new poll if that's even possible would be prominent enough to make it meaningful. That would have to be its own thread, which again, wouldn't have the same traction.I'm curious... is there any way we could determine what percentage of this thread has early voted? These early vote numbers are insane, but almost none of the the right-wing people I know personally have early voted. Something really isn't adding up, at least from what I've seen. Is it possible that the reduced democrat turnout and the increased republican turnout is actually... the same exact people who would normally be breaking left, breaking right? Could the right-wing early voters actually be mostly independents and previously left leaners registering as republicans and early voting as usual? If that were the case it'd be a total blowout come election day.
I’m probably wrong but if Trump wins I think it would be more likely that Harris sweeps the rust belt but Trump flips a state like NH or VA. Also I know the IA poll is an outlier but I believe such a thing could be possible. I have very little faith in polling at all. It seems like it’s just a very elaborate superstition. Oh you’re telling me you called voters on the phone and asked them who they were going to vote for? Great.Most of the swing states polls are within the margin of error, but Trump has a good chance to win most of them.
If he wins any one out of Pennsylvania, Michigan or Wisconsin, it's likely going to be enough.
This post needs to be the highlighted post tbh. Probably a Community Happenings 2.Without Pennsylvania, any combination
No, it's razor thin close and we need every vote, even if you're in a safe red or blue state.This is a R+2 national environment. That's fucking not even close. Anyone telling anything this is a close election and / or Harris is doing great is lying to you. Full stop.
Latino birth rates have been dropping quite a bit, especially per generation, though that's also partly because they're the group that views themselves as the most 'white' and marry whites at astounding rates. Which, to be fair, latinos are pretty fucking white on average, or even occasionally actually goddamn german. It's necessary to realize that the census data being used to determine whiteness in these studies is retarded, especially when it comes to latinos that are more white than most of Europe. Their issues aren't ethnicity related, but instead are due to globohomo, cartels, and the CIA bullying them into submission.
The biggest issue for demographics isn't latinos, but moreso retarded africans, incestuous muzzies, and slimey indians. If those gain any significant foothold on American politics, then we're doubly fucked.
Are the Amish known for voting in high numbers?Who advised Trump to have his Lancaster rally on Sunday? Obviously this won’t kill his campaign, but he’s missing on that Amish support.
I'm personally hoping Trump manages to flip a usually blue state because it would be funny.Most of the swing states polls are within the margin of error, but Trump has a good chance to win most of them.
If he wins any one out of Pennsylvania, Michigan or Wisconsin, it's likely going to be enough.
I am a white woman in a swing state and I early voted.I'm curious... is there any way we could determine what percentage of this thread has early voted? These early vote numbers are insane, but almost none of the the right-wing people I know personally have early voted. Something really isn't adding up, at least from what I've seen. Is it possible that the reduced democrat turnout and the increased republican turnout is actually... the same exact people who would normally be breaking left, breaking right? Could the right-wing early voters actually be mostly independents and previously left leaners registering as republicans and early voting as usual? If that were the case it'd be a total blowout come election day.
People keep saying this but I've never seen anyone actually say "I won't bother voting since Trump is leading."Anybody not voting because they believe Trump has such a great lead
People need to remember that the goal is not just to win, but to win, then keep winning, until you win so much that you get tired of winning, and then maybe win some more just to really rub it into the niggerfaggots' faces.Anybody not voting because they believe Trump has such a great lead is missing the point. The point is imagine a world where Trump wins the popular vote, nothing in our lives will compare to a lefty reaction to that, if this opportunity is missed I'll be left wondering my entire life of what could have been.
Shaming isn't the right word. It's vaguely threatening if you ask me.Grateful I only got aborted for 12hrsHe’s just mad I only have eyes for one chubby-faced blue-eyed shitposter please don’t ban me again I’m having fun.
I also got this in the mail yesterday, yeah it's public record and probably pretty standard but the shaming tactic is a bit annoying to me.
View attachment 6594973
That doesn’t make sense at all. The model predicts equal probability for the three scenarios, and the model was made when recent polls were more favorable to Harris. The last set of polls show a return back to Trump favorability with the exception of the moony Iowa poll.I'm honestly gonna say it, the top or middle scenarios are the most likely