Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Consider me skeptical on any sort of post-election house/senate surge if Trump does win. Why? Because the House and Senate will flop around, not actually support Trump like they did refused to after 2016 as well, only pass tax cuts and more money for Israel (I think Trump will be able to pull off cutting Ukraine funds when he wins), and then be surprised when they get rekt in the 2026 midterms.Except they won't.
In 2026 the Senate elections are FAR more favorable, possibly allowing them a super majority in the House and Senate
It seems Trump got into pretty good detail about his policy and goals from interviews and rallies, based on your summary. As for energy policy, him and Vance see most renewable sources of energy as inefficient and have a deep hatred of wind especially because they suck at making power, wind farms are a waste of land and are an eyesore, also they hurt the environment though making waste (fan blades are not easy to recycle and don't bio degrade) and they hurt wildlife like birds and apparently whales according to Trump. So they don't solve our energy needs, nor do they solve environmental ones, and are a huge scam of government funds. Trump wants to tap into America's oil reserves as a way to generate wealth and foster industry, but for power he and Vance want to invest into nuclear, as they see it as the most efficient and clean.What do you people think of this?, because for all the quite vague talk of him fixing the economy, very little is actually discussed when it comes to his policies.
In general, he's a card-carrying protectionist, that much is obvious, he's quite weary of the global trade system the west has established, and he believes it has weakened the domestic economy, he'll continue trying to wean off the awkward economic relationship between the US and China, two geopolitically opposed great powers that also happened to trade a lot with each other, he's not a fan of regulations in general, probably because of his past experience as a businessman who he perceived such things were just holding him back, he doesn't like income taxes too and if he had his way, he would cut it off altogether, and finally, he LOVES petroleum and would do a lot to bolster the national production to the point renewable/alternate sources of energy are less of a priority on his mind, I'm not sure why he has such a boner for oil, maybe wind and solar are just for soyboy faggots or something
My family and I are making steakWhat's everyone eating for election night? I'm gonna be eating Korean BBQ chicken, and washing it down with soju and Stella
Dane and Milwaukee counties' existing fucks up polling efforts in WI, even before they kicked the ballot stuffing there into high gear in 2018.Wisconsin is hard to poll
It's the gradual years-long shift from milquetoast pro-government/pro-union opinions to outright Marxist attitudes and methodology in the open coming to fruition. The difference being: Marxists always fight dirty, as a rule.Call me a libertarian but what happened to the marketplace of ideas? Shitlibs just want to censor everyone because their ideas are shit and don’t stand up to scrutiny and mockery. Isn’t suppressing opposite opinions literally fascism? Yet they accuse us of the things they literally do. It just proves you can propagandise weak-willed and low information people to the point their minds are owned. Shitlibs worship ‘experts’ because it’s the ultimate mix of being spoon-fed their opinions and feeling superior because of it.
Maybe, but even outside of the environmentalist standpoint, I think it would ultimately hurt the health of domestic energy production to just focus only one specific source, I don't see anything wrong with also having a diverse array of sources in the form of more renewables into the national energy pool.I think he is more of a fan of being energy independent and to not buy shit that you can easily manufacture at home. Once people's trust in Nuclear is good enough he'll probably go for that instead.
I think a lot of his ideas are too late at this point, you need industry to have tariffs be useful for example, but should probably still be done to at least get the ball rolling on them. I could see it turn into de facto austerity, but again, if no one bites the poison pill on these things, the USD will eventually just hyperinflate and/or some other imperial collapse occurs.What do you people think of this?, because for all the quite vague talk of him fixing the economy, very little is actually discussed when it comes to his policies.
I dont have twitter, can you search how many were for "Vote Harris"?Saw these trending
View attachment 6598852
Keep up this momentum we need to make sure we all vote this election I'm sick of these smug liberals thinking they can do whatever they want.Saw these trending
View attachment 6598852
I think it’s great that the sister of Buffalo Bill gets a chance to work! Go CNN!!
View attachment 6598844
Five Guys with all the toppings. Shake Shack is alright but way overpriced.Who has best fastfood burger? I'm thinking of going to shake shack. I think all kiwis need to have burgers tomorrow night.
Uranium is extremely common. We literally aren't allowed to even prospect for it because of ecofags, but there is an insane amount of it laying around everywhere. Fun part about nuclear power is it lets you get the energy to make refining these lower grade uanium deposits cost effective. It's yet another case of Peak X retardation which has no basis in scientific fact.I know there are advances being made in salt thorium reactors, but there simply is not enough uranium on Earth to keep us going on nuclear energy for more than maybe 50 years. I used to be extremely pro-nuclear energy until I found out how little material there is for it versus the amount we need.
Just because Trump wants to do away with wind farms in favor of older, more reliable energy sources doesn't mean that we won't have a diverse and robust energy grid. Growing up in SoCal I can tell you that being dependent on renewables isn't worth it when you have brownouts every summer and have to drive past miles of ugly wind farms on road trips (I don't mind roof solar panels though). Giving the West Coast a nuclear plant will be a massive improvement to their grid, especially when California wants to go full speed ahead with electric cars.Maybe, but even outside of the environmentalist standpoint, I think it would ultimately hurt the health of domestic energy production to just focus only one specific source, I don't see anything wrong with also having a diverse array of sources in the form of more renewables into the national energy pool.