Beloved pet squirrel Peanut seized by New York state after 7 years in home - There is no political solution. You are shooting your way out of this

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Beloved pet squirrel Peanut seized by New York state after 7 years in home​

Published Oct. 30, 2024, 10:06 p.m. ET by Shane Galvin
Link (Archive)
1730465440166.png
A rescued pet squirrel that sat atop a social media and charity empire has been seized by New York state — with its owner saying it’s slated to be euthanized, according to an Instagram post.

Peanut the Squirrel was taken from his Elmira, NY, home Wednesday by officials from the Department of Environmental Conservation, who served a warrant to Peanut’s guardians after receiving complaints of “unlawfully possessed” animals, according to the post.
1730465461333.png

“Well internet, you WON,” the caption from account Peanut_The_Squirrel12 reads. “You took one of the most amazing animals away from me because of your selfishness. To the group of people who called DEC, there’s a special place in hell for you.”

A DEC spokesperson confirmed to The Post that officers took away Peanut the Squirrel and a pet raccoon.

The squirrel’s owner, Mark Longo, claimed that he was in “shock” and “disbelief” that DEC was going to allegedly euthanize his pet and friend, according to the social media post.

The DEC said that the animals were seized in coordination with Chemung County Health department “due to the presence of a rabis vector species (raccoon) in the home.”

The state agency did not comment on whether the animals will be euthanized.

Longo took in Peanut seven years ago, when he was just a kit, after seeing its mother get hit by a car, according to social media accounts.

Peanut boasts 532,000 followers on Instagram, more than 423,000 followers on Facebook, and over 2 million views on TikTok.

1730465507734.png

Longo, a Connecticut native, moved to Elmira in 2023 to start an animal sanctuary named P’Nut’s Freedom Farm, a 501.C.3 approved nonprofit.


“Last year we moved to NY in hopes of starting a NONPROFIT animal rescue in PNUT’s Name. [P’Nuts Freedom Farm] will forever live in PNUT’s memory,” Longo wrote in the post announcing Peanut’s seizure.


“With over 350 rescues, we’ve relied heavily on PNUT and his internet family to father donations to help more animals. I don’t even know how will [sic] continue to fundraise for this nonprofit.”


P’Nut’s Freedom Farm is an organization made up of veterinarians and caregivers who are dedicated to rescuing animals from abusive or dire situations, according to the group’s website.


Following the announcement of Peanut’s capture, Longo posted several phone numbers for the Department of Environmental Conservation onto his feed – asking supporters to call in protest against the government’s actions.

There is also a petition to return Peanut to his rightful home.


This is not the first time the DEC is in public relations hot water over confiscating a beloved pet.

Earlier this year, the department confiscated a 750-pound alligator from a Hamburg, NY, home, which was outfitted with a massive room and pool for the reptile’s comfort.

“Albert” the alligator had lived in his home for 34 years and was raised from a hatchling by guardian Tony Cavallaro, who is now suing the department to regain custody of his longtime friend.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to bite, are we sure this woman was the snitch?
Yes, she's fat and vile and yes she DFE'ed after being caught, but so did that New Zealand guy in Melbourne a while back who was innocent.
I'd wait for the subpoenas to come out before anyone is incriminated by public opinion.
Moreover, if the person knew the fate of the animal, would they still have snitched? Yes, whoever did this is scum, but most just aren't aware of how these animals are handled.

For fuck's sake someone in this thread thinks an executive level department manager with an Irish surname has to sign off to behead 2 animals.
This is what I'm leaning towards. Who are most people gonna call when they see a retard online using a wild animal to attention whore? Even if this was her, perhaps she was a naive fucker and had no clue the state was going to kill the squirrel.

BTW, DFEing isn't necessarily a sign of guilt, she could just be trying to escape all the online hounding she's certainly getting.
 
Last edited:
Yet America has never had a female president and the majority of politicians and those who are in positions of power are male. So how are White women responsible for America's downfall? Oh, and before it's said, White women are not a monolith. We don't share the same views, opinions or politics nor do we vote as a bloc.

It's staggering how easily White men were brainwashed and manipulated into being fucking vile towards women and mothers. Then you wonder why women increasingly want nothing more to do with White men.

Enjoy your extinction. You get what you fucking deserve.
> Retarded republican politics obsessed white woman sends mob to harass random white woman without verifying source and larping as a "investigative reporter"
> Specifically says "Make this woman internet famous"
> Says "Liberal white woman are the downfall of this country"
> Decides maybe she should check for proof after destroying this random woman's reputation.
> Says don't harass people after specifically calling for people to harass this woman.

I think your missing the point or your just retarded
 
Name me a person who did a thing to anger the internet that had their lives ruined more than temporarily. The ‘It’s ma’am’ tranny? The antifa that clobbered a Trump supporter with a bike lock? The dude who shot Ashli Babbit? Sure if there is sustained cause to pay attention to them they probably become lolcows and get harassed like Fatrick, but if it’s just one incident and they lay low for a month people move on. Sorry if that offends your need for revenge dude. That’s just reality. Hell who even remembers the mom that got Harambe killed?
I've heard that these people do actually continue to get harassed. There is always a small group of people keeping tabs on them and making the information known. The internet is big, there's a lot of people, and people get really worked up over animals. I bet in ten years she will still have to hide.
honestly whats with women getting pissed off in this particular thread? It feels kind of strange. Do they feel some kind of kinship with the woman that caused this? I completely understand the man hate thread and such and i wouldn't wanna take it away or go fight with them in it but this thread seems like a strange place to bring the battle of the sexes.
They just don't like how the cultural climate is turning on white women. It scares them. It's very deserved though.
 
To contrast; my dad absolutely loved animals to a point where he'd sometimes become irresponsible. He accidentally became a de facto horse breeder for a while because baby foals are goofy and cute. He wasn't in for an ego boost, he just liked animals.
My mom is exactly the same. She would take in anything if it needed help. When I was a kid, our neighborhood had tons of feral cats because no one would fix them. She ended up spaying and neutering the whole colony single-handedly. Took her about ten years.

They're not the type of people I'm talking about. The type I'm referring to are the ones who endlessly virtue signal on facebook or whatever about how they volunteer for shelters, how difficult their work with animals is but they do it out of dedication, and who passive-aggressively snipe at other volunteers/rehabbers about how they're "not doing it correctly." They're happy to sabotage someone if they believe their cause is righteous and they always do. Think pitmommies' behavior, but less overtly unhinged.
 
Do any of you have actual evidence that this woman was responsible? Deleting her social media accounts (no doubt after a flood of accusations/harassment came pouring in) isn't proof of anything.

I really, really hope this isn't some lame Reddit-tier witch hunt operating on bad info.

The account that posted that Monica Keasler was the one who called it in has deleted the post: Link

She's claiming she got the info from squirrel man himself Link (A)

This would be why I cautioned against immediately going hot over it. I could verify none of this shit when it was listed and until actual evidence surfaces, allegations remain just that.
 
Peanut was way better than Floyd.

I feel that an argument that even if you had "people > animals" as a stance that gets voided if you're a big abortion supporter. To say nothing that one was a pet and the other was a remorseless criminal. (That being said, the fact that George Floyd even existed is an excellent pro-abortion argument, but curiously never gets used.)
 
I’m probably late for this but Monica not only supports and does photography for drag queen story hour. But wants DRAG QUEEN SLEEPOVERS!
Normally I’m like “what can you expect she’s a stupid bitch” but after this. No. She needs to face the wall. It’s infuriating that I know she will learn nothing. She’s going to private all her accounts. Cry to the media. probably sue someone and get rich if this experience.
IMG_6010.jpeg
 
I’m probably late for this but Monica not only supports and does photography for drag queen story hour. But wants DRAG QUEEN SLEEPOVERS!
Normally I’m like “what can you expect she’s a stupid bitch” but after this. No. She needs to face the wall. It’s infuriating that I know she will learn nothing. She’s going to private all her accounts. Cry to the media. probably sue someone and get rich if this experience.
View attachment 6599503
“Leave your kids with mentally unwell men overnight for free photos!”
That’s a little blatant prostitution isn’t it?
 
if he had any dignity or honour he should have snapped his own neck the moment he understood a kid died because of his action.


(That being said, the fact that George Floyd even existed is an excellent pro-abortion argument, but curiously never gets used.)
I'm firmly opposed to murdering the unborn as it goes against my religious principles.
 
Id like to think if this rule is being done SANELY, vaccinated cats wouldn't be killed. At least thats the idea, that vaccine mostly works, but after an encounter, update vaccines?
I think this is mostly new york and particular being clown world.
I guess I'll have to go find out what my state does and actually find out whether that vaccine works or has been like the flu shot all along.

People can rate me dumb all they want but im firmly going to keep them vaccinated if it means they wont get put down/die of rabies if they get out, but I certainly won't if it can't save them at all.

I do hope you're right for values of not new york.
 
Back