Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
The utter thud of a professed balldo-needer making rection jokes. DO YOU SEE YOURSELF, SIR???
What tha fuck man! Not all of us can afford a NYT subscription for your elitist bullshit tomato sauces you know!

Give us the recipe!
oh no, really? I thought it just came up.

Hold on, here you go:

Marcella Hazan's Tomato Sauce

Yield: 4 servings
Time: 1 hour

Ingredients:
  • 2 cups tomatoes, in addition to their juices (for example, a 28-ounce can of San Marzano whole peeled tomatoes)
  • 5 tablespoons butter
  • 1 onion, peeled and cut in half
  • Salt

PREPARATION​

  1. Combine the tomatoes, their juices, the butter and the onion halves in a saucepan. Add a pinch or two of salt.
  2. Place over medium heat and bring to a simmer. Cook, uncovered, for about 45 minutes. Stir occasionally, mashing any large pieces of tomato with a spoon. Add salt as needed.
  3. Discard the onion before tossing the sauce with pasta. This recipe makes enough sauce for a pound of pasta.

***I keep the onion bc I love big chunks of onion (which mellows and sweetens in the sauce). I also quarter it rather than just halve it. Also, sometimes you need to cut off the tip-end of some of the tomatoes bc they have a hard stem-bottom.
 
A special pasta (for him)? Will it be seasoned with a copious amount of cocaine?
I'm assuming Nick started streaming the moment he got his kids back just to "own the haters" and pretend like they've always been there.
I am willing to bet it’s a “special pasta (for him)” because the kids are back in the house for the first time in a while.
 
Its MINNESOTA LAW NERD!

Under Minnesota Law, everyone who talks to Nick is his client. Nick would never actually speak to anyone he didn't consider a client.

So stop talking about Nick and his case because MINNESOTA LAW. You can't possibly understand it with an Ohio or NEW YORK CITY understanding of the law. You can only know about it if you are Nick.

MINNESOTA LAW!

Now GET IN THAT LOCKER!
Didn't Ethan Ralph try and pull this on Rekieta back around when they were still feuding?
Ethan asked Nick a legal question in DMs and when Nick talked about it Ethan got all pissed because it should have been attorney client privilege? I don't know Ralph's lore that well so I might be misremembering.
 
When and how did I establish an attorney client relationship with Balldo?
I took the ham sandwiches being nasty as legal advice, as they could get me into some kind of criminal trouble.
24.11.04 - Ham sandwiches.png
I have an attorney-client relationship with you now, Sean. Be careful what you disclose about these damn sandwiches.
 
Criticize this niggas shit cooking skills. Fucking 3 sources of fat that he keeps adding shit to, re-searing steaks, didn't make a roux,"braising" fully cooked steaks in cooked sauce, he hasn't drained the pasta in 20 minutes.
I hate to say it because I've seen worse, including Kurt's. He's actually not as bad as the weird shit Kurt has done. I'm not sure why you'd even braise steak at all, and the pasta is by no means al dente. I can't watch this since I'm not paying locals a dime for this faggot's content and not interested enough to watch anyway.

Just from the stills, you've pointed out everything I've seen wrong.

That said, it'd probably be. . .well, edible. He's not as bad as cooking as he is at law.

It's not that it's staggeringly bad so much as who cares?
  • 2 cups tomatoes, in addition to their juices (for example, a 28-ounce can of San Marzano whole peeled tomatoes)
My only disagreement with this is I do not like the juices they come in. They're bitter and nasty. Even the Cento brand I like. I also smash them by hand at the beginning, I like it chunky. I also keep the onions.

I also tend to like it thick so the lack of fluid is no big deal, but I'll add water, tomato juice, Clamato, V8, or whatever, and if it needs to be a little thicker, add triple-concentrated tomato paste a bit at a time until it's nice. Or even a bit of anchovy paste. Or fish sauce.

The nice thing about that specific recipe is you can veer off into something like a puttanesca pretty easily just by adding capers, maybe some eggplant.
Nick talking about lawtube and the assumptions people are making about his representation
"...[T]hat assumes I'm hiring a practicing attorney but I'm doing the casework, which is dumb. I'm not. I wish I was because I would do it way different."
That isn't how hiring a lawyer works. In fact, that is buttfuck retarded.

Either he never knew this, he has forgotten it from drug-induced brain damage, or this is just some fairy tale lie for his braindead locals retards.

Attorney-client is not like surgeon-patient. A client is considered competent, barring extreme circumstances, to decide the nature of the defense and how it is carried out. While the duty shares some similarities to that of the surgeon in that an attorney can't commit outright malpractice (for instance with a surgeon that might be leaving a scalpel inside the patient and sewing them shut), or assist in fraud or perjury, in general, the attorney is obligated to carry out the client's wishes.

If the attorney is so absolutely adamant that he can't follow the course of conduct the client requires, so long as it is legal and nonfrivolous, there is a duty to withdraw as counsel for irreconcilable disagreement, with all reasonable effort put into making the transition smooth.

Nick is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT LYING that he's just paying tens of thousands to lawyers and they're gallivanting around doing whatever they want. This might be the case with some shyster who has a layperson for a client and has sold him a bill of goods.

Nick may not be a very good lawyer but he damn well knows he's in charge. If he would have done it differently he should have hired someone to do it his way or do it himself, the dumb lying faggot stooge.

This is Nick's bullshit that pisses me off. He pretends to be a professional and tells utter lies anyone who knows anything about the profession knows are lies, to dupe people into believing his absolute lies of victimhood.
 
Last edited:
I hate to say it because I've seen worse, including Kurt's. He's actually not as bad as the weird shit Kurt has done. I'm not sure why you'd even braise steak at all, and the pasta is by no means al dente. I can't watch this since I'm not paying locals a dime for this faggot's content and not interested enough to watch anyway.

Just from the stills, you've pointed out everything I've seen wrong.

That said, it'd probably be. . .well, edible. He's not as bad as cooking as he is at law.

It's not that it's staggeringly bad so much as who cares?
Cuckeita's committing culinary crimes (couldn't resist the alliteration!) and all you want to do is stand around while watching that room of yours burn to the ground???

Harrumph! HARRUMPH, I say, good sir!!!
 
There is a lot of chatter from our wife and kids going on right now Kid asked about boulder berries whatever that means
stream died again
I don't know if it is just because she is trying to be quiet but our wife doesn't sound normal
I don't have to feed seven because not all of them will eat this
it's just noodles and meat

leaving those cleaning supplies in reach of the kids.

What if there is... BLEACH...!? Do you know how DANGEROUS that is yi children!?

You're supposed to negotiate a plea through your lawyer if you have representation. Does he really think people don't know this?

These are the not-lies Nick thinks are clever. Up there with 'I don't habd a trust. Trusts are setup for your benefit' bullshite.
 
You're supposed to negotiate a plea through your lawyer if you have representation. Does he really think people don't know this?
Yet another of the lies this faggot can't stop telling. There's even a rule outright prohibiting attorneys from communicating directly with represented parties. He's told this lie before too because I remember citing this rule.

From the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct:

Rule 4.2 Communication with Person Represented by Counsel​

In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order.
Does this mean what it obviously means on its face? Yes.
COMMUNICATION WITH REPRESENTED PARTIES
By
William J. Wernz, Director
Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Reprinted from Bench & Bar of Minnesota (December 1987)
Rule 4.2 of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) governs communication with
persons represented by counsel.

In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with
a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the
consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so.

The general purpose of the rule is to prevent a lawyer from exploiting represented but unadvised
parties. If an attorney were permitted to deal directly with a represented party, this might breach the
party’s attorney-client relationship, deny the party the assistance of available counsel, and cause the party
to make inadvisable settlements or admissions.
https://lprb.mncourts.gov/articles/Articles/Communication With Represented Parties 1987.pdf

Nick knows this, even in his current borderline Wernicke-Korsakoff state. He's just lying and trying to make it look like NOT committing a blatant ethical violation is somehow some unique Minnesota thing with him being persecuted.

I'll note that as with the overwhelming majority of states, the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct largely track the Model Rules of Professional Conduct promulgated by the ABA throughout the entire United States.
 
You don’t have to be a Michelin star chef to follow a recipe.
You don't have to be a chef but you do have to learn techniques. It's not just a matter of combining ingredients, which is why two different people can make exactly the same recipe and have it turn out differently (I recently got a new stove and I'm still learning what adjustments I need to make as I cook things on it for the first time).
 
I hate to say it because I've seen worse, including Kurt's. He's actually not as bad as the weird shit Kurt has done. I'm not sure why you'd even braise steak at all, and the pasta is by no means al dente. I can't watch this since I'm not paying locals a dime for this faggot's content and not interested enough to watch anyway.

Just from the stills, you've pointed out everything I've seen wrong.

That said, it'd probably be. . .well, edible. He's not as bad as cooking as he is at law.

It's not that it's staggeringly bad so much as who cares?

That isn't how hiring a lawyer works. In fact, that is buttfuck retarded.

Either he never knew this, he has forgotten it from drug-induced brain damage, or this is just some fairy tale lie for his braindead locals retards.

Attorney-client is not like surgeon-patient. A client is considered competent, barring extreme circumstances, to decide the nature of the defense and how it is carried out. While the duty shares some similarities to that of the surgeon in that an attorney can't commit outright malpractice (for instance with a surgeon that might be leaving a scalpel inside the patient and sewing them shut), or assist in fraud or perjury, in general, the attorney is obligated to carry out the client's wishes.

If the attorney is so absolutely adamant that he can't follow the course of conduct the client requires, so long as it is legal and nonfrivolous, there is a duty to withdraw as counsel for irreconcilable disagreement, with all reasonable effort put into making the transition smooth.

Nick is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT LYING that he's just paying tens of thousands to lawyers and they're gallivanting around doing whatever they want. This might be the case with some shyster who has a layperson for a client and has sold him a bill of goods.

Nick may not be a very good lawyer but he damn well knows he's in charge. If he would have done it differently he should have hired someone to do it his way or do it himself, the dumb lying faggot stooge.

This is Nick's bullshit that pisses me off. He pretends to be a professional and tells utter lies anyone who knows anything about the profession knows are lies, to dupe people into believing his absolute lies of victimhood.
Here's the stream, nigga.

It's a lot of him seething and adding way too much pepper to burn in his sauce. There's no veggies either. I'd either do a fall salad or some sort of broccoli green if I were him, but I wouldn't make noodles with American Wagyu (shit product do not buy, get a cut that's actually good for what you are making if you are that fucking dumb with money). His sauce is way too watery from the sounds of it and he keeps adding fucking fats. The steak already adds a good amount, but then he adds butter, tallow, and cold butter to a warm sauce. It sounds like someone dropping turds into a bowl.

@Null as an Eyetalian-Amerimutt can we get your opinion before you get your Bossman clips ready for the election stream/ Trump YMCA compilations. I hope you have fun with the Canadians tomorrow and you have some Rekieta content if you guys have nothing to talk about.
 
In case anyone missed it, Nick's tattoo starts with the character 怒 (anger), but since only the top half is visible here it appears to say 奴 (slave).

10/10 would laugh again
怒 is also composed of 奴 (slave) and 心 (heart), which can be construed as he's a submissive slave (to the KKK) at heart.
That's why you should never get these foreign language tattoos. There's so many ways to interpret it and 100% of the time it can be sexual, deviant, or degenerate. It just depends on how good and convincing the person is.

膽 as a noun is some kind of bitter plant in the story of a Chinese emperor taking bites from a bitter plant to remind him of complacency. 臥薪嘗膽,he was slouched on a bed of straws. We can construe this as a bitter taste in Skelly's mouth, as he's slouched on the cuck chair watching Energii King and 12 Actions' show.

Moral of the story: don't get tattoos.
 
Back