2024 U.S. Presidential and State election thread - I'm gonna... I'm gonna... VOOT!!! I'm VOOOOOTING!!!

Who are you voting for?


  • Total voters
    3,694
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well. With the 2020 and 2024 election data, you and anyone else on the left in media, in academia or anywhere else has a golden opportunity where those 20 million votes came from in 2020 and where they went in 2024.

SOMETHING odd happened. Did 20 million democratic voters from 2020 all really decide this election not to vote at all? Because that is what the numbers are saying. Those votes didn't go to trump. They just disappeared from the election entirely.

Those votes are not there in 2016, they appear in 2020, they are gone in 2024.

If there are 20 million democratic voters who didn't vote this time, you would think that would be a big story that even democrats would want to understand. That it would be a big part of the post-election coverage. But no. Silence.
Tbh probably the covid narrative motivating people the narrative of comic blamed trump despite its worst problems basically being out of his hands then Biden got in things didn't get better probably a strong contingent who don't care for either side even more and thus a lower turnout at least that's my guess if any or there was fuckery idk
 
I asked my eight-year old sister “Who won the election?” because she told me earlier-unprompted-that Trump win. She said Trump won and that she voted for him, and apparently at school they have a mock election and Trump won. Lmao.
Even the toddlers want Trump.
I can only imagine the terror little ones experience when they hear The Kackler
 
I told this to some friends eight years ago, but out there in public, try to keep your heads down for a while. Especially if you're in a blue state. Don't bring the election up yourselves, and if anyone directly asks you, lie and say you voted blue. Let things simmer down. I expect fuckery out there for at least a month before everyone gets distracted with a shiny new toy of a problem.

I'm more worried about Trump voters who are unarmed than I am about anyone panicking that he won.
 
MSNBC's Joy Reid criticizes white female voters for not supporting Harris.

View attachment 6613646
nigresses will always seethe over white women. thats because white women will always be more attractive and smarter than those ugly fat sheboon gorilla apes that not even their own men want. fat, bald, bloated, smelly and grotesque just as they are on the inside.
white women exist and sheboon nigresses seethe.jpg
 
It's hundreds of pages back at this point, but there was that tweet where the poster (I forget the name) had said something to the effect of "now I kind of hope Trump wins just so all the people whining that they're going to be put into camps and deported have to spend the next 4 years living out their ordinary, miserable, mundane lives". That was a pretty good one.

I assume you mean this image.

Screenshot 2024-11-06 020032.png
 
I'd like to believe that Trump supporters are accepting of women and don't scapegoat white women, but this thread has so much seething in it, I'm not convinced. It's like, am I being shown acceptance, because they see me as someone who's trust they want to earn? Or do they see me as a shiftless irresponsible moron who's genetically incapable of leadership?
No, you're looking at it wrong.

Look if I've never seen a man dance on the head of a pin, I am very skeptical about the idea that a man could dance on the head of a pin. I'm as open to the idea of men dancing on the head of a pin, as I am to a woman running for president succesfully (but more importantly: having the leadership capabilities to do well as one). It's worth pointing out that the vast majority of men don't have the stuff for it either (I know I wouldn't). But I can look at others and see when they're uniquely unqualified. Kamala is an example who profoundly misses those type of capabilities. Hillary was actually better in comparison, because she was absolutely ruthless and a power broker. Her problem wasn't capacity like it is for Kamala or Jeb, but rather that's she too selfish.

I'd be happy to vote for a woman if she actually displayed the skills to do well in the role. Those skills are rare in general, and they're rarer in women than in men. The other issue is that a significant amount of people are so hungry for a first woman president that they'll hitch their ride to women who have no business running, in typical DEI fashion. I do see you as a moron, but it's not because you're a woman, it's because you're taking a mild shitpost as a case of serious sexism, and second I see most people as idiots (myself included), basicly anyone that writes and says things that doesn't broaden my view. If you say something I could have thought of myself, you're probably not that bright. I think that's a decent measuring stick for idiocy, if anyone has a better one let me know.

Because you know what the thing is? If a woman genuinely has the leadership capacity, she also has the wit and vision to make people see it, whether they're biased or not. You think people aren't biased against Trump too? Don't mexicans have plenty of reason to be biased against him? Yet they voted for him almost 40%. Because he had a campaign that managed to overcome the bias they might have against him for things he said. Don't you think women have a bias against him? Everybody has biases. Women need to get off their fucking high horse and think they're the only victims in the world.

I don't know if you're genetically incapable of leadership, but I know you personally probably are incapable of leadership, for the sole reason that you're asking this question. That you're a woman is just confirming my biases, it's not the starting point. How could it be any other way? Do you want special treatment? Isn't that the opposite of having good leadership if you need that?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back