BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Sargon's wife's son said:
You know why these people really hate Nazis I've said it like 6 times in this thread but they're just angry that the Nazis can appeal to the working class and they can't and that the leaders of most fascist movements were working class men.
And that almost all the leaders of communist movements were nepo babies who mommy and daddy paid for everything
Click to expand...
They don't actually care about the “working class” they are just pawns, bodies to be thrown at enemies and discarded when needed. The soviets didn't go to war with nazi Germany because of any moral or ethical objections no, they went to war because the nazis betrayed them, before they could Betray the nazis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kyria the Great, Wünderkind, Cactuar King and 2 others
Levitcus prime24 said:
They don't actually care about the “working class” they are just pawns, bodies to be thrown at enemies and discarded when needed. The soviets didn't go to war with nazi Germany because of any moral or ethical objections no, they went to war because the nazis betrayed them, before they could Betray the nazis.
Click to expand...

The left doesn't think in terms of individuals, except for themselves, generally speaking. The further left you go the more this is true.

They have what would be called an external locus of control, which basically means that all of their failures, sins and shortcomings as a person are the result of some external influence. Even all of human nature is molded by external influences. Now this is an internally inconsistent view of the world. It is also of course egocentric. They think of people not as discrete units but as masses of communities (class, race) whose consensus can either help or harm them and their conception of what the world should be. And usually what the world should be is something that serves the needs of their ego. The world should always align with their desires.

Those to the right usually have an internal locus of control. The failures, sins and shortcomings of the individual are the fault of the individual, through their own choices or because of some inherent flaw in the individual or humanity as a whole. This worldview has its shortcomings, for instance a too great acceptance of hierarchy, but has the advantage of being internally consistent and being more in line with reality. The Founders were right wingers that realized the shortcomings of right wing thought because of their understanding of history and so they grafted liberalism onto a right wing framework. The pursuit of happiness vs happiness, etc.


Wow that's a lot of words. Don't know if anyone will read it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Autistic
Reactions: AnticitizenOne, jray4559, Adjustable Autism and 5 others
IPOS finally did something smart, if only to save whatever meager relevance he still has.

IMG_4787.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: babadook, Super Kami Guru, Absolute-Despair and 17 others
  • Like
Reactions: Absolute-Despair, AnticitizenOne, Caligura and 4 others
Levitcus prime24 said:
I assume couch red pill is the right wing version of badempanada
Click to expand...
He was a somewhat major news story early this year when he died in Ukrainian custody. You might have heard of him referred to by his real name, Gonzalo Lira

Don't know if he even necessarily qualified as rightwing. He was definitely more rightwing than leftwing, but I don't believe that he had any values.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Wünderkind, Blah de Blah, Levitcus prime24 and 1 other person
Surfin Terf said:
He was a somewhat major news story early this year when he died in Ukrainian custody. You might have heard of him referred to by his real name, Gonzalo Lira

Don't know if he even necessarily qualified as rightwing. He was definitely more rightwing than leftwing, but I don't believe that he had any values.
Click to expand...
his only values were being a sexpest
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Levitcus prime24 and Edgeymcedgename
WhiskeyJack said:
So their plan is to just pretend that those missing 10+ million Democrat voters actually exist and weren't just a figment of purple-haired poll workers double-counting the same ballots over and over again for a week after the election in 2020?
Click to expand...
If ballots were double-counted 10 million times, then it'd be easy enough to prove when a district's vote tally massively outnumbers the number of people on the voter roll who were recorded as having voted.

And if they could double-count ballots that easily, then they woild have done it again
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lobster Cult High Priest, Surfin Terf and Edgeymcedgename
Edgeymcedgename said:
Weird Question, I don't know if anyone here will know what I'm asking but.

Do you guys think the left will put the woke away now or double down?
Click to expand...
Liberals/mainstream Democrats will speedrun their shift into basically becoming pozzed Bush era neocons. If you look at Kamala’s platform the only “progressive” policy positions was your basic “protect trannies and courageous black women” idpol shit.

The left will continue infighting over stupid shit and the woke “men with beards have biologically female brains” retards are so entrenched that they’ll continue dominating the discourse. The smarter ones realize that they have no appeal with working class people but they have no clue how to change that because most of the influential names in the left come from rich/upper middle class backgrounds and have no clue how to actually talk with them.

In short: liberals will become more soy and leftists will double down on being faggots

Maybe Maupin was right about breadtube being a psyop
:story:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Super Kami Guru, AshtonsMoobs and 12 others
H3LLH4MM3R666 said:
If ballots were double-counted 10 million times, then it'd be easy enough to prove when a district's vote tally massively outnumbers the number of people on the voter roll who were recorded as having voted.

And if they could double-count ballots that easily, then they woild have done it again
Click to expand...
Depends entirely how widely distributed they were.

There’s also tons of people on the voter rolls that never vote, are dead, aren’t living in the district anymore, and so on. Covering for ballot fraud is precisely why the Dems fight to stop the rolls getting cleaned up, and push the to prevent voter ID laws going in place.

As for doing it again. they clearly tried in places but with 350k poll watchers and lawyers everywhere, it was much more difficult. This sort of fraud is also not well coordinated, it’s more putting corrupt people in place and letting them do what comes natural. Arizona they are still trying it, that’s more coordinated and they feel more legally protected.
 
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: VaraeIon115, Obstacle and Surfin Terf
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back