- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
That’s the thing, though. Kamala actually RECOGNIZED that trannies are electoral poison and decided shutting the fuck up was the best course of action (one of the few smart things she did). Troons in women’s sports and cock chops for prisoners might be the position of the Dem orthodoxy but they certainly weren’t issues that she was actively going out to bat for.The next few years are going to be pretty interesting if I have to go back to arguing with disingenuous retards on the right instead of the left like it's the 00's.
I said what I said and meant it:
If you're enough of a fucking retard to not understand the problem then I'll go ahead and just go back to enjoying the fact that the U.S. missed a bullet with Kamala rather than trying to speak reason. And the fact that hopefully the people who actually did work to get Trump elected rather than shooting the shit on the internet like the people here - myself included - will be smart enough to understand the principle that if someone just fell off of a cliff, maybe you shouldn't follow directly in their footsteps.
By the way, if you're resorting to "when did you stop beating your wife?" tier questions to justify your position on a topic, you should re-examine it.
It was in fact Trump who ran on that social issue and won. The whole “Kamala is for they/them” attack ads weren’t attacking her current platform, it was to force her to take the fence post out of her ass and take a side, knowing that being pro-troon would alienate all the normies but being anti-troon would alienate the progressive base.
The takeaway from this isn’t that running on social issues is bad - in fact it seems to have been quite effective, given the number of anti-troon ads the Trump campaign ran. Kamala didn’t lose because she ran on social issues, she lost because she was on the wrong side of this one.
Last edited: