- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
I'm just trying to figure out how Bond is set Tuesday is derived from the post "Bond is set will have the money Tuesday". Damn the autism here..lol
Actually she said "we will be able to pay it on Tuesday." It's an odd way to phrase it. She's used the word "set" and not "granted" I know it seems insignificant but it's not. Bonds are pretty standard amounts and saying one will be a set amount isn't a big deal, but it being granted is another matter. Greta is obviously stupid about this shit so I can't say if the set/granted thing is her just not knowing the lingo or not. But I'd be surprised if they didn't have the money on hand (Usually $1,500 cash) that she wouldn't just say that and make it an opportunity to fundraise more.
I would expect a "We need $1,500 to free Nina from ICE detention TODAY." Seriously, they are instead going to patiently wait three more days for money to arrive? Where is this money coming from and why does it take that long? Maybe there is some wishful thinking or misunderstanding of the actual specifics. Either way something doesn't quite add up.
I'd have to start writing a novel to explain this but a bond hearing will always be on the same day of a master calendar hearing - I think that's what the hold up is - it's not a matter of just waiting for the money to arrive. She needs her master calendar hearing, her status must be reviewed by a judge and her next court appearance must be scheduled before they allow her to bond out. The master calendar hearing might be what the hold up is, but they don't have a bail hearing w/o following it with a master calendar hearing, it's a package deal.
I'd be shocked and amazed if she's already been before a IJ on a holiday weekend, but anything is possible I guess. (And if she is bonded out her next court appearance will be probably be a year from now, no joke, that's how overburdened the system is.)
As I said, there are missing pieces of information here that make this hard to predict. If Nina actually has a I-130 pending then she might be on her way to a greencard, but even if that's the case her working these past two years is a big fucking no-no and a sure fire way to get your application denied.
I've got shit going on for NYE at the moment but will try to explain more later.
But I can't stress how critical the proof that she has been working illegally is in this matter, it was her biggest mistake and one that can spell her doom if ICE/NCIS finds out regardless of her being married to a citizen.
Here's some standard text info that clarifies some issues about a bond hearing.
Although the bond hearing is separate from the Master Calendar Hearing, it usually takes place on the same day, but just before your first Master Calendar Hearing.
Since you will be in custody, you will be transported to your bond hearing by immigration officials. If you are detained at a facility that has an immigration court onsite, you will be physically present in the courtroom for your hearing. If you are at a facility that does not have an immigration court onsite, you will appear through a video link that goes to the courtroom or you will be transported by bus to the immigration court.
When you are led into the courtroom you will not be in handcuffs or shackles, but you will be wearing federally issued clothes and shoes and be monitored by security guards. The security guards will tell you where to sit to wait your turn for a hearing and you will not be permitted to speak or interact with any family members who may have come to your hearing. The only person you will be able to speak with prior to the hearing is your attorney.
To start your bond hearing, the IJ will review your immigration status in the U.S. and make sure you are eligible for a bond. Then, the IJ will decide whether to grant you the bond. This decision is ultimately up to the IJ’s discretion – in other words, even if there is nothing legally preventing the IJ from giving you a bond, he or she may still deny you a bond if he or she does not want to give you one based on the IJ’s perception of your character or past behavior.
To make this discretionary decision, the IJ will weigh any evidence in the record to determine whether you are a flight risk or a danger to the safety and security of the United States. Factors the IJ will consider to determine whether you are a flight risk include your family ties in the U.S., whether you own or rent a home or apartment, whether you are employed, and whether you qualify for any forms of relief from removal (such as asylum or a marriage-based green card).
To help the IJ determine that you are not a flight risk, you can invite your close family members to attend your bond hearing if they are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents (LPRs). You should also provide the IJ with copies of birth certificates for any U.S.-born children, a marriage certificate to your spouse if he or she is in the U.S. legally, a letter from your employer and/or pay stubs to show employment, and letters from family and friends showing you have ties to the community and the United States.
During the bond hearing, the IJ will ask you (or your attorney) questions about your family ties, employment, or past criminal history. If you are not represented by an attorney, you would respond to the IJ’s questions directly. Family members who attend your bond hearing will likely not be asked to testify, but you can point them out to the IJ when responding to questions about your family and their presence in the courtroom will provide concrete proof that you do have family in the U.S. who support you and care for you.
To determine whether you are a danger to the U.S., the IJ will look to your past criminal history. Any arrests, including Driving Under the Influence (DUI), will be considered. If you do have any past criminal history, it’s a good idea to provide letters from friends and family that talk about your good moral character and how you have changed for the better since any past criminal behavior, or provide proof of participation and/or completion of rehabilitation programs (anger management, substance abuse
Last edited: