State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Useful_Mistake]

Damn so much happened since i left.

Just a clarification on the post you quoted. He was reauthorized to practice law a few days later.

 

[Swole McPole]

The children were taken from Nick.
The kids were taken to their stupid activities.
Nick is busy because he is taken up with drug abuse.
Nick was taken in by an exotic Jamaican dancer.
Nick wants Elissa clips taken off the internet.
Nick wants Aaron taken down for spurning him.
Nick has been taken through the legal ringer.
Nick was taken by April's vapidness and waifish form.
Nick was taken for a sucker by that same exotic dancer.

Nick has repeatedly been taken up the arse at Gay 90's and Hedonism II.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Nick has repeatedly been taken up the arse at Gay 90's and Hedonism II.

You forgot Pure Pleasure.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

You forgot Pure Pleasure.

The revelation of the "gay bays" at the Sodomy Barn feel like ages ago. I wish he'd gotten arrested there instead of at his house. Would've been loads funnier and the bodycam footage wouldn't have half-starved kids crying.

 

[MunsterCheeseJr]

So the allegations are true that Nick had access to Aaron's google services, paypal transaction information, gmail & home security cameras for 11 months. And passed some of this information off to Melton who is obsessed with Aaron's children.

So you have possible correspondence with Aaron's lawyer. Possible correspondence with police officers.

At one point Nick was acting as the lawyer (or attempting to act as the lawyer) for himself, his wife & April. Aaron was a presumed witness. While Nick's wife was pursuing "revenge porn" charges against Aaron.

@Potentially Criminal What if someone reports Nick to the Minnesota Bar. Now who would do that? Nobody here (and strangers on the internet would probably get ignored anyway). But if this is brought before a judge in any of the court case? I can very easily see a judge forwarding this issue on to the Minnesota Bar, and the bar would not ignore a report from a judge.

Would Aaron's lawyer report this to the bar? The prosecutors on any of the cases? Any of the local lawyers that seem to really hate Nick? Would any of those lawyers have a professional obligation to report it?

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Only once in a lifetime does a lawyer come around with this level of undisputable skill and talent, and is able to convert a slap on the wrist drug charge into multiple felonies and years in jail.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

Rekeita should have called Saul.

 

[waffle]

I really hope Nick has already gotten ahold of his lawyer to fire off am email accepting the plea offer that was made. Here you could beat them with the mailbox rule before it gets revoked first thing Tuesday morning. (Today is vet's day).

I wonder if they're going to wrap him up on a bond violation for his obvious and public witness tampering before they file new charges?

Can they do no bond in MN? What id expect to happen here would be for his bond to get revoked even if they didn't file new charges. Or he gets put on house arrest with.a no Internet condition like some kind of pedophile.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I really hope Nick has already gotten ahold of his lawyer to fire off am email accepting the plea offer that was made. Here you could beat them with the mailbox rule before it gets revoked first thing Tuesday morning. (Today is vet's day).

I wonder if they're going to wrap him up on a bond violation for his obvious and public witness tampering before they file new charges?

Can they do no bond in MN? What id expect to happen here would be for his bond to get revoked even if they didn't file new charges. Or he gets put on house arrest with.a no Internet condition like some kind of pedophile.

I wonder what this will mean for Kayla. Did she know about this? Was she party to it? Has she been out of the picture and can claim no involvement? Will Nick take the fall on his own or will he implicate Kayla and April too?

What this could mean for all current lawsuits is pretty extensive tbh.
But we will get new additions.

Even IF they accept pleas quickly, they will still get new charges.

 

[Heed Not]

Even IF they accept pleas quickly, they will still get new charges.

I'm pretty sure with even a whiff of witness intimidation and unauthorized access of a witness' computer system, the judge had already decided he is rejecting any plea deal that's presented to him. Nick can't plea anymore, he just doesn't know it yet.

 

[AnOminous]

Can they do no bond in MN?

Yes, but the general presumption is you're supposed to be allowed bond, and its purpose (other than presenting an imminent public danger) is to ensure appearance, not to punish. I believe someone here said in Minnesota, you really have to screw up badly to get no bond.

They don't have to offer him an unconditional option, though, and they may very well modify the current arrangement to add more onerous restrictions to deter his ongoing deranged skelly rampage.

 

[waffle]

I believe someone here said in Minnesota, you really have to screw up badly to get no bond.

That's kind of what I was expecting, MN seems to treat pre-trial people with compassion to the point of foolishness. He didn't pull up on Aaron with a gun and threaten to ventilate him if he testifies, so they'll probably just add bond terms and let Nick continue to felt him self in public because they'll say it isn't a threat to public safety.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Oh, what's this?

Spoiler: Minnesota 609.891 UNAUTHORIZED COMPUTER ACCESS.

Subdivision 1.Crime.​

A person is guilty of unauthorized computer access if the person intentionally and without authorization attempts to or does penetrate a computer security system or electronic terminal.

Subd. 2.Felony.​

(a) A person who violates subdivision 1 in a manner that creates a grave risk of causing the death of a person is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
(b) A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent gross misdemeanor violation of subdivision 1 is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced under paragraph (a).
(c) A person who violates subdivision 1 by accessing, or attempting to access, an electronic terminal through opening any panel or access door without authorization and placing or attaching, or attempting to place or attach, an electronic device to capture, store, or communicate access device information is guilty of a felony.

Subd. 3.Gross misdemeanor.​

(a) A person who violates subdivision 1 in a manner that creates a risk to public health and safety is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not more than 364 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
(b) A person who violates subdivision 1 in a manner that compromises the security of data that are protected under section 609.52, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (, or are not public data as defined in section 13.02, subdivision 8a, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced under paragraph (a).
(c) A person who violates subdivision 1 and gains access to personal data is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced under paragraph (a).
(d) A person who is convicted of a second or subsequent misdemeanor violation of subdivision 1 within five years is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced under paragraph (a).
(e) A person who violates subdivision 1 by accessing, or attempting to access, an electronic terminal through opening, or attempting to open, any panel or access door without authorization is guilty of a gross misdemeanor and may be sentenced under paragraph (a).

Subd. 4.Misdemeanor.​

A person who violates subdivision 1 is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not more than 90 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.

This is the future you chose, Rekieta.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Has anyone done a sum up of the potential new charges Nick might be facing if all the allegations of him accessing Aaron's accounts are true? I've been running a rough summary in my head but figured I would write something down just as a fun exercise.

State:
Minnesota Statute § 609.891 - Computer Crimes: Unauthorized Access
Minnesota Statute § 609.746 - Invasion of privacy
Minnesota Statute § 609.50 - Interference with legal process
Minnesota Statute § 609.498 - Witness tampering
Minnesota Statute § 609.749 - Harrasment and stalking
Federal:
18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act(CFAA)
18 U.S.C. § 2510 - Electronic Communications Privacy Act(ECPA)

There are a few others bouncing around in my head like wire fraud(18 U.S.C. § 1343) and aiding an offender(Minnesota Statute § 609.495) but not sure how solid those would be.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

I really hope they record his sentencing hearing. I have a feeling Nick is going to have the same reaction as the 19 year old hood rat who thinks nothing will happen and then freaks out when he gets jail

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Has anyone done a sum up of the potential new charges Nick might be facing if all the allegations of him accessing Aaron's accounts are true? I've been running a rough summary in my head but figured I would write something down just as a fun exercise.

State:
Minnesota Statute § 609.891 - Computer Crimes: Unauthorized Access
Minnesota Statute § 609.746 - Invasion of privacy
Minnesota Statute § 609.50 - Interference with legal process
Minnesota Statute § 609.498 - Witness tampering
Minnesota Statute § 609.749 - Harrasment and stalking
Federal:
18 U.S.C. § 1030 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act(CFAA)
18 U.S.C. § 2510 - Electronic Communications Privacy Act(ECPA)

There are a few others bouncing around in my head like wire fraud(18 U.S.C. § 1343) and aiding an offender(Minnesota Statute § 609.495) but not sure how solid those would be.

18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights [LINK]​

"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate[...],
[...]They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both [...]"

18 U.S. Code § 875 - Interstate communications [LINK]​

"Whoever, with intent to extort from any person [...], any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee [...] or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant [LINK]​

"Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so [...] with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to (a) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding [...]

[...] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both."

18 U.S. Code § 2261A - Stalking [LINK]​

"Whoever-
(2)with the intent to [...] harass, intimidate [...] another person, uses [...] any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of conduct that—

(B) causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1)(A),
shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) or section 2261B, as the case may be." [AN: "for not more than 5 years"]

[EDIT] Removed one.

 

[Lemondale]

Nick is pilling all the crime so he can shoot himself in the end? or does he want the bbc so much he ends up stacking years to form a black bull polycule inside prison?

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

Is this the kinda thing the State presses after being informed or does Aaron need his lawyer to do a bunch of stuff to get the ball rolling?

By this point I almost feel Nick will get tard shielded like all good lolcows do.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Is this the kinda thing the State presses after being informed or does Aaron need his lawyer to do a bunch of stuff to get the ball rolling?

By this point I almost feel Nick will get tard shielded like all good lolcows do.

Those are all criminal charges that both the state and the feds should start to investigate as soon as they are made aware.
Obviously they first need to find out there is something to investigate.

Hard to predict how quickly this will move, depending on how serious they take these crimes and the risk of evidence being deleted, Nick might get to experience a second search of his house rather soon.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Is this the kinda thing the State presses after being informed or does Aaron need his lawyer to do a bunch of stuff to get the ball rolling?

By this point I almost feel Nick will get tard shielded like all good lolcows do.

When I woke up like 12 hours ago I checked Kiwi Farms expecting for sure it would be a repeat of May where I'd see "Nick Rekieta has been arrested..." on the top of the site. I still think that's likely in the next few days since this is like one step below the cokestream. And if he doesn't get popped for it, that's just more proof that Nick and Barnes are retards and there is no government conspiracy out to fuck him over.