"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

I haven't left any channels throughout different rotations of power. I really don't get it.
The biggest suspicion I have is one of two things - or both:
  1. Channels that were telling their viewers that Harris had it “in the bag” (Destiny) get angry/hate unsubscribes. They’ll be back.
  2. Platforms waiting until AFTER the election to hit some bot banning buttons, afraid to be accused of election interference if they moved sooner.
I lean more towards 2 in many cases especially things like Fatrick - as nobody is actually subscribed to that faggot.
 
Clarifying question: are you paying to follow/subscribe/be a member of those channels you mentioned?
No, and I have a no-recurring-charges policy in my financial life. I am forced by law to carry some insurance and there are rent and utilities, but anything nonessential must be free. I don't know how typical I am, so tell me what you think.
 
I don't know how typical I am, so tell me what you think.
I don't have any data so I couldn't make a guess better than a coin flip if it's typical or unusual thinking.

I think it's very different and unusual to revoke money from a commentator when your side loses(because there's no way it was Righties subscribing in numbers that high to peek behind Member's Only curtains) so I think it speaks to a mass disillusionment of lefty paypiggies. It could be other reasons though(the government is changing in a way I don't like so cut everything non-essential to go innawoods *LOL*).

It's very interesting to see the luxury political-left commentary economy experience a visible shake-up, and might continue to be an interesting story if it isn't temporary: it's one thing to see viewers flee Jim Stephanie Sterling, it would be another to see paying patrons take flight and have his content change to make his Boglin budget.
 
I think it's very different and unusual to revoke money from a commentator when your side loses(because there's no way it was Righties subscribing in numbers that high to peek behind Member's Only curtains)
I agree most of all with this -- in fact, it seems true believers would double down.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Haramburger
I agree most of all with this -- in fact, it seems true believers would double down.
Remember that leftoid YouTube is political onlyfans and their hot chick they simp for (the USA) just admitted she got a new boyfriend (Trump) - so they lash out in the only way they know.

Either that or underhanded funding from illegal political sources is being cut off. Perhaps there were “perform as the DNC needs and you’ll get five hundred paying subs magically” type deals bandied about.
 
Remember that leftoid YouTube is political onlyfans and their hot chick they simp for (the USA) just admitted she got a new boyfriend (Trump) - so they lash out in the only way they know.

Either that or underhanded funding from illegal political sources is being cut off. Perhaps there were “perform as the DNC needs and you’ll get five hundred paying subs magically” type deals bandied about.
Why would it be illegal?
 
I’ll be honest, I’m so glad I didn’t get around to just dropping the recommendation for old bay vodka in the thread and sent it in via superchat. I’d more thought it was a goofy thing dear sneeder would enjoy but now I kinda want to get a bottle myself…
Getting all kinds of drink recommendations from here. That's about the extent of my brainwashing. Thanks for perpetuating my alcoholism, I guess? I really thought I was gonna become super racist. 4/10
 
Yeah, as much as null was talking about the rekietta crime family, to the extent that exists it answers to the cow-father out in LA and Nick is just a Capo for JuJu.

The fact Nick fell in with him is probably more evidence his Bob wasn't much of a dad.
 
TDS Claims it's first recorded victim.


Saw it on Xitter


Gb_Fpx_W8AA2saq.jpg
 
Why would it be illegal?
Undisclosed political funding is illegal, but there are ways to "disclose" it that follow the letter of the law but not the spirit.

The spirit is "you should know if Null is saying X because he feels that way or because Trump paid him".

However, I suspect more of it is "platform illegal" (e.g., botted accounts/subscriptions) being shut off - because paying Destiny $10k to say "Camel good" is not as advantageous to him as spending the same $10k buying accounts and subscriptions for his channel, as the second makes him look more popular than he actually is.

We know that they were fucking around with astroturfing Reddit and X, so they're likely doing more and worse behind actual closed doors.
 
That's some vintage stuff, the original stalker child mentioned:
View attachment 6630638

The channel does not have the original stream, but Lunar Archive does, if anyone's interested, a real 3 hour banger:

The Kenny Jones one was hard to get through. I wouldn't have been able to keep my cool for that long. I felt bad for him at first, but over time, his predatory nature is both created and revealed because of his supercharged autism.
 
Ah.
Essentially, there is an exodus of several ministers, as well as the FDP splitting from the governing coalition.
This means that there is no effective government in Germany anymore because the remaining government parties have no majority in parliament.

The SPD and Greens want a vote of confidence to be held all the way in January, for a general election by March.
Of course, this means that they will use all the available time to rob the taxpayers blind, hide and delete evidence and traces of their crimes, and make sure to fit as many of their proteges in positions of power and to get as much money as possible. Also maybe to try to legally prohibit the AfD.
Meanwhile, the CDU, CSU, AfD (and I think? also the BSW) outright reject this and demand a vote of confidence as soon as possible.
My favourite German Chud, Eugyppius, is the guy I follow to keep abreast for German political gossip. He's usually seething pretty hard about the Traffic Light Co-coalition.
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/how-the-german-government-collapsed
Some people have told me that a Merz government would nevertheless constitute an important correction towards the centre-right, so in conclusion I hope you will allow me to dash your hopes on the remorseless reefs of reality.

The CDU have been aping the AfD and railing against mass migration for months. They even proposed draft legislation “to limit the illegal influx of third-country nationals to Germany.” One of the last acts of the FDP before the government collapsed, was to help shoot this legislation down in committee. Now, however, the FDP are in the opposition, and suddenly there is a theoretical majority for this law – if only the FDP joins the CDU, the AfD and the Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) in supporting it. Limiting migration is important, right? Strangely, though, the CDU have developed a mysterious anxiety about introducing any legislation until the elections, because they don’t want to pass anything with votes from the AfD or the migration-sceptical BSW. The CDU are happy to oppose migration, in other words, as long as their opposition has no chance of producing any real, tangible laws that will do anything to stop migration in the real world.

Maybe the CDU will at least do something about climatism, though? Maybe they’ll wind back all the Green insanity we’ve had to endure since 2021, like the building heating ordinances? Here again, hoping would be very foolish. The CDU have now made it clear that they consider Green policies on this front to be “irreversible.” They’ve been in secret talks with the Greens for months, and they’ve even produced a draft resolution confirming their support for Green climate targets. They hope merely to shift the emphasis away from Green industrial subsidies and specific technology requirements towards carbon pricing and emissions trading instead. They will also surely plead that some of the worst schemes – like the approaching ban on internal combustion engines – are EU-level policies and out of their hands.

You may have noticed, at this point, that there is a very long list of things that the CDU cannot do. There are the things they cannot do because they would require AfD votes, there are the things they cannot do because they need the Greens for their parliamentary majority, and there are the things they cannot do because of the European Union and NATO and god knows what else. Germany has locked itself into a highly pernicious trap of its own making here, and it will be one hapless government into the buzzsaw after the other, until our politicians figure out how to govern again, or are replaced by literally anybody with a minimal capacity to act.
 
That's some vintage stuff, the original stalker child mentioned:
View attachment 6630638

The channel does not have the original stream, but Lunar Archive does, if anyone's interested, a real 3 hour banger:

The 3 hour Kenny interview is my favorite piece of Josh audio, hands down. He really sheds light on the unsolvable problem. Kenny is open and honest and reveals in specific details that he is indeed too autistic not to stalk.
 
@Null The Glowies are intent on forcing out C++ from their codebases and ushering in "memory safe" languages ie. Rust. This has been the focal point in their recent reports published jointly with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and FBI on their "Safe By Design" initiative with MegaCorp and Silicon Valley stakeholders. SECURE BY DESIGN /
https://archive.ph/3iez7 / https://thenewstack.io/feds-critical-software-must-drop-c-c-by-2026-or-face-risk/ / https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/product-security-bad-practices / https://archive.ph/77851

As outlined in CISA’s Secure by Design initiative, software manufacturers should ensure that security is a core consideration from the onset of software development. This voluntary guidance provides an overview of product security bad practices that are deemed exceptionally risky, particularly for software manufacturers who produce software used in service of critical infrastructure or national critical functions (NCFs) and provides recommendations for software manufacturers to mitigate these risks.
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (hereafter referred to as the authoring organizations) developed this guidance to urge software manufacturers to reduce customer risk by prioritizing security throughout the product development process. This document is intended for software manufacturers who develop software products and services—including on-premises software, cloud services, and software as a service (SaaS)—used in support of critical infrastructure or NCFs. The authoring organizations strongly encourage all software manufacturers to avoid these product security bad practices. By following the recommendations in this guidance, manufacturers will signal to customers that they are taking ownership of customer security outcomes, a key Secure by Design principle. The guidance contained in this document is non-binding and while CISA encourages organizations to avoid these bad practices, this document imposes no requirement on them to do so.
---
The federal government is heightening its warnings about dangerous software development practices, with the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) issuing stark warnings about basic security failures that continue to plague critical infrastructure.


A recent report issued jointly by CISA and the FBI on Product Security Bad Practices warns software manufacturers about bad practices such as using memory-unsafe programming languages like C and C++.


“The development of new product lines for use in service of critical infrastructure or [national critical functions] NCFs in a memory-unsafe language (e.g., C or C++) where there are readily available alternative memory-safe languages that could be used is dangerous and significantly elevates risk to national security, national economic security, and national public health and safety,” the report says.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
My favourite German Chud, Eugyppius, is the guy I follow to keep abreast for German political gossip. He's usually seething pretty hard about the Traffic Light Co-coalition.
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/how-the-german-government-collapsed
I'm afraid some of the points he makes are flat-out erroneous, if not leftist propaganda (because the specific points are those that are held up by the mainstream media)

For instance,
  • "The CDU have been aping the AfD and railing against mass migration for months."
    The CDU is very notorious, not just among chuds, but among normal people who still have some working brain cells for talking the talk and not walking the walk. They, and especially the Bavarian CSU, who always flip-flop from being "ah, we are independent, we are not CDU" to being "we are CDU" depending on whether it would be advantageous or disadvantageous, are nothing but demagogues, and are not seen as reasonable or even potential AfD alternatives.
  • "They [CDU] even proposed draft legislation"
    The CDU has a pattern of voting against AfD drafts, only to propose the drafts themselves afterwards.
  • "if only the FDP joins the CDU, the AfD and the Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) in supporting it."
    BSW is not in support of restricting immigration. BSW is nothing but an offshoot of Left/Green/red.
  • "Strangely, though, the CDU have developed a mysterious anxiety about introducing any legislation until the elections, because they don’t want to pass anything with votes from the AfD or the migration-sceptical BSW."
    There exist only two reasons in this world why the BSW is being called migration-sceptical. One is that Sahra Wagenknecht has spoken out against immigration - to appear as a based and true and honest politician, in spite of her being a dirty commie whore. The second, main, reason is that BSW is being propagandized as "here, you AfD chuds, please vote BSW instead". Or "here, AfD is full of evil Nazis and conspiracy theorists and Putin dicksuckers, you can vote for BSW if you want a little less migration and woke bullshit". If you look at the actual heads of the BSW, if you look at those people, they are pretty much bang-on average Green/Left/red wokeists. And by "bang-on average wokeist", I mean complete fucking lunatics. Such as the co-chair of the BSW who explicitly advocates against any kind of criminal charges or prosecution against illegal immigrants, even those who have committed crimes. Not making this up.
And that's just the first paragraph.
 
Back