Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's no legal argument to sue a guy for taking part in an ongoing public debate, on issues of national import.Again, he was the most prominent guy who spread it, and there are arguments to be made that there were political and monetary reasons he was sued, he was the loudest and easiest target of this whole discourse after all.
He's a moron, Chris Christie was roasting him for repeating the same canned 20-second speech over and over again when questioned. Choosing him could reflect that that the Trump admin plans to basically use him as a passthrough to operate foreign policy directly from the White House, but I dunno.Even in 2016 I never really hated Rubio, he was an obstacle for Trump so I him defeated and he was establishment but he never really acted in a way for me to hate him. He might be an opportunist, but he is smart enough to see at this point that it would only serve his interests to stick it out with the MAGA movement I think. Looking back at the debates he actually made good points.
A bunch of those recounts were requested by Stein, they turned up voting machines in Detroit that had tallied 500+ votes for Hillary, but when the machines were opened there were only 300-some receipt copies printed on the spool inside. The recounts were then swiftly terminated.i remember in 2016 there was a push to get recounts that was immediately halted when the recounts were benefiting Republicans.
Lanza's mother Nancy was obsessed with guns and he practically grew up around them; as far as I can recall, he was a regular at the shooting range, and so was his mother, according to friends, out of a need for self-defense. He was obviously someone simply born different from others and shaped into what he ended up being because of people's reaction to those differences. He had no real purpose in life due to his complete social failure and tried to adapt his world view into that failure being okay and correct because it's actually society/culture who are in the wrong. Quite early on in his childhood his mother sheltered him and pretty much gave up any hope of Adam functioning like others do. He was homeschooled. He developed a keen interest in school shootings and shooters before him and made a huge spreadsheet of information about them; I don't doubt that he had thoughts of doing something like them while "sober".The drastic behaviour changes of Adam Lanza in the week before the shooting from a complete shut in to the killer he became and the possibility of a medication induced psychotic episode which has never been followed up on nor addressed.
However, there is a compelling legal argument for incitement.There's no legal argument to sue a guy for taking part in an ongoing public debate, on issues of national import.
You're just wrong.
No, there's isn't.However, there is a compelling legal argument for incitement.
A state may not forbid speech advocating the use of force or unlawful conduct unless this advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.
Problem is, the conflict has become a worse can of worms than ever before. Bibi isn't willing to wind it down because it keeps him from being impeached and jailed. The US is already using all kinds of assets against Hamas and Hezbollah, I'm not sure what more they could threaten them with aside from boots on the ground - which would destroy all of Trump's political capital, contradicting his core promises to voters. Russia and China also want the conflict to continue as a thorn in the side of Western powers. It'll take a true master negotiator to even begin to defuse it.I'm guessing he'll just tell Bibi that he loves and supports Israel, but goshdarnit those Iron Dome missiles are so expensive and that the US regretfully cannot subsidize them anymore. As for Hamas, he'll tell them to knock it off and stop whatever 3-letter agency is laundering money and gear to them. And if they keep at it, Trump will do that one stunt where he showed the Taliban(?) leader a satellite picture of his house.
Sanctions as a tactic are backfiring, they strengthen BRICS. Russia and China are building infrastructure to rival SWIFT and more sanctions will just convince more countries to use it.He will sanction the shit out of Iran, even more than now. Israel will then end the war with everyone and leave Southern Gaza to be Palestine but increase settlements in the Northern Territory.
which is what jones' retards did by harrassing the families.No, there's isn't.
Brandenburg v Ohio
Bigger because you're blind.which is what jones' retards did by harrassing the families.
That means "right the fuck now" where "now" is the moment it's spoken.unless this advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action
That hasn't been a thing in a long time.The site is fundamentally about documenting lolcows
yeah, your boot licking of the feds and big media is pretty repetitiveI'm just repeating myself at this point,
lol I doubt that seriously, you already were done how many times for this thing you REALLY don't care aboutI'm done arguing this.
It should be changed to the image of Biden looking back at the camera smiling as he walks off stage.
Consider the following you gorilla nigger:Again, he was the most prominent guy who spread it, and there are arguments to be made that there were political and monetary reasons he was sued, he was the loudest and easiest target of this whole discourse after all.
The 1st Amendment excludes it.
I'm just repeating myself at this point, I'm done arguing this.
The Dems lack the ability to introspect, so to quote an American hero "I doubt it."I think the real question remains, will we start to see less tranny faggot propaganda in Western media?
no probably more, like how 2016 was loaded with that shit to own drumf.I think the real question remains, will we start to see less tranny faggot propaganda in Western media?
Because it is. The Dems are super petty and have been keeping "score" of public disgraces. They haven't gotten over the fact Bill Clinton got successfully impeached (but not removed from office), so they try to settle the score by impeaching Trump. While they got to the trial stage, but they failed to get the votes to actually impeach Trump, let alone remove him from office. So they just try and try again. I bet some Dems were edging themselves at the idea of Trump being a one-term president to make up for Carter, but instead Trump is the 2nd non-consecutive term president and has one of the biggest wins in a while to rub their noes in it. Not to mention their obsession with "firsts" has them seething over the Dems losing two "First female president" candidates to Trump of all people, and now turn coat Tulsi has a clearer shot at being the first female president in the coming few decades than any of the other bitches in the DNC mean girl club right now.They would be making it clear to everyone a 3rd impeachment is just being done out of pure spite.
I don’t disagree. I think the notion there’s a “pure” version of the site is quite retarded. And if there is a “pure” farms, it would probably just be about Chris Chan because that was the original focus of the website.That hasn't been a thing in a long time.
People still do it, but lets be real with ourselves, the site is and has been metamorphosing into Josh's feminist hugbox where he spouts his bad takes and bans anyone that disagrees with him. Half of the things that get on the Front Page section has been non-lolcow related things.