State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
So I have a question for prosecutors. Would Nick's antics/ behavior the last few days cause you to revoke a plea deal you had offered?

Conversely, for defense atty's: I realize that firing a client is not all that easy, but it seems like the Barneswalker has lost all control of his client (if he ever had any control). Would his behavior the last few days get you to seriously consider firing him? If you decided not to, or couldn't fire ihm, what would/could you do to try and salvage this mess? (I mean in general terms, not to give them any ideas of how best to proceed.) Or is this ration of shit all par for the course for a defense atty?
Id be telling him that I'm going to charge him thirty grand up front for the witness tampering charge that's definitely coming ,so he needs to make his Dad aware of that to ensure the money's available.

Apparently it is extremely hard to get held with no bond in MN, but I'd tell him that every public statement he makes gets him closer to it and that he needs to prepare to enjoy jail, stalker-meth-head, unless he gets off the Internet.

A guy like Nick will fuck up your strat even from jail, you just need enough emails to him that it's incontrovertible it was all against advice of counsel, and enough money to make it worth it.
 
Or is this ration of shit all par for the course for a defense atty?
I feel like most defense attorneys who have been practicing long enough have had to deal with at least a few clients who can't stop sabotaging their own case. Committing more crimes, making damaging posts on social media, demanding they try bizarre legal strategies, etc., are all par for the course. Nick's probably not too bad compared to the SovCits and Freemen-on-the-Land who somehow get talked into legal representation.

What really sets Nick apart from the other self-sabotagers, and probably makes him unusually frustrating to deal with, is the fact that he's got a law degree and used to practice. He knows better, but still keeps going. That has to get tiring after awhile.
 
Last edited:
Not to defend Nick, but do you believe every word that comes out of crackheads? I'm not sure a judge would sign a warrant on the basis of "coke addict said thing"
They don't immediately need a warrant to validate any of it. This revolves around access to a Gmail Account. Aaron is the owner of said account and he would be the victim/complainant. They just subpoena the account records from Google. Where and when has the account been accessed. This will happen without Nick and his degenerates ever knowing.

Depending on where that leads them they may be able to do similar with any connected accounts.

Once they do that they will drop warrants on electronic devices.
 
I feel like most defense attorneys who have been practicing long enough have had to deal with at least a few clients who can't stop sabotaging their own case.
Criminal defense is only an occasional part of my practice, but, while I don't drink myself, I absolutely understand why many lawyers do.
 
Criminal defense is only an occasional part of my practice, but, while I don't drink myself, I absolutely understand why many lawyers do.
Criminals give me the least headaches by far, I find them rather easy to deal with - frankly. It's the fucking plaintiffs cases that drive me so nuts that I'm getting out of them, they are also WAY too expensive now-a-days. People watch too much Television and get weird idea about "science" and "experts"
 
Criminal defense is only an occasional part of my practice, but, while I don't drink myself, I absolutely understand why many lawyers do.
Not a lawyer, but I've met more than a few people who  really needed to listen to one, so I can guess just how much alcohol it would take for me to tolerate defense work. Tbh, I doubt that any amount of vodka would allow me to bite my tongue if I found out that a client had gotten arrested a second time after consenting to a search of their meth-filled glove box, then spent two hours having a nice chat with the friendly officer who told them they could go home if they were honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edict of Expulsion
Criminals give me the least headaches by far, I find them rather easy to deal with - frankly. It's the fucking plaintiffs cases that drive me so nuts that I'm getting out of them, they are also WAY too expensive now-a-days. People watch too much Television and get weird idea about "science" and "experts"
Most of them are fine, it's the ones you manage to get a really nice deal for and then they fail to appear at their CMA because they are out of the state and back on drugs despite having given you assurances they were going to be there, or who get a DUI less than 2 weeks into DUI diversion, who make you want to strangle them.
 
Most of them are fine, it's the ones you manage to get a really nice deal for and then they fail to appear at their CMA because they are out of the state and back on drugs despite having given you assurances they were going to be there, or who get a DUI less than 2 weeks into DUI diversion, who make you want to strangle them.
The FTA shit drives me up the wall. But,that second DUI - that's a second fee. And it's gonna be a bigger one because it's .more complicated and a bigger charge. You can even charge them extra to handle the diversion violation. It's a bummer on a personal/they are fucking up their lives level, but you have to find the silver lining somewhere.

They sure do bitch up a storm about that interlock on the second DUI, though.
 
Criminals give me the least headaches by far, I find them rather easy to deal with - frankly. It's the fucking plaintiffs cases that drive me so nuts that I'm getting out of them, they are also WAY too expensive now-a-days. People watch too much Television and get weird idea about "science" and "experts"
One of the wisest things a judge ever told me is criminal cases mean you're seeing bad people on their best behavior and civil cases are good people on their worst behavior.
 
I can't wait to hear what kind of retarded defense nick is going to come up with.
"Your honor, it could have been anyone that hacked into Aaron's accounts, took pictures, then hacked into my accounts to deseminate them. The logs are photoshopped. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, PUSSY LIQUOR"
 
You know the Rekietas in general really confirm the theory that your experiences and your soul shape your face as you grow up. Starting as a child you are innocent but as you grow up go through puberty go through education get a job eventually get a family a wife, all your deeds and actions are going to be reflected on your appearance as you go on in life. Look at what coke did to his face and his wife's. Same thing is going to happen to April as well as she grows older as the debauchery she engaged in and her whoredom are going to be the soul that shapes her appearance. And even though many will go to great lengths and plastic surgery to cover it they will never cover the ugly of their soul. I really hope from the bottom of my heart that those kids get custody by someone trully worth it and that they never have to engage with these degenerates ever again. Also that they chemically castrate them so not more have to suffer in their hands.
 
Last edited:
Same thing is going to happen to April as well
It already is. That's a rough 29 for someone who has never done any physical/outdoor labor or had kids. Her hair is already thinning. Most deterioration can first be seen in hair/nails because the body considers them inessential to survival and so stops realising already sparse nutrients to support them. Skin is usually next.
I'd love to see a full blood panel and nutritional assessment for all three of them.
 
Back