US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
That's why I said ignorant, retarded, and black @Puff
Fine, I'll admit I didn't read about the public figure part in the stuff I could find as a reason as to why the case was dismissed.

Still, what is with calling me black out of nowhere?, Why are you so fixated on race?, fuckin weirdo.

as far as I see, Trump is appointing a bunch of ultra-zionists so far
As usual, funny thing is, Jews that voted for trump decreased from 2020(30%) to 2024(22%), no matter how hard he appeals to them, they are still staunchly democrat.
 
Ironic how it seems SJWs react to Trump win the way it's claimed non-SJWs "alt-right" would've reacted to a hypothetical Harris win.*

* Which I think would have realistically been more of a disappointment or "it's all so tiresome" on average, rather than derangement.
I've got a friend who is still posting multiple times a day how Trump supports rape and that everyone who votes Trump should unfriend her and her husband is republican
 
Fine, I'll admit I didn't read about the public figure part in the stuff I could find as a reason as to why the case was dismissed.

Still, what is with calling me black out of nowhere?, Why are you so fixated on race?, fuckin weirdo.
As usual, funny thing is, Jews that voted for trump decreased from 2020(30%) to 2024(22%), no matter how hard he appeals to them, they are still staunchly democrat.
Now i can excuse a 30 pages long retard slapfight about the specific cases the first ammendment applies to
But double posting? you've gone too far Joey
 
From Cornell Law School's Definition of Defamation:

"Defamation is a statement that injures a third party's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel (written statements) and slander (spoken statements)."

To prove prima facie (at first sight) defamation, a plaintiff must show four things:
1) A false statement purporting to be fact;
2) Publication or communication of that statement to a third person;
3) Fault amounting to at least negligence;
4) Damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement.


Make of that what you will, what he did fell under this quite cleanly.
I'm more interested in Texas and Connecticut. After following the Vic Mignogna debacle back in 2019 I know Texas has a very strong anti-SLAPP statute, and from basic google so does Connecticut.

In any case prima facie just means at face value, meaning if you take everything that the plaintiff claims as true and everything the defendant claims as false, you have a case. When you get to trial the jury gets to weigh whose side more believable. Except it never got to a jury because the judge defaulted him.

Since Elon Musk is a common topic on this thread, he also had his own defamation lawsuit. This was back when those Thai kids were trapped in a flooded cave, and Musk deployed his stupid mini submarine while a team of divers showed up to actually save them. Elon called one of them a pedo who had a child bride (or something like that).

The diver's defamation lawsuit passed Elon's pretrial 12.B.6 motion to dismiss (as close as we get to an anti-SLAPP in federal court), meaning that if given the full benefit of the doubt on all points of contention, the diver had a clear defamation case. However, when it came to trial, and a jury had to decide who's account was more believable, they sided against the diver in favor for Elon.

We'll never really know with Alex Jones since it never went to a jury.

I'd argue in your post above the only clear cut factor was that Jones communicated to third parties. Whether they were statements of fact meant to be taken seriously, whether he did so negligently, and whether there was real damage would all be points of contention that a jury would have to decide.
 
If it's only half, then he's the greatest entrepreneur in history.
Yeah, people have this weird thing with guys like Elon and Musk where they downplay their achievements to nothing because orange man bad. Remember the "small loan of a million dollars" Trump meme? The Reddit brain virus somehow convinced folks that getting a loan of a million dollars is this magical threshold that allows you to build multiple multi-million dollar businesses with the greatest of ease and that anyone could do it (that's not a lot of money, and no they could not). I'm not gonna hail either of them as god-kings of business or something, but this reasoning for hating them is retarded.
 
Elise won 65 percent sure. But taking a seat that will have a special election in what will be March/April at the earliest where the election process will be controlled by New York Democrats, next R wont have Trump bump and the D's will froth their base into a "stop the Trump agenda" at all costs mood for granted is not wise.

Cherry on top is the Santos special election shows what kind of faggot they might put up on the seat to replace her.

You also didnt answer why her.
Stop being a doomer faggot. That seat was Republican before Trump was ever a president.
 
Biggest flaw in the voiced plan is cheaper energy. He has to convince oil and energy companies to open new stuff despite the chance that Dems destroy all the work in 2029. Unless some miracle happens you cant open a nuclear plant by then and earliest new oil will be online is likely after the 26 mid terms.
Again, Trump already did this in his first term. In fact, he annihilated these oil companies. He plummeted gas prices so fucking low in the US during his first term that he had to go BACK to the CEOs of Big Oil and get them to raise their prices again because he got them too low. There's 0 reason Trump wouldn't be able to do this again. The idea they wouldn't listen to him because of what might happen in 2029 is absolutely idiotic.

Why on earth do you think oil companies would be behind net zero emissions? Sure, they get to gouge their prices like crazy in the short term, but the long term leaves them holding the bag. Maybe in 2020 there was an argument for it, but the idea of having their cake and eating it too in the form of a new energy market still existed then. That possibility does not exist in 2024. The EV experiment has completely fucking failed. Nobody wants them. Nobody can afford them. They're too risky and problematic. Tesla dominated the market and everyone else has been a complete and utter fucking disaster. It's not just EVs either, every alternative energy industry has fucking failed. Biden signed massive wind farms all across the US' sea boards and he can't get any of them off the fucking ground. The long term of Zero Emissions now leaves big oil companies fucked and they have four years proving that to be the case.
 
I saw a squirrel outside of my house a couple of days ago for the first time since I started living here.
The local squirrels have been more friendly and sociable. Had one even stop like it was expecting me to feed it, when they're all really skittish normally. They believe we've made the right call, clearly.
 
Have you ever done farm work? It sucks.
There is no way you will get people to work for 15 dollars an hour on backbreaking, hard work when you could be a fry cook. So, mega farming corporations take over, as they have the machines and cost of scale. In return, prices go up. If you are okay with paying more for necessities, then cool.

Yes they will obviously be paid more. Counterpoint to costs going up is the massive cost decrease of energy which affects every part of the supply chain which will drive costs down across multiple markets. The value of actual labor in this country has been massively devalued. People doing real labor should be paid commensurate wage, that is not the problem and it never has been the problem. None of this shit exists in a vacuum.

Paying some useless 45 year old 15 dollars to dunk fries tho is a problem.
 
Does he have a Stargate behind him?


A microcosm of what her administrations fiscal policy would have been. Will be really funny if this fucks over dem fundraising for a while.
I used to love redbar, slowly realizing almost every single one of his targets was a right leaning conservative, slowly realizing almost every jew will mock and insult celebrities, comedians, actors, countries whatever under the guise of actually hating those things, thinking they're stupid, objectively bad w/e. But really it was always just simply that they hated white people, hated conservatives, and hated Christians. Its just been so blaringly obvious the last couple of years, they've stopped putting much effort into the guise.

The news of vivek/elon investigating Fauci is amazing. I hope more than anything that something comes of that. I'm not a huge covid vaxxer, whatever guy, I dont really care that much. But how they were able to censor and suppress information about the origins of Covid is horrific to me. Anything you're unable to even discuss raises huge red flags and its scary how OK the American people are OK at not being allowed to question certain topics.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, people have this weird thing with guys like Elon and Musk where they downplay their achievements to nothing because orange man bad. Remember the "small loan of a million dollars" Trump meme? The Reddit brain virus somehow convinced folks that getting a loan of a million dollars is this magical threshold that allows you to build multiple multi-million dollar businesses with the greatest of ease and that anyone could do it (that's not a lot of money, and no they could not). I'm not gonna hail either of them as god-kings of business or something, but this reasoning for hating them is retarded.
From what I have heard, the thing that set them off is that by saying "small", it implies that Trump considers the money he borrowed to be merely peanuts to kickstart his business and that since he was born into wealth, he has no idea how much that figure actually meant to the vast majority of people.

Now of course nobody was saying he didn't work hard (and smart) to balloon the initial investment given to him, a look at his actions during that time showed he wasn't retarded with his money and expertly crafted his brand to the public to push himself into billionaire status.
 
Has anyone else noticed a lot more squirrels since Trump won? Not even joking, at a Job site yesterday I saw like 30 squirrels.
I saw a squirrel outside of my house a couple of days ago for the first time since I started living here.
They believe we've made the right call, clearly.
Squirrels showing up less: America is doing worser?

Squirrels showing up more: America is doing better?

🐿️
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back