Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 29 2.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 305 26.5%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 816 71.0%

  • Total voters
    1,150
View attachment 6640116

A 53-year-old man who has made the conscious decision to structure his life around Internet memes. Suicide would be more honorable.
So two retarded rich people in charge of budgeting, what can possibly go wrong

Elon is going to plummet value so hard just like how he lost billions from twitter (it paid off in terms of power, but as a business, it still is trash), and all his achievements were because he took credit for other people's work.

Hopefully DOGE is just like his other businesses where he's just taking credit of more competent people, but that's too optimistic.
 
This is why I voted for Jill Stein.
Congrats you switched one WEF shill for another.

The cost of living did. Inflation did. Interest rates did. Even X as a platform, as a whole, did help, but not Elon's on-stage theatrics.
Nah those things maybe, but two things sealed the deal:
1. Helping hurricane victims, no matter how much or if it actually helped or not, as they weren't the government and "nothing was expected of them",
2. Both sucking zog-cock really hard while Harris was indecisive at best.

Interestingly, Led By Donkey's is a UK anti-conservative group. Maybe they're diversifying now that Labour is in.
About 60 years ago in Iran, a satirical magazine called Towfigh ran a Party of Donkeys (not an actual participating political party, more of an organisation), reportedly many celebrities and " intellectuals" at the time were members. More recently, another magazine tried a renewal/revival, but wasn't nearly as successful. In 2012, there was something similar in Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.

efficient in the same way he's running twitter
🤦‍♂️
Elon turned Twitter into an ad-infested, NFT-ridden "premium" hellhole, as annoying as Youtube and Instagram with unrelated content, that constantly adds and removes features and moves them around while fixing none of its problems. Where did this meme-ical belief of making Xitter efficient even come from?
 
Trump's illustrious and well-storied Right Wing Death Squads from 2016-2020 are sure to be replaced by DOGE enforcers, equipped with SS-styled uniforms replete with Shiba Inu insignia (and X branding.)

It'll be just like the marginalization of the SA after the Night of the Long Knives. He really is Trumpler.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Haftag
All they have to do is put the workers in a line, say: 'Trump 2024' and if they start seething they're getting fired.
9a6klz.jpg
Basically the SpongeBob movie scene where they can't start sperging out to give themselves away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really draining the swamp by putting billionaires and venture capitalists in federal leadership positions

MAGA amirite fellow white men

Correct.

The issue was never "rich people = bad," and anyone who thinks it was never actually understood the problem, which is that "the swamp" is a large group of career politicians and people in related positions screwing over the average person if it means making more money.

(Ironically, a lot of Musk's detractors' arguments prove him right in exactly that way, unbeknownst to those very detractors: Musk buying Twitter was a huge financial gamble made with the intent of doing some societal good, despite the fact that he knew it was overpriced, that the media would come after him and try to tank the stock through reputation-destruction and destroying the brand and thereby nullify the point of the purchase in the first place entirely if they were to succeed. People like you keep claiming that Musk's investment was stupid because it was financially unsound, yet don't understand that it disproves your simultaneous narrative of him being the Hollywood caricature of an evil, rich person intent only on further enriching himself.)

To put it a different way, in case you're still struggling to understand: Musk helping to "drain the swamp" is no more illogical or hypocritical than a soldier killing another soldier of a country that's currently engaged in committing a genocide to stop that genocide from continuing. You going "yeah, but that soldier just tried to stop murders by murdering someone himself" is not the clever argument you think it is.
 
Only because Elon has bitches while Chris tried to get laid with lesbians
Except elon's bitches aren';t there because they genuenly like him, they are there because of his money. How this fag managed to become the richest person in the world is beyond me. There are people that are far more sane than him, that make far more useful stuff that deserve the money more than him.
 
Given his track record of culling Twitter, I think he's a good fit.

The changes at tweeter did arguably improve its efficiency and also had a knock-on effect on the rest of the tech industry leading to downsizing across the board and mass layoffs. Whether that was a net positive or not is hard to say, but many of the big tech companies were turbo bloated and were just hiring people to do nothing so that other companies couldn't hire them.

Now whether or not tweeter itself is objectively better now compared to before is really hard to say, just saying it is operating with a much reduced headcount doesn't mean it is better. On the one hand there are once again more diverse voices allowed but on the other hand quite some high quality users left for other platforms or stopped posting entirely, there's a huge spam bot problem and because of the ad payouts to users it is now filled with fucking 3rd world people replying to every tweet with a fucking chatgpt summary or response. Those kind of things really devalue it compared to before (they might've happened without the monetization shit regardless though). I find that frustrating because there are some super valuable users like journalists who show up to court and give up to the minute tweets of what is happening in court (not a Kotaku style journalist, but a hardcore journalist/reporter, just reporting the facts) who don't seem to be able to get enough income from tweeter alone.

It kind of feels like, if anything, tweeter should've been made into a non-profit or something. I really do not get the sense that Elon will be able to monetize it effectively in the short term and I also do not get the sense that he has enough time budget to spend on it plus the other companies that he runs. To be fair to him though, his buy out of tweeter was a strategic masterplay, that much cannot be ignored or understated. Whether or not he is actually playing 4d backgammon remains to be seen though - I'm not so sure he would've been primed for a spot with Trump if Biden hadn't dropped out, but it certainly helped his case that he now owns tweeter.

The biggest tell about his strategy with tweeter will be seeing whether he can turn it into a super profitable app. I've read a bit here and there about some of his plans and they certainly are interesting - its an interesting property because it lets him compete with most other platforms with just a single platform.
 
I kind of feel like this thread isn't the place to be political (except now it is) but it feels like this time around Trump has some better "handlers". Having someone like Elon and some key advisors who aren't so politically rooted may unironically make him way better - just someone who can clearly tell him shit like "stay the fuck away from this person" or "do/don't do that".
Imagine looking at Elon Musk or Rogan and thinking he's less of a drag than Giulliani or Bannon
 
Back