Culture Kamala Harris ditched Joe Rogan podcast interview over progressive backlash fears - Decision seen as major blunder for campaign that lost male votes to Donald Trump

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1731531678350.png

Kamala Harris’s fears of a progressive backlash killed a plan for her to appear on Joe Rogan’s podcast, a campaign official has said, shedding light on a decision that infuriated some Democrats who are reeling after Donald Trump’s election victory.

The Harris campaign and Rogan, whose audience is bigger than that of many television networks, had discussed an interview for his podcast — a move some Democrats hoped would help Harris reach young men who were gravitating towards Trump.

The talks faltered because of concerns at how the interview would be perceived within the Democratic party, said Jennifer Palmieri, a senior adviser to Harris’s husband, Douglas Emhoff, during the campaign.

“There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn’t want her to be on it, and how there would be a backlash,” Palmieri said on Wednesday.

Palmieri, who previously worked in the White House and for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, is among the first officials from the Harris campaign to go into detail over a decision that some Democrats fear may have contributed to their loss.

Just over a week after Harris’s heavy defeat the party is hunting for scapegoats, with some operatives blaming President Joe Biden. Others have said the campaign flubbed its media strategy and was too cautious with alternative media.

Rogan, who endorsed Trump the night before the US election, is widely viewed as the most popular podcaster in the country. He holds a particularly large following among young men — a demographic Trump successfully spent much of the past year courting through appearances across a “manosphere” of YouTubers and podcasters.

Palmieri also said news leaking that Harris was in talks to do Rogan’s show created a “very weird dynamic” with the podcaster.

“Because all of a sudden he’s on his heels about how his audience is going to react to this, and the demands that they were going to put on him to be tough on her,” Palmieri said at a conference organised by The Clearing House, a payments group owned by large US banks.

A representative from Harris’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump’s interview with Rogan has been viewed nearly 50mn times on YouTube, while the interview with vice-president-elect JD Vance racked up 16mn views.

By comparison, about 29mn people watched Harris’s speech to the Democratic National Convention and fewer than 8mn watched her interview on Fox News.

Rogan, a former UFC commentator, has gained a large following particularly among men for his hours-long, often meandering conversations with guests on a wide range of topics, including martial arts, aliens, workout routines and politics.

He also stirs controversy. In 2022, musicians including Joni Mitchell pulled their music from Spotify in protest against the platform’s ties with Rogan, who had recently interviewed a virologist who was critical of coronavirus vaccines. Backlash swelled when musician India.Arie posted a video of Rogan using the N-word multiple times on his show. Spotify removed more than 100 of his podcast episodes from its app.

Democratic senator Bernie Sanders this week argued members of his party should be speaking to podcasters such as Rogan. “I think we’ve got to get — and clearly you have an alternative media out there, a lot of podcasts that millions and millions of viewers — get on the show,” he told CNN on Sunday.

https://www.ft.com/content/9292db59-8291-4507-8d86-f8d4788da467 (Archive)

1731531752160.png

1731541878706.png
1731541904247.png

https://x.com/SantsPliego/status/1856829516036841882 (Archive)
 
Last edited:
I will never understand these edgy weirdos fascination with Bernie. He is a perpetual loser who cucked not once but three times in recently memory. Bernie is a dinosaur that needs to die.
Bernie is the poster child of the ideal propaganda communist the useful idiot and naive unknowledgeable fence sitters want to be.
 
Last edited:
I can't wait until this cunt is forgotten to time like other presidential losers such as Dukakas.
And this will happen quicker than many think. Shit, she was largely forgotten while VP until Biden had to drop out of the race. Don't believe she will ever run for anything again, since she got that flabby ass kicked so badly against President Trump.

Was just wondering...do you think it would have helped her campaign if she had been three-holed by Ric Flair on pay-per-view? Bet Ric would have been up for it, he could use the money.
 
If I remember correctly, Kamala agreed to the podcast, but wanted Rogan to come to her, to limit the interview to an hour, and severely restrict which questions could be asked going off a pre-approved list.

This was not a "strategy" so much as knowing he would laugh in their faces and say no. The terms were ones the sympathetic media likely constantly agreed to. Kamala was completely incapable of giving a freeform interview without getting herself into massive trouble. She was not only dishonest and deceptive, but too stupid to be able to think on her feet and make it sound good. Completely reliant on memorized sound bites, as we saw in the debate. Things would have gotten even worse if the media wasn't constantly covering for her.
As stupid as she is, she at least has enough self-awareness to realize how inept she is at public speaking. She's also cunning enough to conjure an excuse that passes the blame onto others.

It's like how she was smart enough to avoid talking about immigration and trans since both are incredibly unpopular, but not smart enough to take a strong stance against both.
I've never actually watched a whole Joe Rogan interview. Is he THAT hard on his guests? He has all these weird UFO guys on and he lets them say shit that was debooonked decades ago.
Rogan's not hard on his guests at all. (Although, tbf, I've only listened to a few of his shows.) He lets them talk about all sorts of things and doesn't really challenge what they say, at least not in a hard-hitting, gotcha kind of way. But I still think Kamala would have bit it. She's either too afraid to let anyone know what she's really like or she really is a tremendous airhead, but, either way, there's no way she'd be able to handle talking for three hours regardless of the friendliness of the host.
 
So we have two possibilities. I'm inclined to think its a bit of both.

Either its:

1. She couldn't actually talk to Rogan for 3 hours the same way Trump and Vance did. If she did it would have just been the same old drivel and would've looked retarded next to the Trump/Vance podcasts. This one is extremely obvious to anyone that doesn't just sit there and consoom MSM all day long without looking at anything else.

2. She kowtowed to a minority of the party where a lot of them didn't even vote for her anyway because of "muh Bernie" and "muh genocide". Good plan!

Guess what? It doesn't fucking matter! Regardless of her reasoning it made her look weak. If you can't even handle what should be basic bitch questions from a guy like Rogan you sure as fuck aren't going to do us any favors on the world stage. 45M people on YT watched the podcast before election day, and who the fuck knows how many total views it had when you take all other platforms like X, Apple music, and spotify into account that also had the podcast posted. Who knows how many of those millions were US voting age citizens, and how it influenced their decision. The only thing that is certain is that it was one of many massive Ls the Harris campaign took at a very critical moment.

I've never actually watched a whole Joe Rogan interview. Is he THAT hard on his guests? He has all these weird UFO guys on and he lets them say shit that was debooonked decades ago.
No lol. Usually Joe with some exceptions isn't too hard on his guests. That doesn't mean he can't be hard, or that he didn't ask serious questions to both Trump and Vance, but it wouldn't have been anything someone that actually knows wtf they're talking about couldn't handle. If Joe had her on it would've just been them talking about asinine shit about her personal life, and questions she should've been able to fucking answer like "So what are your plans for the economy?"

Joe isn't stupid, but its not like he's some massive political commentator that asks the really tough questions. Hell the toughest thing he really asked Trump was the JFK files. She was probably scared shitless about being asked about the border, which is definitely what I think Joe would've mentioned in a unscripted interview. Oh and her worst nightmare is also there too. She can't just make shit up because Joe will just call on Jamie to fact check her ass if she really tried to bullshit him in a way that rubs him wrong. She couldn't just go "but muh Trump is racist" because he probably would have said something along the lines of "umm ackshually how can you explain him standing next to Rosa Parks???"
 
Last edited:
Rogan's not hard on his guests at all. (Although, tbf, I've only listened to a few of his shows.) He lets them talk about all sorts of things and doesn't really challenge what they say, at least not in a hard-hitting, gotcha kind of way. But I still think Kamala would have bit it. She's either too afraid to let anyone know what she's really like or she really is a tremendous airhead, but, either way, there's no way she'd be able to handle talking for three hours regardless of the friendliness of the host.
the only time was that one alex jones appearance where joe was super adamant of fact checking everything jones said, i think was one of the more recent ones
 
Back