Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

My Mum, who is many years post The Change, bled for 21 months post her fist "vaccine". My sister had a stroke and then a miscarriage. My Aunt, who was always religious and had deeply held faith, has said she no longer feels anything when trying to pray since her "vaccines" (her case to me is especially sad as she worked in an elder care facility, in "covid" and truly did her best for the residents, but seeing so many otherwise healthy or well residents having food and fluids withdrawn and being punted down the load them up on Midozolam and let them die path really fucked her up) and yet still, people react with shock when I say I have never had, and never will have, a covid "vaccine".

What will it take for people to actually start to think and truly see what it all was? My personal belief is, they needed an excuse to test mRNA vaccines, so they invented Le Coof to do so.
 
What will it take for people to actually start to think and truly see what it all was?
People don't want to be the villain. They don't want to be the mistaken rube, the guy who was played, who was hurt via their misplaced trust or their ignorance or their ideals. Its very difficult for someone to actually accept and admit that they did bad, or that they hurt themselves through their own actions. Doing so usually requires some social pressure or acceptance, but we have the opposite. To attempt to believe that maybe the vaccine was a mistake is a radical alt right perspective, you're a nazi monster trump fascist if you believe that.

Between the inherent desire to not be wrong and not be evil, people don't want to be vilified for it either. Some people push through anyway and come to uncomfortable conclusions, but most people don't want to fight the entire society just to shout "I fucked up and you all encouraged it". And there's no real single statement, fact, or piece of evidence that can change, address, or adjust this now. The whole things become deliberately tainted and partisan.
 
It's going to be interesting if they unleash RFK Jr to actually investigate big pharma directly
The only things he's been given the go ahead is the chronic illness from the processed foods industry and his uncles assassination.
It'll be wild, asuming no fuckery to "save Our Democracy", seeing all these 'down with capitalism corpos are evil' types suddenly screaming and crying about evil drumpfler and rfk persecuting Our Healthcare Heros because they dont believe in science and want to watch children die of measles or whatever
 
I live in Western Australia and as such I had the "benefit" of being able to wait and watch both the virus and the vaccine narratives play out. It was clear to me early on that the virus was a nothingburger, and that the various vaccines were bad news.

I was outspoken in warning people about the dangers of the vaccines, a few friends in particular pushed back against me and a couple suggested I was in full Alex Jones mode, spouting "dangerous conspiracy theories".
Fast forward a few years, and it turns out I was correct, and they were not.

The people that were pushing back the hardest, STILL not been able to bring themselves to admit they were wrong. (I believe, for reasons that have been highlighted by the posters above, not wanting to be wrong, or evil for having pushed the vaccine on others including their children.)

That's all I fucking want... for the people that mocked me for simply caring enough to warn people about the risks of taking an experimental gene therapy drug to cure the sniffles, to admit they were wrong. It's not too much to ask, surely?
 
That's all I fucking want... for the people that mocked me for simply caring enough to warn people about the risks of taking an experimental gene therapy drug to cure the sniffles, to admit they were wrong. It's not too much to ask, surely?
Unfortunately it is. Many people would, without exaggeration, rather die than admit they were ever wrong about something.
 
That's all I fucking want... for the people that mocked me for simply caring enough to warn people about the risks of taking an experimental gene therapy drug to cure the sniffles, to admit they were wrong. It's not too much to ask, surely?
You are looking at this the wrong way. The people who mocked you revealed themselves to be worthless sub-human vermin who deserve nothing but scorn. You should be thankful that this once-in-a-century gay-op made them reveal their true nature.

You no longer need to care about them. You no longer need to waste time or energy thinking about them or speaking to them, for they are nothing. Do you ever think about a rat eating a discarded moldy piece of bread at the dump? Do you care what that rat might think of you or how it scurried about when it saw you?
 
Talk about a coincidence or "cohencidence".
Unfortunately it is. Many people would, without exaggeration, rather die than admit they were ever wrong about something.
Let's see how they would react if we said to them: "So you prefer dying and see these companies making lots of billions with their experimental vaccines you get and saying to you "Thank you sucker" instead of taking care of these SOBs by thanking them for ruining you life before your die?"

Btw, on a off-topic sidenote, let's throw Fraudci and co. to Pakistan. It's polio vaccine but they might get the same results with covid "vaccines".

Terrorists have been hunting down polio vaccinators in Pakistan. The country recently launched a campaign aimed at immunizing 45 million children over the age of 5. Terrorists bombed a vaccination site, injuring 23, including children. Vans transporting polio staff have been targeted. Are these anti-vax conspiracy theorists? Violence in no form is tolerable, but there is a reason that vaccinators are being hunted down, and it stems back to the early 2010s when the CIA used a vaccination program to mask an espionage program.
 
So the supposed myth of 'the vaccinated will have 5 years', yeah, maybe not such a myth.

(tables are coming)

UK Government Report Admits AIDS Is Surging Among Covid-Vaccinated​

Hunter Fielding
October 21, 2024, Monday

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is surging among people who received Covid mRNA vaccines, a shocking official UK government report has admitted.

The UK government’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report reveals that doubly vaccinated 40-70-year-olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people.

Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%).

If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.

The 5 PHE tables below from their excellent Vaccine Surveillance Report, separated by 4 weeks, clearly show the progressive damage that the vaccines are doing to the immune system’s response.

People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week.

Weekly Decline in doubly vaccinated immune system performance compared to unvaccinated people…

.
1731562517957.png.

Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months. 30-50 year olds will have lost it by Christmas.

These people will then effectively have full-blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.

The vaccine booster shots have to be the same as the vaccines themselves because it takes forever to do clinical trials and get approval for something different.

So if you take a booster shot, these figures show that you are giving yourself an even faster progressive form of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (after a couple of months of effectiveness).

Table 2. COVID-19 cases by vaccination status…

Cases reported by specimen date between week 32 and week 35 2021 – see this

.
1731562608942.png
.

Cases reported by specimen date between week 33 and week 36 2021 – see this

.
1731562625576.png
.

Cases reported by specimen date between week 34 and week 37 2021 – see this

.
1731562646443.png
.

Cases reported by specimen date between week 35 and week 38 2021 see this

.
1731562665610.png
.

Cases reported by specimen date between week 36 and week 39 2021 see this

.
1731562685194.png
.

Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above).

The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time).

But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realized.

They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination.

 
Last edited:
Their immune systems are deteriorating at around 5% per week (between 2.7% and 8.7%).

If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.
Yeah, it attacks bone marrow. To quote myself from a couple years ago:

CD34+ HSPC levels in umbilical cord blood basically decline to nothing after COVID-19 infection or vaccination, and vaccination is worse. The stem cells are just plain gone.
The vax wipes out hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the marrow, because the LNPs transfect them and then your immune system kills them.

Most of these injuries from the vax are basically like autoimmunity from loss of self-tolerance. The cells transfected by the LNPs are treated by the immune system as a foreign body, like transplant rejection, and destroyed. This is why the symptoms are so variable. Which tissue is affected the most depends entirely on where the vaccine biodistributes, the subject's metabolic health (younger and healthier with better translation mechanisms in the cells = worse outcome because you make more Spike).

Dan Wattendorf at DARPA was one of the main guys pushing for this bullshit. He would go up on stage and say, to paraphrase, "Why not skip over a bunch of vaccine/biologic production steps we normally use and use human cells as bioreactors to make x molecule of interest instead?"


Here's why you don't do this. It's because if you succeed in transfecting human cells with foreign nucleic acids and getting them to produce a foreign protein, then congrats. You played yourself. You got a cell to produce a protein that the body has zero tolerance for, and as soon as you have a cell studded with foreign proteins, then the next thing that happens is that antibodies bind to them, and then immune cells obliterate them.

Your macrophages and neutrophils are not people. They don't have eyes, and they don't have brains. They cannot discriminate between a cell membrane studded with foreign proteins and a virus studded with foreign proteins. Everything that they do is based on chemotaxis, on attraction to specific molecular signals.

Picture a blind guy fumbling around and using braille. When your immune cells grope one of these transfected cells studded with foreign proteins with antibodies bound to them, their immediate reaction is, "Hey, this is fuckin' weird, I'm gonna eat this!", and then they engulf whatever it is and drown it in bleach and peroxide. Literally.

They don't care if it's your heart muscle or aorta and they just took out your heart. They don't care if it's your bone marrow with baby immune cells. They don't give one single fuck. If it has foreign proteins on it, the next thing that happens is that antibodies will bind to them, and the next thing after that is that immune cells will kill them dead.

There is no way that the people who did this did not realize that this shit would happen. This was intentional mass murder.



Ladies and gentlemen, there were papers published as early as 2012, which I read a couple of years ago, that said that it is well understood in the industry by formulators that the payload that's contained within lipid nanoparticles when injected into animals and people leads to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into your ovaries. I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn't sleep. The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren't there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries. And given I've told you the first two things, which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the instructions. And that instruction by the way, is to make a poison, you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced.
 
These people will then effectively have full-blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS.
This was intentional mass
Does this mean the baby I'm mentioning in the below quote, with two double-vaxxed parents in their early 30s, will potentially be born without a proper immune system? And moreover have two AIDS patients for parents before their 10th birthday? Or am I horribly misreading your posts? Please for the love of almighty God tell me it's the latter.
I'm going to be an uncle (well, first cousin once removed, but I'm going to be called "Uncle [PandaChai]") soon
 
Isn't that data from 2021? Are they all dead now?
Why am I not dead? I had like three shots and my immune system is as good as ever.
It looks like they've taken the data recorded in late 2021 and drawn a straight-line trend from it to the end of this year. Straight-line trends are generally statistically unreliable at the best of times, but moreso when you have very few data points. There's immunological studies past 2022 IIRC, which means that there's no understanding of how people's immune systems may have subsequently acted. It could be a temporary decline that recovers once treatments cease, or it could drop off a cliff. Nobody knows. There's a general reluctance to perform any studies into the matter out of fear of being labelled anti-vax and pilloried out of the scientific community.

They're also apparently assuming that the recorded decline is total immune response, rather than just response to the rona and its variants. IMO it's not real AIDS, in the sense of a total immune collapse, but rather induced immunological tolerance; other diseases are going to prompt a normal reaction, but anything that looks like covid will be ignored, meaning it takes much longer for an infection to clear out. Anecdotally, people around me who have taken the treatments are catching colds more often and taking longer to get over them, which makes sense when you realise that a lot of common cold viruses are coronarivuses. Enough of them are similar enough to sars covid to sneak past that immunological tolerance, if it exists, which would explain the phenomenon.

So... you're not dead because it's not really AIDS. It's cheap chinese knock-off AIDS, which means it broke after two weeks and never worked right to begin with.
 
It looks like they've taken the data recorded in late 2021 and drawn a straight-line trend from it to the end of this year. Straight-line trends are generally statistically unreliable at the best of times, but moreso when you have very few data points. There's immunological studies past 2022 IIRC, which means that there's no understanding of how people's immune systems may have subsequently acted. It could be a temporary decline that recovers once treatments cease, or it could drop off a cliff. Nobody knows. There's a general reluctance to perform any studies into the matter out of fear of being labelled anti-vax and pilloried out of the scientific community.

They're also apparently assuming that the recorded decline is total immune response, rather than just response to the rona and its variants. IMO it's not real AIDS, in the sense of a total immune collapse, but rather induced immunological tolerance; other diseases are going to prompt a normal reaction, but anything that looks like covid will be ignored, meaning it takes much longer for an infection to clear out. Anecdotally, people around me who have taken the treatments are catching colds more often and taking longer to get over them, which makes sense when you realise that a lot of common cold viruses are coronarivuses. Enough of them are similar enough to sars covid to sneak past that immunological tolerance, if it exists, which would explain the phenomenon.

So... you're not dead because it's not really AIDS. It's cheap chinese knock-off AIDS, which means it broke after two weeks and never worked right to begin with.
Sounds kinda like most vaccination responses, which by necessity also lower immune response since it occupies the immune system with something.
Extrapolating that stuff linearly sounds like a pretty stupid thing to do. From 2021 to Christmas 2024 is kind of a long time, significant amount of immune response drop should have already happened. It hasn't, the study or rather the article is just retarded.
 
Sounds kinda like most vaccination responses, which by necessity also lower immune response since it occupies the immune system with something.
It's not the same. There was evidence of a permanent reduction of response to infection by similar viruses, which isn't a side-effect of normal vaccination. Edit (fixing shit): The reason the immune system fails to deal with subsequent infection is because of something called "antigenic original sin", in which the immune system relies on previous antigen memory to guide its response to subsequent infection. This means similar but divergent antigens trigger an immune response that can't actually deal with them. You tend not to get this problem deactivated or live vaccines because there's so many parts for the immune system to train itself on, but it's a serious problem with sub-unit vaccines or these mRNA/DNA treatments, because it trains itself only on the very particular proteins given to it and becomes autistically focused on just those proteins. A virus doesn't have to change much to evade the response, but the immune system can't recognise the changes and adapt.

Again, the issue is that nobody is studying it in this case, so there's no way to know. Anyone who tries is sent to science purgatory.
 
Last edited:
We are really going to have to put more funding into and speed up the research into better controlling and adapting the immune system. It's not just for autoimmune conditions, allergies, immune overreactions (as we've seen with covid and even the flu, a big killer sometimes) and strengthening it in general anymore. Work closely tied to the work on our general biochemistry and response systems.
 
Back