The point is that it has very serious consequences for their potential life outcomes.
This summarized the bulk of your post and is easier to quote than the whole thing.
Its also something I completely agree with. Having a child when you are not adequately prepared for it has serious consequences. Where we disagree is that taking the life of that child is an acceptable alternative to facing those consequences, or that doing so doesnt have serious consequences itself. Additionally I would argue that the consequences in question can be traced back to the root cause of having sex with someone when you're not prepared for the possibility of pregnancy.
That is the main argument at hand after all. People who support abortion seem to think young single women are entitled to have sex as much as they want without having to face the consequences of doing so. Why? There is no virtue in promiscuity. Surely you would agree the momentary pleasure of loose sex is not worth the risk of facing the serious consequences we're discussing. We're not even talking about the myriad of consequences that premarital sex has outside of pregnancy, the bulk of which effect women more than men.
Now let's talk about supporting young mothers. Did you know that Planned Parenthood, the leading provider of child murder in America, receives almost 400 Million dollars a year in tax money? How many young mothers could that money support instead? A quick search says it costs about 300k to raise a child to the age of 18. For the sake of easy math lets say the rate is roughly flat per year. 300,000/18 = ~16.5k Lets round that up to 20k to account for a newborn and all the additional expenses. 400,000,000/20,000 = 20,000. Instead of funding planned parenthood we could support 20,000 newborns a year. Imagine if we not only educate teens and young women on the serious consequences of loose sex, thus reducing the number of them having it, and we also provide an instant 20k to any and all young single mothers. That would be a lot better than supporting child murder IMO.
getting an abortion is not a satanic death ritual
Whether you believe it or not it is, and such ritual sacrifices can be traced back through history. For example in Biblical times there was a popular false god called moloch. Those who worshipped moloch would construct statues in his likeness what functioned as giant furnaces, then mothers of newborn infants would throw their children into the fires of moloch in exchange for worldly power. The false gods of the old world were all just Satan in disguise, thus child sacrifice, especially when done by the mother of the child, is satanic in nature.
The root of this ritual is the inverse perversion of God's natural order. A mother is intended to love her child, to do anything for her child, even to suffer death for the sake of her child. For a mother to instead murder her child for her own sake is completely backwards. This is the kind of thing Satan craves and delights in. Sin and suffering.
Intentioanly taking the life of another outside of justified warfare or self defense is the definition of murder.
