The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
>Clarkson calling the left out for wanting the ethnically cleanse the countryside
>Rumblings in Labour about deporting foreign criminals, new effort into stopping the boats after flat out refusing to talk about the issue
>Germany on the brink
>Jews hunted in Amsterdam leading to open calls for deportations of Arab men - Arabs being specifically named.
Things are moving faster than I expected. I wonder if we see a left wing shift to abandoning the refugees are welcome queers crowd in order to survive the coming years.
 
Fuck you, we still have our alcoholism and sectarian football to keep that card.
I’m in Scotland a lot, porridge bro, so I’d like to apologise. I hate your government even more than Kier’s gang of queers and that has poisoned my response. Your country is beautiful.

I shall have some haggis for dinner and a square sausage for breakfast tomorrow in penance.

I bloody love haggis.
 
Is it idiocy or malice, especially at times where food is already unreasonably expensive?
Both. There's a coordinated effort to shut down farming all across the world in the name of "the environment".
Gates and co buying up huge swathes of agricultural land in the US.
Since it's not been mentioned. Money and the 2030/2035 plan.

The 2030 plan was pushed back to 2035, but it's basically the same. Eet zee boogs, live in ze pod, you will own nothing and be happy, etc. No one is eating the bugs or the horrid vegan meals when farmers are providing actual food.

But the main reason imo is money. Long story short, farmers are the biggest land owners outside of shithole cities, and agriculture is one of (if not THE) the biggest, most reliable markets in the world, and yet it hasn't been shit up by venture capital and stockholders due to being local, family run businesses. Farmers aren't willing to sell even when some private equity firm hands them a blank cheque, so they have to run to the government to force the farmers hand.
 
One notable exception though: For some fucking reason there's a bunch of muslamicized gingers, I do not know why they're just always around.
Muhammad was apparently a ginger. That's why you'll often see brown muslims with beards dyed red. I'm guessing native ginger losers end up being coaxed to become muslims to rise up in social worth.

What's fun is making the argument with them that mimicking the appearance of the Prophet is a form of shirk akin to making a picture of him.
 
Muhammad was apparently a ginger. That's why you'll often see brown muslims with beards dyed red. I'm guessing native ginger losers end up being coaxed to become muslims to rise up in social worth.

What's fun is making the argument with them that mimicking the appearance of the Prophet is a form of shirk akin to making a picture of him.
Judas was red-haired as well, or at least red beared, weird because gingers are only 2-6% of the population.
>Clarkson calling the left out for wanting the ethnically cleanse the countryside
Again, he is literally part of the establishment. He isn't a rebel, he is better placed than 90% of the country to do something about it and he doesn't except make money off tv (for four years now). His show is probably a long con to convince farmers that converting to eco protection is better. Didn't he dig a huge lake on his property for that?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: OrangeJuliusEvola
>Clarkson calling the left out for wanting the ethnically cleanse the countryside
>Rumblings in Labour about deporting foreign criminals, new effort into stopping the boats after flat out refusing to talk about the issue
>Germany on the brink
>Jews hunted in Amsterdam leading to open calls for deportations of Arab men - Arabs being specifically named.
Things are moving faster than I expected. I wonder if we see a left wing shift to abandoning the refugees are welcome queers crowd in order to survive the coming years.
You're barely scratching the tip of the iceberg my friend. For even funnier news, there is a town in Michigan where the muslim population outnumbers white people and they have voted to ban the pride flag despite the faggots and trannies being their biggest source of support since they have been leeching off benefits since day one.
Sweden has finally decided that mass immigration was a mistake and their response was apparently to pay them nicely to convince them to leave.
Austria's election a few months ago ended up in an electoral gridlock with the 'far right' party becoming the largest political party.

It does suck that all the parties in the West willing to do anything against the muslim incursion are either Russo or Sinophilic or just straight up retarded like Nigel Farage's gang who do nothing try to stimulate their prostate with their tongue whilst sticking their heads up their asses all day.

I honestly doubt anything will change. If you look at Uni districts the majority consensus is still clearly pro-immigration, kinda like the gays for palestine movement. They don't care about logical consistency, they'll just blindly throw their support behind anything that is anti-western. The problem with Europe right now is that whilst the right wing parties are growing in size, so are the far left parties.

The Uni I've been studying in has had a huge problem with international students for years now, half the students are Chinese. They straight up don't speak english most of the time and cheat their way through using AI or hiring others to write their essays for them. Despite this, most students are still supportive of them, despite it clearly being against British interests.

Maybe some of the 'moderate' left wing parties will shift towards taking a stronger stance against immigration, but I highly doubt parties like Green will change anything, their gender and immigration policies mean everything and I don't think they'd be willing to give up either. And even if labour tried to change anything they're far too incompetent for any stance they take to matter.

Sorry if I sound stupid but this is what I believe to be the most likely outcome.
 
It does suck that all the parties in the West willing to do anything against the muslim incursion are either Russo or Sinophilic or just straight up retarded like Nigel Farage's gang who do nothing try to stimulate their prostate with their tongue whilst sticking their heads up their asses all day.
wasn't nigel farage arguing that we cannot deport any of these "people" a couple of weeks ago, he's cleary controlled opposition.
 
Okay, I am now unbanned and I will no longer be a Southern fairy faggot.

I have one question regarding the tax and farmer business stuff.

Isn't it common knowledge that many businesses purchase farmland to avoid paying tax/certain taxes? So the likes of Jeremy Clarkson, would do that? isn't that bad right? I feel like any issue within the UK like this becomes manipulated by the rich (they have the power and resources) to turn the working class, economically vulnerable to turn on the government when they are doing something okay and trying to stop billionaires from avoiding tax havens. Again, if you know more or have differing opinions please educate my faggot mouth, I don't have aids btw.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Anti Lolicon Bomb
Isn't it common knowledge that many businesses purchase farmland to avoid paying tax/certain taxes? So the likes of Jeremy Clarkson, would do that? isn't that bad right? I feel like any issue within the UK like this becomes manipulated by the rich (they have the power and resources) to turn the working class, economically vulnerable to turn on the government when they are doing something okay and trying to stop billionaires from avoiding tax havens.
It's an inheritance tax. Businesses won't be affected by it.

The issue is that the value of the farm, and therefore the value assessed for the inheritance tax, is entirely in the land and physical assets. The only way to pay the tax is to sell off part of the land or some other asset (the proceeds from which would also be taxed), which for a typical smallholding would turn a barely profitable farm into a loss-maker. Many farmers, faced with this, will simply sell up and quit, with the land most likely becoming a new housing development or falling fallow, or being used for something other than food agriculture. As for rich people buying farms to avoid inheritance tax: If the farm is productive, what does it matter who owns it? I'd consider the investment in maintaining food production to be of far more value than the one-time tax that could be realised on inheritance. There are a lot of other ways to tax the wealthy that don't involve the destruction of our national ability to feed ourselves.

The real motivation isn't about taxing wealth, anyway. It's about asserting control.
 
It's an inheritance tax. Businesses won't be affected by it.

The issue is that the value of the farm, and therefore the value assessed for the inheritance tax, is entirely in the land and physical assets. The only way to pay the tax is to sell off part of the land or some other asset (the proceeds from which would also be taxed), which for a typical smallholding would turn a barely profitable farm into a loss-maker. Many farmers, faced with this, will simply sell up and quit, with the land most likely becoming a new housing development or falling fallow, or being used for something other than food agriculture. As for rich people buying farms to avoid inheritance tax: If the farm is productive, what does it matter who owns it? I'd consider the investment in maintaining food production to be of far more value than the one-time tax that could be realised on inheritance. There are a lot of other ways to tax the wealthy that don't involve the destruction of our national ability to feed ourselves.

The real motivation isn't about taxing wealth, anyway. It's about asserting control.
I guess it's very hard for anyone in power ot sove this issue. Thank you for edicating me, I have zero sympathy or remorse for business or millionaires who suddnely have a farm. There's always two sides right? You can dislike the government- but I'm a working class white boy, so let them pay more tax.

I saw a podcast/video of john Lewis execs saying they might have to lay of staff... why? it isn't because of the government- it's because the CEO and all those in the head office have a crazy salary.

I live in a town where John Lewis is a main attraction, you can guess and figure it out.
 
Back